univerge site banner
Original Article | Open Access | Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 2020; 2(2), 24-35. | doi: 10.34104/ajpab.020.24035

Enhancement of Characteristics and Potential Applications of Amylases: A Brief Review

Saptadip Samanta

Abstract

Starch is the major storage carbohydrate of plant products. Amylases are the group of enzymes hydrolyzes starch and related polymers to smaller oligosaccharides and less amount of monosaccharide. Microbes are the major sources of amylases, exploited for large-scale production in different industries. Recently, protein engineering has been applied to improve the structural and physicochemical properties of the enzyme for its potential applications. Amylases are mostly used for liquefaction of starch in the purpose of glucose, maltose, and high fructose-containing syrup preparation, malto-oligosaccharides production, desizing, production of bio-fuel, detergent preparation, waste management, and preparation of digestive aids.

INTRODUCTION

Starch is the major storage plant polysaccharide, cleaved by a group of hydrolytic enzymes known as amylases. Amylolytic enzymes are widely distributed in microbial, plant and animal kingdoms (Saini et al., 2017). Several enzymes like α-amylase, pullulanase, isoamylase, CGTase (Cyclodextrin glycosyl transferase), branching enzymes, α-glucosidase, amylopullulanase, and neopullulanase belong to amylase family. The production of amylases was carried out by submerged fermentation or solid state fermentation; however, later has several potential benefits including cost effectiveness, easy to operate, and better for downstream processing (Sharif et al., 2019). Use of agricultural products in solid sate fermentation reduces the pollution levels as they are commonly destroyed by open burning. Protein engineering is the most powerful approach to increase the physicochemical properties of the enzymes. Enzyme engineering technique is applied for 

preparation of high efficiency, oxidation insensitive, and chelator resistance enzyme for industrial uses (Uddin et al., 2017). Starch-degrading amylolytic enzymes have great significance in biotechnological applications in different sectors. The commercial application of amylase was started from 1894, when Japanese scientist Jokichi Takamine prepared ‘Taka Diastase from Aspergillus oryzae. The era of bacterial amylases was stared form the year 1917 when -amylase was isolated from Bacillus subtilis by the French scientists Boidin and Effront (Md et al., 2014). 

The demand of microbial enzymes for industrial applications is increasing day-by-day. Among the different enzymes, amylases itself have 25% share of the worlds enzyme market. Additionally, about 90% of all liquid detergents contain α-amylase, which make them more efficient for automatic dish-washing (Abdulaal, 2018). In the industrial sectors, microbial amylases are potentially used in different purposes like liquefaction of starch, food preparation, baking, brewing, detergent preparation, desizing, paper making, bio-fuel production, and digestive medicine preparation (Yan and Wu, 2016). 

Types of amylases 

Initially, the term amylase was used to describe the enzyme hydrolyses -1,4 glycosidic bond of amylose, amylopectin, glycogen and related products. However, microbial amylases are commonly classified in different groups. 

1. Exo-Acting Amylases

a. Glucoamylases: Hydrolyze terminal α-1,4 glucosidic linkages from non-reducing ends of the polysaccharide chain and release beta-D-glucose. 

b. -Amylases: Cleave α-1,4 glucosidic bond from the non-reducing ends of the polysaccharide chains. They produce maltose from amylose, and maltose and -limit dextrin from amylopectin and glycogen.

c. α-glucosidase: Cleaves  α-1,4 glucosidic linkage of terminal glucose residue at non-reducing end. It gives single glucose molecule in alpha configuration.

d. Maltogenic amylase: Cleaves α-1,4 glucosidic linkages in the substrates containing only two glucose units at the non-reducing end and releases maltose.

e. Maltotetraose forming amylase: Hydrolyzes starch from its non-reducing end releases maltotetraose.

2. Endo-Acting Amylase: -Amylase: Randomly hydrolyzes α-1,4 glucosidic linkages in polysaccharides containing three or more α-1,4 linked D-glucose units. It produces several maltooligomers, branched dextrins, and maltose. All the products contain reducing group in the alpha-configuration.

3. Debranching Enzymes: Cleave α-1,6 glucosidic linkages and give certain maltooligomers. Pullulanase, isoamylase and other debranching enzymes belong in this class.

4. Cyclodextrin-Producing Enzyme (Cyclodextrin glycosyl transferase): Form α-1,4 glucosidic linkages. It can catalyze different reactions: cyclization, coupling and hydrolysis. The product is cycldextrins and few maltooligomers.

5. Transferases (branching enzyme): Form α-1,6 glucosidic linkages. It transfers a segment of α-1,4 D-glucan chain to the primary hydroxyl group in a similar glucan chain. 

Commonly, amylases are classified into three main groups a-amylases (EC 3.2.1.1), b-amylase (EC 3.2.1.2) and g-amylase (EC 3.2.1.3) (Rani et al., 2015; Oluwadamilare et al., 2019). 

Production of amylases  

Several biotech industries are using large amount of various microbial enzymes like amylase, cellulose, pectinases, protease, lipase, and others. Among these, amylases are maximally used for owing their multipurpose applications. Different microbes are the good sources of amylases (Table 1). Large-scale production of amylases by using microbes is advantageous for their high yielding capacity that minimizes cost/production ratio. At the industrial level, amylase production is carried out in both solid state fermentation (SSF) and submerged fermentation (SmF). Several parameters including nutrient supplementation, pH of the medium, temperature, water activity, and aeration are being considered for optimum growth of the microorganisms as well as enzyme production (Shahen et al., 2019). 

Among the different factors, pH and temperature have greater impact on microbial growth and enzyme production. Fungi are commonly grown in slightly acidic medium; whereas bacteria needs neutral to slight alkaline medium for their growth and enzyme production.  Most of the organism can grow in particular temperature. Mesophilic organisms are able to grow in wide range of temperature 30-45 C, but give thermostable enzymes. Supply of nutrients like carbohydrate, protein, ammonium salts, vitamins (B1, B2, B6, biotin, folic acid, etc.) and minerals (calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper, sulfate, phosphate, etc.) provide energy for cellular growth, supply essential components for protoplasm formation, and create 

favorable conditions for enzyme synthesis (Samanta et al., 2014). Surface area is most important to provide much amount of oxygen. In SSF, surface area is greatly increased, which influences the rate of oxygen transfer, aerobic metabolism, and enzyme production. Initially, SmF was more popular for its easy handling and optimization. Later, SSF has gained more importance for large-scale production of enzymes in view of several economical and engineering advantages. 

Phosphorus (g/kg) 11.1 13.9 1.1 0.7 0.9

SSF is the useful technique for production of enzymes, pharmaceutical components, bio-bleaching agents, food ingredients (Soccol et al., 2017). Most of the time, synthetic or semi-synthetic medium was used in SmF. However, moist agricultural polymeric substrates such as wheat, rice bran, rice husk, cassava, sunflower meal, cottonseed meal, soybean meal, and pearl millet are used in SSF process (Soccol et al., 

2017; Abdulaal, 2018). These substances provide solid support and nutrients (polysaccharides - cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, starch; crude protein; lipids, ions - calcium, magnesium, phosphate) for enzyme synthesis (Table 2). 

Applications of agricultural wastes decrease production cost as well as pollution rate. Supplementation of protein, vitamins (B2, B6 biotin, 

folic acid), and minerals (magnesium, calcium, zinc, copper, phosphorus, sulfur) can increase the rate of enzyme production many folds. Thus, SSF has several advantageous over the SmF (Table 3).

The usual method of process-optimization was alteration of one variable at a time (OVAT). OVAT is a time-consuming, less predictable and inconvenient process as the independent variables are separately optimized. Later, Taguchi method was adopted in this purpose, which was based on computerized statistical calculation. The observed data were feed to the software that gives the indication of optimum production levels by reducing the variance.

The response surface methodology (RSM) was the next approach for process-optimization. Originally, Box and Wilson developed this RSM method in 1951. It is applicable for designing of chemical, physical and biological experiments. In microbiology, this technique is useful in optimization of process to assess the impact of individual factor on overall efficacy 

(Mohandas et al., 2010). RSM simplifies the task of optimization process of enzyme production in industrial scale. RSM is a combination of mathematical and statistical techniques develops an empirical model in which internal statistical calculation determines the interaction among the variables. The objective of RSM is to determine the 

response (output variable) that is influenced by the impact of various independent and cumulative interactive factors (input variables) on the system response. Finally this system provides an indication of optimal operating region. The design of experiments (DOE) is the fundamental part of RSM, which indicates the points where the response should be evaluated.  

Two types of plot i) three-dimensional space, ii) contour plots are used to visualize the shape of the response in graphical system. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is applicable to determine the lack of significance of experimental data fitting in RSM (Most et al., 2018). RSM provides information about the optimum response where each variable interacts among them for maximum yield (Gu et al., 2005; Rao and Satyanarayana, 2007). 

Artificial neural network (ANN) is the recent technique for process-optimization. Basically, it is a mathematical model having an extensive range of applications from biological system to computer engineering. ANN has three layers of connections. First layer is inputs of the independent variables (neuron), second layer is hidden neurons, and third layer represents output neurons. The neurons of the first layer are connected to hidden neurons where several calculations have been done to achieve output response. The algorithm was made on the basis of influencing input neurons and their relations to the output result. The results of ANN are also plotted through contour plots. In case of nonlinear data, ANN methodology is better than RSM as ANN does not require a design to obtain predictive models (Cheok et al., 2012). The advantages and disadvantages of RSM and ANN are given in Table 4.

Protein engineering and approach to modification of amylases

Protein engineering is the step to improve the functional characteristics and stability of the protein. It is mostly applied in fewer proteins (enzyme) those are industrially important. The protein engineering is primarily carried out by site-directed mutagenesis which makes a precise change in the sequence of encoded genes on DNA to alter the amino acid sequence of the desire enzymes. Site-directed mutagenesis technique simplifies DNA manipulations as it lowers the hazards of crude mutagenesis of cells or organisms and easy to isolate the desire mutants from thousands or millions of offspring. 

Site-directed mutagenesis has several importances. It gives idea about structural-functional relationships of gene, helps to develop a mutant protein with novel properties. There are several methods for site-directed mutagenesis. The first method was primer extension (the single-primer method). It is based on in vitro DNA synthesis for preparation of oligonucleotide (7-20 nucleotides long) that carries a base mismatch with the complementary sequence (Uddin et al., 2016). This process is easy to perform in single stranded vector (e.g. M13). 

 

Instead of its simplicity, there are numerous difficulties in single-primer method (Table 5) and the yields of mutants depend upon several factors. Two or three adjacent nucleotides are possible to change by using site-directed mutagenesis which generates an amino acid substitution at the site of interest. However, several oligonucleotides substitutions are time consuming and laborious. Another process for alteration of one amino acid is cassette mutagenesis, a fragment of the gene is replaced by another fragments containing the desired codon. Application of doped oligonucleotides is the alternative approach for desire mutagenesis (Neylon, 2004).

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can efficiently be used for site-directed mutagenesis. Single base mismatched between the amplification primer and the template can include a mutation in amplified DNA. Alternatively, incorporation of mutant base is also possible in any parts of PCR-product. This method is more complicated as it requires four primers for two sets of overlapping DNA and three PCRs (two for two sets of DNA and one to fuse the overlapping segments). Using the commercial kit, PCR mediated mutagenesis is much easier. In this purpose, two methods are adopted. According to Exsite method, desire DNA is present in both strands of vector and amplified through PCR while one of the primers carries the desired mutation. After amplification, linear duplexes carry the mutated gene along with original circular template DNA which can be cleaved by using DpnI endonuclease when the template DNA is derived from E. coli. The second method is Gene Tailoring in which the target DNA is methylated before mutagenesis and the overlapping primers carry the desire mutation. Linear amplicons are produced along with methylated template DNA. After transformation, linear mutated DNA is circularized but host cell McrBC endonuclease digests the methylated template. 

To improve the characteristics of a protein, it is better to mutate the gene at random instead of site-directed mutagenesis. Normally, PCR is error prone due to low fidelity of Taq polymerase and there is high probability of base alteration in amplicons. The random mutation is possible by using error-prone PCR system. This is achieved by different ways: i) introduce a small amount of Mn2+ instead of Mg2+, ii) to include an excess of dGTP and dTTP relative to other two nucleoside phosphates and iii) by using nucleoside analogs. First two methods have possibilities to achieve error rates of one nucleotide per kilobase. Error-prone PCR can randomly change the one amino acid to another. For example, a single point mutation in a valine codon can change it to others encoding phenylalanine, leucine, isoleucine, alanine, aspartate, or glycine. Random insertion/ deletion (RID) process is used for random incorporation or elimination of amino acids and this technique is mediated by ligating an insertion or deletion of a cassette at nearly random locations within the desire gene (Murakami et al., 2003).

Engineering of amylase improves the physicochemical characteristics like pH profile, thermostability, chelator insensitivity, and oxidation resistance.  Altered enzymes are exploited in food, textile, paper, detergent industry and clinical system. The complete three dimensional structures, active site residues, and the position of functional amino acid residues have been determined by using bioinformatics through various softwares (DSMODELER; Geno3D, and Qsite Finder). Several strategies have been applied to make the better quality of enzymes. Exchange of some oxidation prone amino acids (methionine, tryptophan, cysteine, and histidine) by other amino acids (not affected by oxidizing agents) increases oxidation resistance capacity.

Introduction of disulphide bonds by inserting cysteine makes chelator resistance. Insertion of proline increases structural stability. Substitution of deaminating amino acid (asparagines) by Lys or Asp enhances the possibilities of ionic interaction with solvent to improve the stability of the enzyme. Introduction of histidine increases the chance of hydrogen bonds and salt bridge formation for better stability. Moreover, helix capping, removal of deamidating residues, and cavity-filling improve the pH profile and thermostability (Khemakhem et al., 2009; Chi et al., 2010; Kumari et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2013; Mehta and Satyanarayana, 2016). 

Application of amylases  

Amylases are more useful for the industrial and biotechnological applications.  α-amylase, pullulanase, isoamylase, CGTase, branching enzymes, α-glucosidase, amylopullulanase, neopullulanase, maltogenic amylase,  maltotetraose forming amylase, maltohexaose forming amylase, β-amylase, and glucoamylase are used in starch based industry. These enzymes act either endo-acting or exo-acting fashion. α-amylase mostly cleaves α-1,4 glycosidic linkages.  Pullulanase, neopullulanase, and isoamylase can break α-1, 6 glycosidic linkages. Pullulanase, isoamylase, α-glucosidase, β-amylase, and glucoamylase are used for saccharification of partially hydrolyzed starch slurry. Maltogenic amylase, maltotetraose forming amylase, and maltohexaose forming amylase produce maltose, maltotetraose, and maltohexaose respectively from partially hydrolyzed starch. CGTase helps to form cyclodextrin. All these amylases are used in food and pharmaceutical industry, brewing process, ethanol and biofuel production, detergent preparation, animal feed preparation, and waste management (Yan and Wu 2016; Saini et al. 2017; John, 2017). Liquefaction of starch is most important for preparation of glucose and fructose/glucose syrups. Enzymatic treatment produces maltose from starch. Maltose is widely used as sweetener, used in food industries due to its low tendency of crystallization and relatively nonhygroscopic nature.

Malto-oligosaccharides mixture (maltooligomer mix) is obtained from corn starch after its amylolytic digestion. Maltooligomer mix is less sweet than sucrose and low viscous than corn syrup. It is mainly used as substitute of sucrose. Maltotetraose syrup is the ingredient of geriatric and infant foods. It is used as replacement of sucrose without altering the taste and flavour of the food. This application also controls the freezing points of the frozen foods. Amylases are also used for the clarification of beer and fruit juices, which improve the quality and clarity of the products (Kumari et al., 2012; Dey and Banerjee, 2014). Application of α-amylase in desizing process is one of the oldest uses of amylase in industrial sector. Starch paste is used as sizer during weaving and enzymatic treatment removes starch sizer from cotton fabrics. Although, there are several processes of desizing, but use of thermostable α-amylase in this purpose is more convenient (Table 6). 

Alcohol and biofuel production is carried out by using α-amylase and saccharifing amylases which hydrolyze the starch into smaller saccharides followed by alcoholic fermentation. Starchy wastes promote microbial growth and environmental pollution. Amylolytic treatment of starchy wastes can produce valuable products such as microbial biomass, animal feed, and biofuel (Kumar et al., 2014). 

Amylases, especially prepared through protein engineering bear chelator resistance, alkalophilic and oxidant insensitive characteristics are potentially used in enzyme based detergent formulation (Sundarram and Murthy, 2014; Kumari et al., 2012). The fungal α-amylase from Aspergillus oryzae is used as digestive aids for the treatment of indigestion. The liquid and capsule formulations of the digestive medicines are available in the market (Table 7).

CONCLUSION

In the era of biotechnology, microbes are most useful for mankind. They are exploited for antibiotic production, enzyme preparation, biomass and single cell protein synthesis, production of medicinal components (amino acids, vitamins, steroid), and waste management (Rahman et al., 2019). Microbial enzymes have multidimensional uses starting from food industry to pollution control. Among the microbial enzymes, α-amylase has promising market value. The demand of microbial α-amylases is increasing day-by-day. Several agro-industrial residues are competently used in SSF to reduce production cost for large scale enzyme preparation. This step is an eco-friendly process and a great advancement towards clean world. An approach to protein engineering makes the enzyme more thermostable, oxidant resistant, chelator insensitive along with better pH profile. All these factors increase the potential uses of amylases in different sectors. Amylases, particularly α-amylase are efficiently used in food, pharmaceutical, textile, detergent, paper, and brewing industry. Thus, amylases are fairly excellent industrial enzymes and the demand would always be high in near future. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author has no conflict of interest.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author is grateful to Midnapore College, Midnapore, West Bengal, India, for providing all kinds of facilities to prepare this manuscript. 

Article References:

  1. Abdulaal W.H. (2018). Purification and characterization of α-amylase from Trichoderma pseudokoningii. BMC Biochem. 19(1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12858-018-0094-8  
  2. Almanaa T.N.,  Sami A. Alyahya S.A. (2020). Solid state fermentation of amylase production from Bacillus subtilis D19 using agro-residues. J King Saud University-Science. 32(2): 1555-1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2019.12.011 
  3. Balkan B., Ertan F. (2007). Production of α-amylase from Penicillium chrysogenum under solid-state fermentation by using some agricultural by-products. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 45: 439-442. 
  4. Cheok C.Y., Chin N.L., Yusof Y.A., Talib R.A., Law C.L. (2012). Optimization of total phenolic content extracted from Garcinia mangostana Linn. hull using response, surface methodology versus artificial neural network. Ind. Crop. Prod. 40: 247–253.
  5. Chi M.C., Chen Y.H., Wu T.J., Lo H.F., Lin L. L. (2010). Engineering of a truncated α-amylase of Bacillus sp. strain TS-23 for the simultaneous improvement of thermal and oxidative stabilities. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 109: 531-38.
  6. De Souza, P. M. and Magalhaes P. O. E. (2010). Application of microbial-amylase in industry: a review. Brazilian J. Microbiol. 41: 850–861.
  7. Dey T.B., Banerjee R. (2014). Application of decolourized and partially purified polygalact-uronase and α-amylase in apple juice clarification. Braz. J. Microbiol. 45: 97–104.
  8. Elmansy E.A., Asker M.S., El-Kady E.M. (2018). Production and optimization of α-amylase from thermo-halophilic bacteria isolated from different local marine environments. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 42(31). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-018-0033-2
  9. Gopinath S.C.B.,  Anbu P.,  Md. Arshad M.K., Lakshmipriya T., Voon C.H.,  Uda Hashim U., Suresh V., Chinni, S.V. (2017). Biotechnological processes in microbial amylase production. BioMed Research International. Vol. 2017, Article ID 1272193, 9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1272193 
  10. Gu X.B., Zheng Z.M., Yu H.Q., Wang J., Liang F.L., Liu R.L. (2005). Optimization of medium constituents for a novel lipopeptide production by Bacillus subtilis MO-01 by a response surface method. Process Biochem. 40: 3196–3201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.02.011  
  11. Jana M., Maity C., Samanta S., Pati B.R., Islam S.S., Mondal K.C. (2013). Salt-independent thermophilic α-amylase from Bacillus megaterium VUMB109: An efficacy testing for preparation of malto-oligosaccharides. Industrial Crops and Products. 41: 386–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.04.048 
  12. John J. (2017). Amylases- bioprocess and potential applications: A review. Intl. J. Bioinformat. and Biological Sci. 5(2): 41-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2321-7111.2017.00 006.3
  13. Khemakhem B., Ali M.B., Juy M., Haser R., Bejar S. (2009). Engineering of the -amylase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus US100 for detergent incorporation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102: 380-89.
  14. Kumar P., Pant D.C., Kalia V.C. (2014). Ecobiotechnological strategy to enhance efficiency of bioconversion of wastes into hydrogen and methane. Indian J. Microbiol.  54: 262–267.
  15. Kumari A., Singh K., Kayastha A.M. (2012). -Amylase: General Properties, Mechanism and Biotechnological Applications-A Review. Curr. Biotechnol.  1: 98-107. 
  16. Md. Ekhlas Uddin, Pulak Maitra, Hossain Md. Faruquee, Md. Firoz Alam, (2014). Isolation and characterization of proteases enzyme from locally isolated Bacillus sp., American Journal of Life Sciences. 2(6), 338-344. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20140206.12
  17. Mehta D., Satyanarayana T. (2016). Bacterial and archaeal α-Amylases: diversity and amelioration of the desirable characteristics for industrial applications. Front Microbiol. 7: 1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01129 
  18. Mohandas B.S., Rao R.R.K., Rao G.H. (2010). Statistical optimization and neural modeling of amylase production from banana peel using Bacillus subtilis MTCC 441. Int. J. Food Eng. 6: 1-6
  19. Mojsov K. (2012). Microbial α-amylases and their industrial applications: a review. Int. J. Management, IT and Eng. 2: 583–609.
  20. Most Morium Begum, Md. Ekhlas Uddin, Sezanur Rahman, Md. Rezanur Rahman, Md. Faruquee. (2018). Genetic variation, character association, and genetic divergence analysis among Mustard (Brassica spp. L.) in Bangladesh.  Biotechnol. Res. 4(1): 40-47, http://www.biotechnologicalresearch.com/index.php/BR/article/view/88 
  21. Murakami H., Hohsaka T., Sisido M. (2003). Random insertion and deletion mutagenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 231: 53–64.
  22. Neylon C. (2004). Chemical and biochemical strategies for the randomisation of protein encoding DNA sequences: library construction methods for directed evolution. Nucl. Acids Res. 32: 1448–1459.
  23. Oluwadamilare L.A., Dzorbenya A.G., Adekunle F. (2019). A review of literature on isolation of bacteria α- amylase. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 6(1): 1333-1342. 
  24. Prakasham R.S., Subba Rao C., Sreenivas Rao R., Sarma P.N. (2007). Enhancement of acid amylase production by an isolated Aspergillus awamori. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102(1): 204-211. 
  25. Rahman MA, Ahmad T, Mahmud S, Barman NC, Haque MS, Uddin ME, and Ahmed R. (2019). Isolation, identification and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Salmonella spp. from locally isolated egg samples, Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.34104/ajpab.019.019111 
  26. Rani K., Rana R., Datt S. (2015). Review on characteristics and application of amylases. Int J. Microbiol Bioinform.  5(1):1-5.
  27. Rao J.L.U.M., Satyanarayana T. (2007). Improving production of hyper thermostable and high maltose forming α-amylase by an extreme thermophile Geobacillus thermoleo-vorans using response surface methodology and its applications. Bioresour. Technol. 98: 345–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.12.022  
  28. Saini R., Saini H.S., Dahiya A. (2017). Amylases: Characteristics and industrial applications. J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochem.  6(4): 1865-1871
  29. Samanta S., Das A., Jana A., Kar S., Mondal, K.C. (2014). Thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics of an -amylase from Bacillus licheniformis SKB4. Acta Biolgica Szegediensis. 58(2): 147-156.
  30. Sharif IH, Jamal MAHM, and Uddin ME. (2019). Assessment and biomonitoring of the effect of rapeseeds oil on wister rat organs. Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 1(4), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.34104/ajpab.019.0192029 
  31. Shahen MZ, Mahmud S, Rony MH,  Al Maruf MA, Uddin ME and Alam MS. (2019). Effect of antibiotic susceptibility and inhibitory activity for the control of growth and survival of microorganisms of extracts of Calendula officinalis, Eur. J. Med. Health Sci. 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.34104/ejmhs.019
  32. Sindhu R., Suprabha G.N., Shashidhar S. (2009). Optimization of process parameters for the production of a-amylase from Penicillium janthinellum (NCIM 4960) under solid state fermentation. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 3(9): 498-503.
  33. Soccol C.R., da Costa E.S.F., Letti L.A.J., Karp S.G., Vandenberghe L.P.d-S. (2017). Recent developments and innovations in solid state fermentation. Biotechnology Research and Innovation. 1: 52-71  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biori.2017.01.002    
  34. Sundarram A., Murthy T.P.K. (2014). α-Amylase production and applications: a review. J. Appl. and Env. Microbiol. 2(4): 166–175.
  35. Uddin M. E., Ahmad T., Moniruzzaman M., Ray S. K., and Ahammed T. (2017). Thermotolerant extracellular proteases produced by Bacillus subtilis isolated from local soil that representing industrial applications.  J. of Pure and Applied Microbiol. 11(2), 733-741. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.11.2.12   
  36. Uddin ME., Ahmad T., Nazmuzzaman M., and Manik M. A. (2016). Standardization and Improving in Vitro Micropropagation of Night Jasmine (Cestrum nocturnum L.). Plant Archives, 16(1): 279-284. http://www.plantarchives.org/PDF%2016%20-%201/279-284%20(PA3-3214).pdf 
  37. Yan S., Wu G. (2016). Analysis on evolutionary relationship of amylases from archaea, bacteria and eukaryota. W. J. Microbiol Biotechnol. 32(24): 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-015-1979-y  
  38. Yang H., Liu L., Shin H.D., Chen R.R., Li J. Du G., (2013). Structure- based engineering of histidine residues in the catalytic domain of alpha-amylase from Bacillus subtilis for improved protein stability and catalytic efficiency under acidic conditions. J. Biotechnol. 164: 59–66.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.12.007 

Article Info:

Md. Ekhlas Uddin Dipu, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Gono Bishwabidalay, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Received

March 8, 2020

Accepted

April 3, 2020

Published

April 18, 2020

Article DOI: 10.34104/ajpab.020.24035

Corresponding author

Saptadip Samanta

Department of Physiology, Midnapore College, Midnapore, Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal, India.

Cite this article

Samanta S. (2020).  Enhancement of characteristics and potential applications of amylases: a brief review. Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 2(2), 24-35. https://doi.org/10.34104/ajpab.020.24035 

Related Articles

Views
401
Download
1498
Citations
Badge Img
Share