univerge site banner
Original Article | Open Access | Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 2024; 6(2), 39-51 | doi: 10.34104/ajpab.024.039051

Spatial Distributions of Gaseous Air Pollutants Including Particulate Matter in the Narsingdi City of Dhaka Division

Mir Md. Mozammal Hoque* Mail Img Orcid Img ,
Jakia Begum Mail Img ,
Mahdi Hasan Mail Img ,
Mehedi Hasan Khan Mail Img ,
Sarathy Datta Mail Img

Abstract

This study summarizes the concentration of major gaseous air pollutants in Narsingdi city of Dhaka division. To accomplish this study, we investigate fifteen sampling stations (Velanagar, Railway Station, Boro Bazar, Ghoradia, Brahmondi, Shaheprotap, Launch Terminal, Satirpara, Bus Terminal, Silmandi, Gangpar Bridge, Panchdona, Shekherchar and Anandi) of the study area. In this study, we measured six gaseous air pollutants together with PM2.5 and PM10 during September 2022 using the air quality meter Aeroqual (Series500). The highest concentration of PM2.5 was detected at 58 µg/m3 at Boro Bazar whereas the highest concentration of PM10 was 165 µg/m3 at Anandi of the study area where emissions from vehicles, construction activities and waste burning are predominant. Moreover, in this study, we found a statistically significant correlation with CHand CO2 (r = 0.679, p > 0.01), PM2.5 and PM10 (r = 0.630, p > 0.05) indicating their sources of emission might be similar including fossil fuel burning in vehicles, industrial emissions, and road dust. Furthermore, we calculated the AQI value based on PM2.5 concentration, and the highest AQI (152) value was observed in Boro Bazarof the study area followed by Bus Terminal (129), Gangpar Bridge (117), Anandi (112), Ghoradia (102), Brahmondi (89), Panchdona (84), Satirpara (83), Shaherpotap (82), Silmandi (80), Railway Station (78), Madhabdi (78), Shekherchar (76), Launch Terminal (76), Velanagar (59) and was very much compatible with US consulate, Bangladesh published data.

INTRODUCTION

Air pollution poses worlds most serious environmental health threats towards people and their properties (Hoque et al., 2020; Mukta et al., 2020). Other environmental implications of air pollutants include global warming, acid rain, and effects on wildlife (Gauderman et al., 2004; Jansen et al., 2005; Epton et al., 2008). The principal air pollutants of concern are ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), methane (CH4), chlorine (Cl2), and particulates (PM2.5 and PM10), which are emitting due combustion of fossil fuels as well as biomass burning (Dianat et al., 2016; Khaefi et al., 2017; Hoque at al., 2020). Air pollution is a pressing issue for Bangladesh, which ranks 169th (out of 178 countries) at the Environmental Performance Index for Air Quality (APT, 2016). Here, main sources of air pollution include emission from faulty vehicles, especially diesel run vehicles, brick kilns and dust from roads and construction sites and toxic fumes from industries (Hoque et al., 2020; Mukta et al., 2020). According to the Department of Environment (DoE), the density of airborne particulate matter (PM) reaches 463 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) in Dhaka city during the dry season (Dec-ember-March), which is the highest level in the world (Air Pollution Reduction Strategy for Bangla-desh, Final Report, 2012). Although, World Health Organization (WHO) air quality guidelines (2006) recommend a maximum acceptable PM level of 20 µg/m3, whereas cities with 70 µg/m3 are considered as highly polluted.

Poor ambient air quality is instigating damage to human health, agricultural production and materials (Mukta et al., 2020; Hoque et al., 2022b).  So, it is high time to create awareness and motivation about air pollution management and control all over Bangladesh. However, in different times air pollution issues have been considered, and often guided by the multinational agencies like the World Bank (WB), Asian Development Bank (ADB), United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), which have taken measures or have made schemes to minimize and limit air pollution. However, the Department of Environment (DoE), the Government agency funded with conserving the environment in Bangladesh, sought plans to create a policy which will reduce air pollution in Bangladesh under the framework of the Male declaration to regulate and avoidance of air pollution and its possible trans-boundary consequences for South Asia (Air Pollution Reduction Strategy for Bangladesh, Final Report, 2012). 

Air pollution is a major anthropogenic environmental concern that has recently gained prominence among all environmental issues in Bangladesh. According to a World Bank report, the economic cost of pollution of air in healthcare sector of Bangladesh alone is estimated annually as U.S. $132-583 for Dhaka city and U.S. $200-800 for the four biggest cities in Bangladesh, which contributes 0.7-3.0% of the countrys per year GDP (C. Brandon, Economic valuation of pollution of water and air in Bangla-desh: World Bank Workshop negotiations draft, 1997). Moreover, a 20 percent cutback from the current level of PM10 in Dhaka would save health costs of around 169-492 million annually (World Bank, 2006). In addition, among the megacities of the world, Dhaka leads the rankings, having 7000/yr cardiovascular mortality and 2100/yr excess cases of hospital admissions for COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) attributable to air pollution (Azkar et al., 2012; Gurjar et al., 2010).

Objectives of the study 

This study was conducted to satisfy the following objectives:

1)To find out the concentration level of CO, CO2, NO2, SO2, Cl2, CH4, PM2.5 and PM10 at the ambient air of Narsingdi Sadar. 

2)To show the spatial distribution of these pollutants by using Geographical Information System (GIS). 

3)To calculate AQI (Air Quality Index) for the study area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area

Narsingdi is a district in central Bangladesh. It is situated north-east of Dhaka, capital  of Bangladesh. It belongs to the division of Dhaka. The district is renowned for its synthetic textile industry. The study was conducted in fifteen areas of Narsingdi Sadar (23°558.79"N and 90°433.80"E) of Dhaka division including Velanagar, Railway Station, Boro Bazar, Ghoradia, Brahmondi, Shaheprotap, Launch Ter-minal, Satirpara, Bus Terminal, Silmandi, Gangpar Bridge, Panchdona, Shekherchar, Madhabdi and Anondi.

Figure 1. Map of study area with sampling locations

Data collection 

The study was conducted from fifteen different locations of Narsingdi Sadar. The research was based on primary air quality data under the direct supervision of a supervisor. Primary data were collected by Aeroqual S500 (New Zealand), a portable air quality monitor during September 2022.

AQI calculation

In our study AQI is calculated by using following formula:

 

Here,

I: AQI (Air Quality Index)

C: the pollutant concentration

C low: the concentration breakpoint that is ≤ C

 C high: the concentration breakpoint that is ≥ C

 I low: the breakpoint Index narrating to C low 

I high: the breakpoint Index narrating to C high 

C low, C high, I low, I high are from the US EPA Pollutant Breakpoint.

Table 1: The US EPA pollutant breakpoint for calculating AQI.



RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Spatial distribution of PM2.5 in the study area

As shown in Table 2, the concentration of PM2.5 ranged from 16-58 µg/m3, average is 31.55µg/m3. However, this value is lower than the Nanjing, China 65.36 µg/m3 (Hasnain et al., 2021), Dhaka 77 µg/m3 (Khuda K.E., 2020) and Delhi 182.49 µg/m3 (Sethi et al., 2020) and higher than the previous study of Chittagong 21.2 µg/m3 (Hoque et al., 2022a). However, the spatial expansion of PM2.5 showed that the highest value of PM2.5 was observed 58 µg/m3 in Boro Bazar (Fig. 3). The sources of PM2.5 of this area may be associated with fossil fuel burning vehicles, road side construction and public gathering.

Table 2: Concentration of air pollutants in the study area.

Fig. 3: Spatial distribution of PM2.5 in the study area.

Spatial distribution of PM10 in the study area

As displayed in Table 2, concentration of PM10 ranged from 19-165 µg/m3, average 61 µg/m3. Interestingly, this value is lower than the Nanjing, China 102.75 µg/m3 (Hasnain et al., 2021), Dhaka 65.5 µg/m3 (Khuda K.E., 2020), Delhi 299.78 µg/m3 (Sethi et al., 2020) and higher than the previous study of Chittagong 57.3 µg/m3 (Hoque et al., 2022a). However, the spatial expansion of PM10 showed that the highest value of PM10 observed 165 µg/m3 in Anandi (Fig. 4). The sources of PM10 of this area may be associated with roadside construction, waste burning, dust from open land and grinding operation.distribution of CO in the study area

As demonstrated in Table 2, concentration of CO ranged from 0.0-1.7 ppm (avg. 0.22 ppm). In comparison, this value is lower than Nanjing, China 0.89 ppm (Hasnain et al., 2021), Dhaka 1.8 ppm (Khuda K.E., 2020), Delhi 2.51 ppm (Sethi et al., 2020) and Chittagong 1.2 ppm (Hoque et al., 2022a) of the previous study. However, the spatial expansion of CO showed that the highest value of CO observed in Shaheprotap of the study area (Fig. 5). The sources of CO of that area may be associated with incomeplate combustion of vehicular emission.

Fig. 4: Spatial distribution of PM10 in the study area.

Spatial distribution of NO2 in the study area

As given in Table 2, concentration of NO2 ranged from 5.72-5.75 ppm (avg. 5.74 ppm). Regrettably, this value is higher than the Nanjing, China 0.03 ppm (Hasnain et al., 2021), Dhaka 0.08 ppm (Khuda K.E., 2020), Delhi 0.06045 ppm (Sethi et al., 2020) and Chittagong 0.0244 ppm (Hoque et al., 2022a) of the previous study. However, the spatial distribution of NO2 showed that the highest value of NO2 observed 5.75 ppm in Bus Terminal (Fig. 6). The Spatial distribution of SO2 in the study area

As given in Table 2, concentration of SO2 ranged from 0.0-0.1 ppm (avg. 0.046 ppm). In comparison, concentration of SO2 is higher than Nanjing of China 0.005 ppm (Hasnain et al., 2021), Dhaka 0.016 ppm (Khuda K.E., 2020), Delhi 0.010 ppm (Sethi et al., 2020) and Chittagong 0.013 ppm (Hoque et al., 2022a) of the previous study. Fig. 7 showed the spatial of SO2 in the study area. As observed in Fig. 7, the highest value of SO2 observed 0.1 ppm in Madhabdi followed by Anandi, Gangpar Bridge, Silmandi, Launch Terminal, Railway Station and Brahmondi. The sources of SO2 of those areas may be associated with burning of sulfur containing fuels by locomotives, ships and motor vehicles.

Fig. 5: Spatial distribution of CO in the study area.

Fig. 6: Spatial distribution of NO2 in the study area.

Spatial distribution of CO2 in the study area

As displayed in Table 2, concentration of CO2 ranged from 571-693 ppm (avg. 614.93 ppm). However, the spatial distribution of CO2 showed that the highest value of CO2 observed 693 ppm in Railway Station. The sources of CO2 of that area may be associated with deforestation, land clearing for infrastructure, and degradation of soils.

Fig. 7: Spatial distribution of SO2 in the study area.

Spatial distribution of CH4 in the study area

As given in Table 2, concentration of CH4 ranged from 8-37 ppm (avg. 15.8 ppm). However, the spatial distribution of CH4 showed that the highest value of CH4 observed 37 ppm in Railway Station followed by Boro Bazar (20 ppm), Goradia (20 ppm), Bhramondi (19 ppm), Shaheprotam (18 ppm), Silmandi (15 ppm), Velanagar (15 ppm), Bus Terminal (14 ppm), Launch Terminal (13 ppm), Gang-par Bridge (13 ppm), Satipara (12 ppm), Pachonda (12 ppm), Madhabdi (11 ppm), Shekherchar (10 ppm), Anandi (8 ppm) (Fig. 9). The sources of CH4 of the study area may be associated with organic waste decomposition at the surrounding area of the Railway Station.


Fig. 8: Spatial distribution of CO2 in the study area.

As given in Table 2, concentration of Cl2 ranged from 0.02-0.04 ppm (avg. 0.028 ppm). Fig. 9 the spatial distribution of Cl2 in the study area. As shown in Fig. 9, that the highest value of Cl2 observed as 0.04 ppm in Anandi followed by Boro Bazar (0.03 ppm), Goradia (0.03 ppm), Shaheprotap (0.03 ppm), Velanagar (0.03 ppm), Launch Terminal (0.03 ppm), Gangpar Bridge (0.03 ppm), Madhabdi (0.03 ppm), Railway station (0.02 ppm),  Bhramondi (0.02 ppm), Silmandi (0.02 ppm), Bus Terminal (0.02 ppm), Satipara (12 ppm), Pachonda (0.02 ppm), Shekherchar (0.04 ppm) (Fig.  9). Sources of Cl2 of those areas may be associated with textile and dying industry, cooling hot water, bleaching activities and photochemical oxidation of different types of air pollutants. For workers who use Cl2, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Hazard Administration (OSHA) regulates the level of Cl2 in workplace air for safety. OSHA has set a permissible exposure limit (PEL) for Cl2 at 0.1 ppm. Fortunately, the highest value of Cl2 0.04 ppm in this study is lower than the OSHAs permissible limit 0.1 ppm.

Spatial distribution of CH4 in the study area

As given in Table 2, the concentration of CH4 ranged from 8-37 ppm (avg. 15.8 ppm). However, the spatial distribution of CH4 showed that the highest value of CH4 observed 37 ppm in Railway Station followed by Boro Bazar (20 ppm), Goradia (20 ppm), Bhramondi (19 ppm), Shaheprotam (18 ppm), Silmandi (15 ppm), Velanagar (15 ppm), Bus Terminal (14 ppm), Launch Terminal (13 ppm), Gang-par Bridge (13 ppm), Satipara (12 ppm), Pachonda (12 ppm), Madhabdi (11 ppm), Shekherchar (10 ppm), Anandi (8 ppm) (Fig. 9). The sources of CH4 of the study area may be associated with organic waste decomposition at the surrounding area of the Railway Station.


Fig. 9: Spatial distribution of CH4 in the study area.

As given in Table 2, concentration of Cl2 ranged from 0.02-0.04 ppm (avg. 0.028 ppm). Fig. 9 the spatial distribution of Cl2 in the study area. As shown in Fig. 9, that the highest value of Cl2 observed as 0.04 ppm in Anandi followed by Boro Bazar (0.03 ppm), Goradia (0.03 ppm), Shaheprotap (0.03 ppm), Velanagar (0.03 ppm), Launch Terminal (0.03 ppm), Gangpar Bridge (0.03 ppm), Madhabdi (0.03 ppm), Railway station (0.02 ppm),  Bhramondi (0.02 ppm), Silmandi (0.02 ppm), Bus Terminal (0.02 ppm), Satipara (12 ppm), Pachonda (0.02 ppm), Shekherchar (0.04 ppm) (Fig.  9). Sources of Cl2 of those areas may be associated with textile and dying industry, cooling hot water, bleaching activities and photochemical oxidation of different types of air pollutants. For workers who use Cl2, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Hazard Administration (OSHA) regulates the level of Cl2 in workplace air for safety. OSHA has set a permissible exposure limit (PEL) for Cl2 at 0.1 ppm. Fortunately, the highest value of Cl2 0.04 ppm in this study is lower than the OSHAs permissible limit 0.1 ppm.

Fig. 10: Spatial distribution of CH4 in the study area.

Calculation of AQI value of the study area

Table 3: Comparison of measuring air pollutants data with previous study.


The study measured the AQI values of the different locations of the study area based on PM2.5 concentration. Among all the study locations, this study found out that the highest AQI value 152 was observed in the Boro Bazar of the study area followed by Bus Terminal (129), Gangpar Bridge (117), Anandi (112), Ghoradia (102), Brahmondi (89), Panchdona (84), Satirpara (83), Shaherpotap (82), Silmandi (80), Railway Station (78), Madhabdi (78), Shek-her char (76), Launch Terminal (76), Velanagar (59). In this study measured AQI value of the study area were compared with published AQI value of US consulate (website aqicn.org/city/bd) and were very much comparable to the US consulate published data (Table 4).

Table 4: Comparison of calculated AQI value of the study area with published data.

According to AQI categories and colors, corresponding index values and cautionary statements for different levels of health concern, we have categorized every site of the study area based on air quality (Table 5). Launch Terminal, Satirpara, Panchdona, Shek-her char and Madhabdi are in moderate condition, where air quality is acceptable during the study conducted. However, there may be danger for people who are unusually sensitive to air pollution. Whereas, air quality of Boro Bazar, Ghoradia, Bus Terminal, Silmandi, Gangpar Bridge and Anandi are in unhealthy condition to the sensitive groups. Where peoples of sensitive categories may be experienced health effect, but general public are may not be affected.

Table 5: Air Quality Index and health concern of the study area.

As given in Table 5, air pollution of Velanagr, Railway Sation, Brahmondi, Shaheprotap

CONCLUSION

In this study, we measured concentration of major gaseous air pollutants (CO, CO2, NO2, SO2, Cl2 and CH4) and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) by a portable sensory based air quality monitoring device (Aeroqual series 500). Average concentrations of air pollutants were as follows: CO (0.22 ppm), CO2 (614.93 ppm), NO2 (5.74 ppm), SO2 (0.0467 ppm), CH4 (15.8 ppm), Cl2 (0.30 ppm), PM2.5 (31.55 µg/m3) and PM10 (61 in µg/m3). The highest peak of CH4 was (37 ppm) measured in railway station. Whereas, highest concentration of Cl2 (0.30 ppm) was measured in Anandi. Interestingly, two waste dumping site were identified in the same study locations where highest CH4 and Cl2 were detected during the study. Average concentration of SO2 was measured 0.50 ppm, which is higher than those of Nanjing, Chaina and Dhaka. Extended concentration of SO2 emission in the study area maybe associated with sulfur containing coal burning in the brick field. The AQI values indicates that air pollution status in Velanagr, Railway Sation, Brahmondi, Shaheprotap, Launch Terminal, Satirpara, Panch-dona, Shekherchar and Madhabdi were in moderate condition where air quality is acceptable. Whereas, air quality status of Boro Bazar, Ghoradia, Bus Terminal, Silmandi, Gangpar Bridge and Anandi were unhealthy for sensitive communities of people.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors acknowledge the Research center of Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology Univer-sity, Tangail, Bangladesh for their financial contri-bution to accomplish the research.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS:

All the authors of this manuscript agreed that they have no confliction to make the manuscript publish-able.

Article References:

  1. Ahmed, S., Akter, Q.S., and Bhowmik, M. (2016). Effect of air pollution on FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC% of the traffic policemen in Dhaka city. J. of Bangladesh Society of Phy-siologist, 11(2), pp.39-42.
  2. Air Pollution Reduction Strategy for Bang-ladesh Final Report, (2012). Department of Environment, Government of Bangladesh in association with Department of Civil Engine-ering, Bureau of Research, Testing and Con-sultation, Bangladesh University of Engine-ering and Technology. 
  3. Air quality, (2022). index Retrieved 14 Oct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_quality_index 
  4. APT, (2016). Air Pollution in Dhaka, Bang-ladesh. Real-time Air Quality monitoring project. http://aqicn.org/country/bangladesh 
  5. Arnab IZ., Ali T., and Hossain, M.M. (2013). Consideration of Environmental Effect of Power Generation: Bangladesh Perspective: Energy and Power Engineering. 5,1521-1525. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2013.54B288 
  6. Azkar, M.M.B.I., Chatani, S., and Sudo, K. (2012). Simulation of urban and regional air pollution in Bangladesh. J. of Geophysical Re-search. Atmospheres, 117(7).
  7. Baldasano, J.M., Valera, E. and Jiménez, P. (2003). Air quality data from large cities. Science of the Total Environment, 307(1-3), pp.141-165.
  8. Begum, B. A. and Hopke, P. K. (2018). Ambient air quality in Dhaka Bangladesh over two decades: Impacts of policy on air quality. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 18(7), pp.1910-1920.
  9. Begum, B.A., Hopke, P.K., and Markwitz, A. (2013). Air pollution by fine particulate matter in Bangladesh. Atmospheric Pollution Rese-arch, 4(1), pp.75-86.
  10. Bishoi, B., Prakash, A., and Jain, V.K. (2009). A comparative study of air quality index based on factor analysis and US-EPA methods for an urban environment. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 9(1), pp.1-17.
  11. Bonasoni, P., Laj, P., and Di Biagio, C. (2010). Atmospheric Brown Clouds in the Himalayas: First two years of continuous observations at the Nepal Climate Observa-tory-Pyramid (5079 m). Atmospheric Chemis-try and Physics, 10(15), pp.7515-7531.
  12. C. Brandon, (1997). Economic valuation of air and water pollution in Bangladesh: Workshop discussion draft, World Bank. https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/0-8213-4115-4  
  13. Cao, J., Chow, J. C., and Watson, J. G. (2013), Evolution of PM2.5 Measurements and Stand-ards in the U.S. and Future Perspectives for China, Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 13, 1197-1211. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.11.0302   
  14. CASE, (2018). Ambient Air Quality in Bang-ladesh. Clean Air and Sustainable Environ-ment Project. Department of Environment, Agargaon, Dhaka. Available from: http://case.doe.gov.bd/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5&Itemid=9   
  15. Collins, W.J., Webber, C.P., and Powell, T. (2018). Increased importance of methane redu-ction for a 1.5degree target. Environmental Research Letters, 13(5), p.054003.
  16. Dalefield, R., (2017). Smoke and other inhaled toxicants. Veterinary toxicology for Australia and New Zealand, 1st edn. Elsevier, pp.361-372.
  17. Defra. RoTAP, (2012). Review of Trans-boundary Air Pollution: Acidification, Eutro-phication, Ground Level Ozone and Heavy Metals in the UK. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Available from: http://www.rotap.ceh.ac.uk/documents 
  18. Department Of Health, (DOE, 2018) Fine Particles (PM 2.5) Questions and Answers [link available: https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/indoors/air/pmq_a.htm 
  19. Dey, S., and Dhal, G.C. (2019). Materials pro-gress in the control of CO and CO2 emission at ambient conditions: An overview. Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 2(3), pp. 607-623.
  20. Dianat, M., Radmanesh, E., and Goudarzi, G. (2016). Disturbance effects of PM10 on iNOS and eNOS mRNA expression levels and anti-oxidant activity induced by ischemia-reper-fusion injury in isolated rat heart: protective role of vanillic acid. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(6), pp.5154-5165.
  21. Dimitriou, A., and Christidou, V. (2011). Causes and consequences of air pollution and environmental injustice as critical issues for science and environmental education. The Impact of Air Pollution on Health, Economy, Environment and Agricultural Sources, pp. 215-238.
  22. DOE, (2019a). Sources of Air pollution in Bangladesh. Brick kiln & Vehicle emission Scenario. Department of Environment. Agar-gaon, Dhaka. Available from: http://doe.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/doe.portal.gov.bd/page/cdbe516f_1756_426f_af6b_3ae9f35a78a4/2020-06-10-10-14-5c997af8b7845 a59a5f8dd1c41dd7f13pdf  
  23. Emilie Brooks, (2021). Carbon Dioxide Effects on Humans and the Environment. Eco Jungle. https://ecojungle.net/post/carbon-dioxide-effects-on-humans-and-the-environment 
  24. Epton, M.J., Dawson, R.D., and McCartin, F. (2008). The effect of ambient air pollution on respiratory health of school children: A panel study. Environmental Health, 7(1), pp.1-11.
  25. Ernest, Z., (2015). Human Actions and the Atmosphere. Earth Science. https://socratic.org/questions/what-are-the-major-sources-of-sulfur-dioxide-and-why-is-it-dangerous#159081   
  26. Fine Particles, (PM 2.5) (2018). Questions and Answers. Link Available:https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/indoors/air/pmq_a.htm 
  27. Frei, M., Razzak, M.A., and Becker, K. (2007). Methane emissions and related physic-chemical soil and water parameters in rice-fish systems in Bangladesh. Agriculture, eco-systems & environment, 120(2-4), pp.391-398.
  28. Gauderman, W.J., Avol, E., and Margolis, H. (2004). The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(11), pp.1057-1067. 
  29. Geravandi, S., Goudarzi, G., and Shirbeigi, E. (2015). Health endpoint attributed to sulfur dioxide air pollutants. Jundishapur J. of Health Sciences, 7(3).
  30. Gnyawali, D.R., He, J., and Madhavan, R. (2006). Impact of co-opetition on firm com-petetive behavior: An empirical examination. Journal of management, 32(4), pp.507-530.
  31. Gurjar, B. R., A. Jain, A., and J., Lelieveld (2010). Human health risks in megacities due to air pollution, Atmos. Environ., 44, 4606-4613.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.011 
  32. Haque, H.A., Huda, N., and Rahman, M.H. (2017). Ambient air quality scenario in and around Dhaka city of Bangladesh. Barishal University Journal, Part-1, 4(1), pp.203-218.
  33. Hasnain, A., Hashmi, M.Z., and Sheng, Y. (2021). Assessment of Air Pollution before, during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Nanjing, China. Atmosphere, 12(6), p.743.
  34. Hoque, M.M.M., Ashraf, Z., and Nasrin, S. (2020). Meteorological influences on seasional variations of air pollutants (SO2, NO2, O3, Co, PM2.5 and PM10) in the Dhaka Megacity. American J. of Pure and Applied Bio-sciences, 2(2), pp.15-23.
  35. Hoque, M.M.M., Khan, M.M., and Sarker, M.N.I. (2022a). Assessment of Seasonal Variations of Air Quality and AQI Status: Evidence from Chittagong, Bangladesh. Indonesian J. of Environmental Management and Sustainability, 6(3), pp.88-97.
  36. Hoque, M.M.M., Sultana, F., and Kobir, M.H. (2022b). Air quality status in Narayanganj industrial city of Bangladesh. Bangladeh J. Environ. Sci., 42, pp 69-77.
  37. Hoque MMM, Ashraf Z, and Nasrin S. (2020). Meteorological influences on seasonal variations of air pollutants (SO2, NO2, O3, CO, PM2.5, and PM10) in the Dhaka megacity. Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 2(2), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.34104/ajpab.020.15023 
  38. IPCC, (2014). Climate Change: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on the Climate Change.
  39. Jackson, R.B., Saunois, M., and Tsuruta, A. (2020). Increasing anthropogenic methane emissions arise equally from agricultural and fossil fuel sources. Environmental Research Letters, 15(7), p.071002.
  40. Jansen, K.L., Larson, T.V., and Lippmann, M. (2005). Associations between health effects and particulate matter and black carbon in subjects with respiratory disease. Environmental health perspectives, 113(12), pp.1741-1746.
  41. Kent, J. (2021). Transport, access, and health in Urban Form and Accessibility. Elsevier, 207-222.
  42. Khaefi, M., Geravandi, S., and Farhadi, M., (2017). Association of particulate matter impact on prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Ahvaz, southwest Iran during 2009-2013. Aerosol and air quality research, 17(1), pp.230-237.
  43. Khalequzzaman, M., Kamijima, M., and Nakajima, T. (2007). Indoor air pollution and its impact on children under five years old in Bangladesh. Indoor air, 17(4), pp.297-304.
  44. Khuda, K.E. (2020). Air pollution in the capital city of Bangladesh: its causes and impacts on human health. Pollution, 6(4), pp. 737-750.
  45. Kimball, B.A., and Idso, S.B. (1983). Increasing atmospheric CO2: effects on crop yield, water use and climate. Agricultural water management, 7(1-3), pp.55-72.
  46. Kruti, Davda, (2020). Chlorine monitoring, All you want to know about Cl2. Link Available: https://oizom.com/knowledege-bank/chlorine-monitoring/ 
  47. Leakey, A.D., Ainsworth, E.A., and Ort, D.R. (2009). Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J. of experimental botany, 60(10), pp.2859-2876.
  48. Lundegard, P.D. (1964). Methane in Environmental Forensics. Academic Press, 97-110.
  49. Mahmood, S.A.I. (2011). Air pollution kills 15,000 Bangladeshis each year: the role of public administration and governments integrity. J. of Public Administration and Policy Research, 3(4), pp.129-140.
  50. Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., and Bezir-tzoglou, E. (2020). Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: A Review.  Front. Public Health, 8(14). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014 
  51. Manisalidis, I., Stavropoulou, E., and Bezirt-zoglou, E. (2020). Environmental and Health Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review. Frontiers in Public Health. 8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014  
  52. Mar, K.A., Unger, C., and Butler, T. (2022). Beyond CO2 equivalence: The impacts of methane on climate, ecosystems, and health. Environmental science & policy, 134, pp.127-136.
  53. Mukta, T.A., Hoque, M.M.M, and Biswas, G.K. (2020). Seasonal variations of gaseous air pollutants (SO2, NO2, O3, CO) and particulates (PM2. 5, PM10) in Gazipur: an industrial city in Bangladesh. Advances in Environmental Technology, 6(4), pp.195-209.
  54. Nahar, N., Mahiuddin, S., Hossain, Z. (2021). The severity of environmental pollution in the developing countries and its remedial measures. Earth, 2, 124-139. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth2010008   
  55. PM10, (2022). [Link Available:https://www.iqair.com/blog/air-quality/pm10  
  56. Rahman, M. (2021). Bangladesh transitioning to a developing country. Available from: https://cpd.org.bd/bangladesh-transitioning-to-de velopingcountry/ 
  57. Rahman, M.H., and Al-Muyeed, A. (2005). Urban air pollution: a Bangladesh perspective. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 82.
  58. Rana, M., Mahmud, M., and Sulaiman, N. (2016). Investigating incursion of trans boundary pollution into the atmosphere of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Advances in Meteorology, 2016.
  59. Sajan, D., Md, S.Q.H., and Mohammad, S. (2017). Socioeconomic conditions and health hazards of brick field workers: A case study of Mymensingh brick industrial area of Bang-ladesh. J. of Public Health and Epidemiology, 9(7), pp.198-205.
  60. Santos, G. (2017). Road transport and CO2 emissions: What are the challenges? Transport Policy, 59, pp.71-74.
  61. Sethi, J.K., and Mittal, M. (2022). Monitoring the impact of air quality on the COVID-19 fatalities in Delhi, India: using machine learning techniques. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 16(2), pp.604-611.
  62. Shakeel, A.I.M. (2011). Air pollution kills 15,000 Bangladeshis each year: The role of public administration and governments integrity. J. of Public Administration and Policy Research, 3(5), pp.129-140.
  63. Sharma, M., Pandey, R., and Johri, S. (2003). Interpretation of air quality data using an air quality index for the city of Kanpur, India. J. of Environmental Engineering and Science, 2(6), pp.453-462.
  64. Singh R P, and Kaskaoutis D G, (2014) Crop Residue Burning: A Threat to South Asian Air Quality. Available from: 
  65. https://eos.org/features/crop-residueburning-thre at-south-asian-air-quality 
  66. United Nations Environment Programme, (2012). Global Environment Outlook GEO 5: Environment for the Future We Want. United Nations Environment Program.
  67. United States Environmental Protection Agency, (2017). Particulate matter (PM) basics.
  68. Wildfire Smoke and Your Patients Health: The Air Quality Index, (2022). 
  69. https://www.epa.gov/wildfire-smoke-course/wild fire-smoke-and-your-patients-health-air-quality-index.
  70. William, A. (2020). Where Does Bangladesh and Dhakas Air Pollution come from? Smart Air.https://smartairfilters.com/en/blog/bangladesh-dhaka-air-pollution-sources 
  71. World Bank, (2006). Bangladesh Country Environmental Analysis, vol. II, Technical Annex: Health Impacts of Air and Water Pollution in Bangladesh [CD-ROM], Washington, D. C.
  72. World Health Organization, (2005). Effects of air pollution on childrens health and development: a review of the evidence.
  73. World Health Organization, (2006). Air quality guidelines: global update 2005: particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. World Health Organization.
  74. World Health Organization, (2018a). Ambient Air Pollution. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-andhealth/air-quality-and-health/ambient-air-pollution/pollutants 
  75. Wuebbles, D.J., and Jain, A.K. (2001). Concerns about climate change and the role of fossil fuel use. Fuel processing technology, 71(1-3), pp.99-119.
  76. Yu, I.T.S., Qiu, H., and Tse, L.A. (2013). Synergy between particles and nitrogen dioxide on emergency hospital admissions for cardiac diseases in Hong Kong. Inter j. of cardiology, 168(3), pp.2831-2836.

Article Info:

Academic Editor

Md. Ekhlas Uddin, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Gono Bishwabidalay, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Received

February 1, 2024

Accepted

March 1, 2024

Published

March 8, 2024

Article DOI: 10.34104/ajpab.024.039051

Corresponding author

Mir Md. Mozammal Hoque*

Professor, Department of Environmental Science and Resource Management, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail-1902, Bangladesh.

Cite this article

Hoque MMM, Begum J, Hasan M, Khan MH, and Datta S. (2024). Spatial distributions of gaseous air pollutants including particulate matter in the Narsingdi city of Dhaka division. Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 6(2), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.34104/ajpab.024.039051

Views
311
Download
134
Citations
Badge Img
Share