This site uses cookies for learning about our traffic, we store no personal details. ACCEPT COOKIES DECLINE COOKIES What are cookies?
univerge site banner
Review Article | Open Access | Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 2024; 6(5), 169-175 | doi: 10.34104/ajpab.024.01690175

Advances in Cancer Treatment: Harnessing Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Oncolytic Viruses for Targeted Therapy

Md Rakibul Hasan* Mail Img Orcid Img

Abstract

Effective cancer treatment remains a major challenge due to its heterogeneity and complexity. However, emerging therapies such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and oncolytic viruses show great potential in leveraging the bodys natural defenses to selectively target and destroy cancer cells. These promising treatments have demonstrated encouraging results in clinical trials, and ongoing research and development are expected to further enhance their efficacy and improve patient outcomes.

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is a complex and heterogeneous disease that poses a significant challenge to modern medicine. Despite significant advances in cancer therapy, conventional treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery have limitations, including poor efficacy and systemic toxicity. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel and effective therapies that can selectively target cancer cells while sparing normal cells. Recent advances in the field of immune therapy and virotherapy have led to the development of promising new approaches that harness the power of nature to improve cancer therapy (Kontermann et al., 2021). 

Among these approaches, Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) and Oncolytic viruses have emerged as promising candidates for targeted cancer therapy. ADCs are a class of targeted cancer therapies that use monoclonal antibodies to selectively deliver cytotoxic drugs to cancer cells, while Oncolytic viruses are viruses that are genetically engineered to selectively infect and kill cancer cells (Tsuchikama et al., 2018). These novel therapies offer several advantages, including improved efficacy, reduced toxicity, and increased specificity compared to conventional cancer treatments. In this review, we will discuss the latest developments in the field of ADCs and Oncolytic viruses, their mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, and challenges facing their clinical translation. The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of these promising natural-based cancer therapies and their potential for revolutionizing cancer treatment (Uddin et al., 2022; Fu et al., 2022).

Review of Literature

Essential element of adcs

Leucine metabolism plays a critical role in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) progression, and leucine deprivation can inhibit leukemic cell growth, induce cell cycle arrest, and enhance differentiation. Additionally, combining leucine deprivation with chemotherapy shows synergistic potential, making it a promising therapeutic strategy, though the precise molecular mechanisms, including its effects on the mTOR pathway, need further investigation (Hasan et al., 2024). Antibody-drug conjugates, or ADCs, are a novel type of targeted cancer therapeutics with the promise to increase therapy efficacy while lowering toxicity. ADCs enable the targeted delivery of extremely effective cytotoxic drugs (Fig. 1) directly to cancer cells by combining the cytotoxic potential of chemotherapeutic agents with the specificity of monoclonal antibodies (Fu et al., 2022). Monoclonal antibodies are proteins that can specifically recognize and bind to certain molecules, known as antigens, that are found on the surface of cancer cells (Fig. 1). By attaching to these antigens, the antibodies can deliver the cytotoxic drug to the cancer cells while sparing healthy cells (Zahavi et al., 2020).

The cytotoxic drugs used in ADCs are potent chemotherapeutic agents that can kill cancer cells by disrupting their DNA or inhibiting their cell division. The drug is attached to the monoclonal antibody through a linker molecule (Fig. 1) that can release the drug only when the antibody binds to the cancer cell (Ponziani et al., 2020). The design of the linker molecule is critical for the effectiveness of the ADC, as it must be stable in circulation and release the cytotoxic drug only within the cancer cell to minimize toxicity to healthy cells (Sheyi et al., 2022). ADCs have shown promising results in preclinical and clinical trials for various types of cancer, including breast cancer, lung cancer, and lymphoma. By selectively targeting cancer cells (Fig. 1), ADCs can reduce the side effects associated with traditional chemotherapy drugs, which can harm healthy cells and cause severe toxicity (Dean et al., 2021). However, the development of ADCs also poses several challenges, such as the optimization of the design of the monoclonal antibody, linker molecule, and cytotoxic drug, as well as the efficient delivery of the ADC to the cancer cells (Dean et al., 2021).

Fig. 1: The components and functions of an ADCs drug, which typically consists of a target antigen, an antibody, a linker, and a cytotoxic drug (Fu et al., 2022).

Structure of ADCs 

An ADCs is composed of three components: a monoclonal antibody (mAb), a linker, and a cytotoxic drug. Monoclonal Antibody (mAb): The mAb is designed to target a specific antigen expressed on the surface of cancer cells (Fig. 2). It is derived from a single clone of immune cells that produce antibodies against the target antigen. The mAb is engineered to have high specificity and affinity for the target antigen to ensure that the ADC selectively binds to cancer cells and avoids binding to healthy cells (Zahavi et al., 2020). 

Fig. 2: ADCs action mechanism is depicted graphically. ADC is made up of three structural sections: antibody, payload, and linker. The antigen on the cell surface distinguishes the monoclonal antibody, and ADC enters the target cell via endocytosis. Cellular proteases cleave the linker, releasing cytotoxic medicines that precisely destroy the target cancer cells (Tsuchikama et al., 2018).

Linker: The linker is a chemical bridge that connects the mAb and the cytotoxic drug. It plays a crucial role in controlling the release of the drug from the ADC and determining its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The linker should be stable in circulation but able to release the cytotoxic drug upon internalization of the ADC into the target cell. There are two types of linkers, cleavable and non-cleavable, depending on whether the linker is designed to break down inside the target cell or not (Sheyi et al., 2022). Cytotoxic Drug: The cytotoxic drug is a highly potent and toxic molecule that can kill cancer cells. The choice of drug depends on the type of cancer being targeted and the desired mechanism of action. Examples of cytotoxic drugs used in ADCs include microtubule inhibitors, DNA-damaging agents, and RNA synthesis inhibitors (Ponziani et al., 2020).

Mechanism of action of ADCs

The mechanism of action of ADCs involves several steps:

Selective binding: The mAb component of the ADC selectively binds to the target antigen expressed on the surface of cancer cells (Fig. 2). This binding specificity ensures that the ADC is delivered to cancer cells, sparing healthy cells from the cytotoxic effects of the drug (Esapa et al., 2023).

Internalization: The ADC is internalized into the cancer cell through receptor-mediated endocytosis. Release of cytotoxic drug: The linker connecting the mAb and cytotoxic drug is cleaved in the intracellular environment, releasing the cytotoxic drug (Fig. 3) (Shi et al., 2022).

Targeted killing

The released cytotoxic drug exerts its toxic effects on the cancer cell, leading to cell death (Fig. 2). The mechanism of action of the cytotoxic drug depends on the type of drug used. For example, microtubule inhibitors disrupt the microtubule network, leading to mitotic arrest and cell death, while DNA-damaging agents cause DNA strand breaks, leading to apoptosis (Fu et al., 2022). Immune response: In some cases, the ADC can also induce an immune response against the cancer cells, further enhancing the anti-tumor activity of the therapy. The immune response can be triggered by several mechanisms, such as antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), and activation of the immune system through the release of tumor antigens (Zahavi et al., 2020).

Key component of oncolytic viruses

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are a class of viruses that can selectively infect and kill cancer cells while sparing normal cells. This unique property of OVs makes them an attractive candidate for cancer therapy. One of the key components of OVs is their ability to selectively target cancer cells. This is achieved through several mechanisms, including the overexpression of certain receptors on the surface of cancer cells that are not present on normal cells. OVs can be engineered to recognize and bind to these receptors, which initiates the viral replication cycle and ultimately leads to the destruction of cancer cells (Jhawar et al., 2017). Another key component of OVs is their ability to induce an immune response. OVs can trigger the release of cytokines and chemokines, which recruit immune cells to the site of infection (Fig. 3). These immune cells can then recognize and kill cancer cells that have been infected by the OVs. In addition, OVs can also enhance the presentation of tumor antigens to the immune system, which can further stimulate an anti-tumor immune response (De Matos et al., 2020). One example of an OVs that has shown promising results in clinical trials is talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a modified herpes simplex virus that has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of melanoma. T-VEC has been shown to selectively replicate in and lyse cancer cells, as well as induce an anti-tumor immune response. In clinical trials, T-VEC has demonstrated an overall response rate of 33% and a complete response rate of 11% in patients with advanced melanoma (Conry et al., 2018).

Genetically engineered oncolytic viruses 

Genetically engineered oncolytic viruses are a promising class of viruses that are being developed for cancer therapy. These viruses are genetically modified to selectively target and kill cancer cells while sparing healthy cells in the body. The development of these viruses involves a few steps, including selecting a virus that can infect and replicate within cancer cells, and then genetically modifying the virus to enhance its specificity for cancer cells and reduce its ability to infect healthy cells (Zhang et al., 2021). One approach to modifying these viruses is to introduce therapeutic genes that can selectively kill cancer cells or stimulate the immune system to attack cancer cells. For example, some genetically engineered oncolytic viruses have been designed to express a cytokine or chemokine that attracts immune cells to the site of the tumor (Fig. 3), while others express a prodrug-converting enzyme that converts a non-toxic prodrug into a toxic drug specifically within cancer cells (Fukuhara et al., 2016).

Fig. 3: Mechanisms of action of oncolytic viral treatment. Local replication of oncolytic virus promotes particular antitumor immunity while its oncolytic actions on distant lesions. Oncolytic virus therapy may be more effective when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy. Arming oncolytic viruses with immunostimulatory genes or cancer therapy genes may also be advantageous (Fukuhara et al., 2016).

Naturally occurring oncolytic viruses 
Naturally occurring oncolytic viruses are a promising class of viruses that can selectively infect and kill cancer cells while sparing healthy cells. These viruses have evolved to exploit the differences between cancer cells and normal cells, such as changes in the expression of cell surface receptors, signaling pathways, and anti-viral defenses. Reovirus, for example, selectively infects cells with an activated Ras signaling pathway, which is commonly found in many cancers. The vesicular stomatitis virus selectively infects cells with low levels of interferon signaling, which are characteristic of many types of cancer cells. Measles virus can specifically target cells that overexpress the CD46 receptor, which is found in many tumor cells (Jhawar et al., 2017). Once inside cancer cells, naturally occurring oncolytic viruses can replicate and induce a cytotoxic effect, which can lead to cancer cell death. Additionally, the infection of cancer cells by oncolytic viruses can trigger an immune response that can further enhance tumor cell killing. The immune response can involve the activation of dendritic cells, the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the recruitment of immune cells such as natural killer cells and T cells to the site of the tumor (Raja et al., 2018). Despite their potential benefits, naturally occurring oncolytic viruses face several challenges in clinical application. One challenge is the potential for pre-existing immunity in the patient to the virus, which can limit the effectiveness of the therapy. Additionally, the virus may not always be able to reach all cancer cells within the body, and some cancer cells may develop resistance to the virus over time (Phan et al., 2018).

Limitations of oncolytic virus therapy 
Despite their potential benefits, oncolytic virus therapy has several limitations that must be addressed to improve their efficacy and clinical application. One limitation is the potential for pre-existing immunity to the virus in the patient, which can limit the effectiveness of the therapy. Patients who have been previously exposed to the virus or have developed immunity to it may not respond to oncolytic virus therapy. Another limitation is the ability of the virus to reach all cancer cells within the body. Some types of cancer cells may be inaccessible to the virus due to physical barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier or the extracellular matrix. Additionally, the virus may be cleared from the body by the immune system before it has a chance to reach the tumor (Raja et al., 2018). In addition to the limitations related to the virus itself, there are also limitations related to the immune response generated by the virus. While the immune response can contribute to tumor cell killing, it can also limit the effectiveness of the therapy by clearing the virus from the body or neutralizing its cytotoxic effects. Furthermore, the immune response may not always be sufficient to eliminate all cancer cells, leading to the potential for recurrence or the development of resistance to the therapy. Finally, there are practical limitations to oncolytic virus therapy that must be considered, such as the cost and complexity of producing and delivering the virus, as well as the potential for side effects or adverse reactions (Fukuhara et al., 2016).

Oncolytic virus as immunotherapy 
Oncolytic virus therapy has emerged as a promising form of immunotherapy for cancer treatment. Oncolytic viruses selectively replicate within and destroy cancer cells, while also triggering an immune response against the tumor. The virus-induced immune response is complex and involves a combination of innate and adaptive immune mechanisms. The initial innate response is triggered by the virus itself and involves the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that attract immune cells to the tumor site. These immune cells, including natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells (DCs), and macrophages, can then recognize and eliminate cancer cells (Rahman et al., 2021).

The adaptive immune response is characterized by the activation of T cells and B cells specific to the tumor antigens. The oncolytic virus can directly stimulate the adaptive immune response by expressing tumor antigens, or it can indirectly stimulate the response by causing the release of danger signals from dying cancer cells. This leads to the activation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and the generation of a tumor-specific T cell response. In addition to its direct effects on the tumor, oncolytic virus therapy can also enhance the efficacy of other immunotherapies, such as checkpoint inhibitors. By inducing an immune response against the tumor, the oncolytic virus can increase the number of T cells that are available to be activated by checkpoint inhibitors, leading to improved outcomes (Marelli et al., 2018). Despite the promise of oncolytic virus immunotherapy, there are several challenges that must be addressed to optimize its efficacy. These include overcoming improving the specificity and potency of the virus, optimizing delivery methods, and developing strategies to overcome immune evasion mechanisms used by tumors (Phan et al., 2018).

CONCLUSION

The development of ADCs and oncolytic viruses has revolutionized cancer therapy, offering a targeted approach to killing cancer cells while minimizing damage to healthy cells. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown promising results, with some patients experiencing complete remission (Coats et al., 2019). However, there are limitations to these therapies, including tumor heterogeneity, off-target effects, and the potential for resistance. These limitations can impact the effectiveness of the therapy and overcoming them remains a challenge for the field. Furthermore, the use of these therapies in combination with other treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy may offer even greater efficacy in fighting cancer (Mokhtari et al., 2017). Overall, ADCs and oncolytic viruses represent an important advance in cancer therapy and highlight the potential for innovative targeted therapies to improve patient outcomes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Dr. Lynne Lawrance and Dr. David Qualtrough deserve grateful acknowledgement for their insightful discussions and organization of research on matters related to current issues. Additionally, the support and discussion of crucial issues in the article by Dr. Lili Ordonez are greatly appreciated. Their provision of multifarious topics significantly boosted my skills. Partial support for this work was provided by the University of the West of England.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There is no conflict of interest in this review paper.

Supplemental Materials:

| 4.00 KB

Article References:

  1. Coats, S., Williams, M., and Soria, J.C., (2019). Antibody–Drug Conjugates: Future Directions in Clinical and Translational Strategies to Improve the Therapeutic IndexAdvances in Antibody-Drug Conjugate Clinical Development. Clinical Cancer Research, 25(18), pp.5441-5448.
  2. Conry, R.M., Westbrook, B., and Norwood, T.G., (2018). Talimogene laherparepvec: First in class oncolytic virotherapy. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 14(4), pp.839-846.
  3. De Matos, A.L., Franco, L.S. and McFadden, G., (2020). Oncolytic viruses and the immune system: the dynamic duo. Molecular Therapy-Methods & Clinical Development, 17, pp.349-358.
  4. Dean, A.Q., Luo, S., and Zhang, B., (2021). January. Targeting cancer with antibody-drug conjugates: Promises and challenges. In MAbs, 13 (1), p. 1951427. Taylor & Francis.
  5. Esapa, B., Jiang, J., and Karagiannis, S.N., (2023). Target Antigen Attributes and Their Contributions to Clinically Approved Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) in Haematopoietic and Solid Cancers. Cancers, 15(6), p.1845.
  6. Fu, Z., Li, S., and Zhang, Y., (2022). Antibody drug conjugate: the “biological missile” for targeted cancer therapy. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 7(1), p.93.
  7. Fukuhara, H., Ino, Y. and Todo, T., (2016). Oncolytic virus therapy: A new era of cancer treatment at dawn. Cancer science, 107(10), pp.1373-1379.
  8. Hasan, M. R., Hall, J., & Ahmed, F. (2024). Exploiting leucine metabolism for therapeutic benefit in acute Myeloid Leukemia. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 19(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.19.1.0135 
  9. Jhawar, S.R., Thandoni, A., and Zloza, A., (2017). Oncolytic viruses-natural and genetically engineered cancer immunotherapies. Frontiers in Oncology, 7, p.202.
  10. Kontermann, R.E., Ungerechts, G. and Nettelbeck, D.M., (2021). Viro-antibody therapy: engineering oncolytic viruses for genetic delivery of diverse antibody-based biotherapeutics. In MAbs, 13(1), p. 1982447). Taylor & Francis.
  11. Marelli, G., Howells, A., and Wang, Y., (2018). Oncolytic viral therapy and the immune system: a double-edged sword against cancer. Frontiers in immunology, 9, p.866.
  12. Mokhtari, R.B., Homayouni, T.S., and Yeger, H., (2017). Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget, 8(23), p.38022.
  13. Phan, M., Watson, M.F., and Diallo, J.S., (2018). Oncolytic viruses on drugs: achieving higher therapeutic efficacy. ACS Infectious Diseases, 4(10), pp.1448-1467.
  14. Ponziani, S., Di Vittorio, G., and Ippoliti, R., (2020). Antibody-drug conjugates: the new frontier of chemotherapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(15), p.5510.
  15. Rahman, M.M. and McFadden, G., (2021). Oncolytic viruses: newest frontier for cancer immunotherapy. Cancers, 13(21), p.5452.
  16. Raja, J., Ludwig, J.M., and Kim, H.S., (2018). Oncolytic virus immunotherapy: future prospects for oncology. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 6(1), pp.1-13.
  17. Sheyi, R., de la Torre, B.G. and Albericio, F., (2022). Linkers: Assurance for Controlled Delivery of antibody-drug conjugate. Pharma- ceutics, 14(2), p.396.
  18. Shi, F., Liu, Y., and Zhang, M., (2022). Disitamab vedotin: a novel antibody-drug conjugates for cancer therapy. Drug Delivery, 29(1), pp.1335-1344.
  19. Tsuchikama, K. and An, Z., (2018). Antibody-drug conjugates: recent advances in conjugation and linker chemistries. Protein & cell, 9(1), pp.33-46.
  20. Uddin ME, Sultana S, and Mahmud S. (2022). Non-biotech students perception of biotechnology and its applications in a university theology faculty students: a brief survey study. Int. J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 4(6), 116-129. https://doi.org/10.34104/ijavs.022.01160129  
  21. Zahavi, D. and Weiner, L., (2020). Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy. Antibodies, 9(3), p.34.
  22. Zhang, S. and Rabkin, S.D., (2021). The discovery and development of oncolytic viruses: are they the future of cancer immunotherapy? Expert opinion on drug discovery, 16(4), pp.391-410.

Article Info:

Academic Editor

Dr. Phelipe Magalhães Duarte, Professor, Department of Veterinary, Faculty of Biological and Health Sciences, University of Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.

Received

September 1, 2024

Accepted

October 21, 2024

Published

October 28, 2024

Article DOI: 10.34104/ajpab.024.01690175

Corresponding author

Md Rakibul Hasan*

Biomedical Science (Clinical Biochemistry), School of Applied Science, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Cite this article

Hasan MR. (2024). Advances in cancer treatment: harnessing antibody-drug conjugates and oncolytic viruses for targeted therapy. Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 6(5), 169-175. https://doi.org/10.34104/ajpab.024.01690175

Views
252
Download
41
Citations
Badge Img
Share