univerge site banner
Original Article | Open Access | Int. J. Mat. Math. Sci., 2020; 2(2), 16-28. | doi: 10.34104/ijmms.020.016028

First Principles Study of Structural, Elastic, Electronic and Optical Features of the Non-centrosymmetric Superconductors SrMGe3 (Where M= Ir, Pt, and Pd)

Mst. Jannatul Naefa Mail Img ,
Md. Atikur Rahman* Mail Img Orcid Img

Abstract

BaNiSn3-type superconductors SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3, and SrPtGe3 have a critical temperatures of 1.80 K, 1.49K and 1.0K respectively have been reported recently. Employing the first-principles method based on the density functional theory, we have examined the physical properties including structural, elastic, electronic, and optical phenomena of all these structures. For all the phases our optimized lattice parameters are well in accord with the experimental lattice parameters. The positive elastic constants of these compounds revealed that these superconductors possess mechanical stability in nature. The values of Pughs ratio and Poissons ratio ensured the brittle manner of these compounds and anisotropic behavior is ensured by the values of the anisotropy factor. The soft nature of all compounds is confirmed by the bulk modulus analysis. The values of Vickerss hardness indicate that the rigidity decreased in the order of SrIrGe3>SrPtGe3>SrPdGe3. The overlapping of the conduction band and valence band at the Fermi level indicates the zero band gaps and metallic nature of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3, and SrPtGe3. The chief contribution around the Fermi level arises from Ir-5d, Ge-4s, 4p states for SrIrGe3 and Ge-4s, 4p states for SrPdGe3 and Pt-5d, Ge-4s, 4p for SrPtGe3 compound. The study of DOS, Mulliken atomic populations, and charge density ensured the existence of complex bonding in SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3, and SrPtGe3 with ionic, covalent, and metallic characteristics. The analysis of the dielectric function also ensured the metallic behavior of all these compounds. 

INTRODUCTION

 The noncentrosymmetric superconductors have attracted much consideration having their unique superconducting properties caused by the Rashba-type antysymmetric spin-orbit coupling which leads to a mixing of the spin-singlet and spin-triplet states [1]. The investigations of specific conditions for superconductivity (SC) in non-centrosymmetric compounds were induced in 2004 by the discovery of heavy-fermion SC in CePt3Si with the superconducting critical temperature, Tc = 0.75 K [2]. Since the first heavy fermion noncentrosymmetric superconductor CePt3Si was discovered [2], a lot of similar systems have been found. In recent years, BaNiSn3-type LnTX3 compounds (Ln = lanthanide element, T = transition metal and X = Ge, Si) have been extensively investigated because of their interesting physical properties such as valance fluctuations [3-5] and different magnetic properties [6-11]. Moreover, CeIrGe3 [12], CeIrSi3 [13-15] CeCoGe3 [16, 17] and CeRhSi3 [18, 19] with BaNiSn3-type structure have been found to exhibit pressure induced superconductivity. This finding is very interesting because along the c-axis their structure lacks inversion symmetry. These Ce-based noncentrosymmetric superconductors (NCS) are placed close to a magnetic quantum critical point, making it difficult to show the effects of ASOC and inversion symmetry breaking on superconductivity. 

In order to analysis the impact of inversion symmetry breaking on superconductivity, nonmagnetic Rashba-type NCS must be discovered and studied because the extra complications that originate from strong f-electron correlations can be prohibited. Among compounds adopting the tetragonal BaNiSn3-type structure [20], the phenomenon of superconductivity has been reported for LaPdSi3 (Tc = 2.60-2.65 K [21, 22]), LaRhSi3 (Tc = 2.16 K [22]), LaPtSi3 (Tc = 1.52 K [23]), BaPtSi3 (Tc = 2.25 K [24]), CaPtSi3 (Tc = 2.3 K [25]), CaIrSi3 (Tc = 3.3 K [26]), SrPdGe3 (Tc = 1.49 K [27]), and SrPtGe3 (Tc = 1.0 K [27]). Despite of the deficiency of centrosymmetry in the crystal structure, all these systems exhibit a typically BCS-like SC, except for CaIrSi3 [26] having a weakly anisotropic superconducting gap. The electronic properties of these BaNiSn3-type NCS can affect their superconducting properties caused by electron-phonon interactions. In turn, in this family, pressure-inducted heavy-fermion SC has been detected in CeCoGe3 (Tc = 0.7 [28]), CeRhSi3 (Tc = 0.72 [29]), and CeCoGe3 (Tc = 0.7 CeIrGe3 (Tc = 1.6 K [30]). 

In the current study, we therefore make a plan to investigate the physical properties including structural properties, elastic properties, electronic properties, optical properties of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 compounds. We have used the density functional theory (DFT) based on CASTEP computer program to discuss the detailed physical characteristics of these compounds. The remaining parts of this research work are organized as follows: the computation detail is given in second section then the result and discussion are given and finally the summary of our study is given. 

THEORITICAL METHODS

The investigation of different properties of SrMGe3 (where M= Ir, Pt, and Pd) compounds have been carried out using Cambridge Serial Total Energy Package (CASTEP) code based on the density functional theory (DFT) [31, 32]. The Ge-4s24p2, Sr-4s24p65s2 and Ir-5d76s2; Ge-4s24p2, Sr-4s24p65s2 and Pd-4d10; Ge-4s24p2, Sr-4s24p65s2 and Pt-5d96s1 are treated as the valance electrons in the case of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 respectively for pseudo atomic calculations. The wave functions are expanded using plane-wave cut-off energy 550eV with 10×11×13 grids for SrIrGe3 and SrPtGe3 compound and energy 500eV with 10×10×12 grids for SrPdGe3 based on Monkhorst-Pack scheme [33] in the primitive cell. The Brodyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) energy minimizing technique has been observed to optimize the crystal structure [34]. 

The parameters for the geometry optimization convergence criteria were imputed at 1.0 × 10-5 eV/atom for the total energy, 0.03 eV/Å for maximum force, 0.05GPa for maximum stress and 0.001 Å for maximum displacement. The elastic stiffness constants are attained using the stress-strain method [35]. 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1 Structural Properties - All the three noncentrosymmetric SrMGe3 (M= Ir, Pt, and Pd) compounds investigated here belong to BaNiSn3-type tetragonal crystal structure with the space group I4/mmm (139). Each primitive cell unit cell contains one Sr atom at the 2a(0.00, 0.00, 0.00) position, one M atom at 2a(0.00, 0.00, ZT), one Ge1 atom at 4b(0.00, 0.50, ZGe1) and two Ge2 atom at the 2a(0.00, 0.00, ZGe2) sites.  This three internal parameters (ZT, ZGe1 and ZGe2) and two lattice parameters (a and c) characterize the crystal structure of all these compounds. The calculated lattice parameters, tetragonal ratio, volume, bulk modulus and internal parameters are listed in Table 1 for all the investigated NCS with the available experimental values. Here the slight deviation of the optimized lattice parameters from the experimental values ensures the accuracy of our DFT based calculations. However in some cases we have observed that the optimized lattice parameters are slightly greater than the experimental values which happened due to the over estimation of the GGA based calculations. 

Fig 1: The crystal structures of SrMGe3 (M=Ir, Pd and Pt); (a) Two dimensional conventional unit cell and (b) Three dimensional primitive unit cell.

Table 1: Structural parameters for SrMGe3 (M=Ir, Pd and Pt) compounds and their comparison with the available experimental results.

3.2 Elastic constants and mechanical properties - The elastic constants of any material are strongly correlated with the long-wavelength phonon spectrum; in this manner the elastic properties of super conducting material must be executed [37]. The important information about the dynamic features of crystalline materials is also provided by the elastic constants. The materials stability, ductility, brittleness, anisotropy, stiffness behavior and bonding nature in atom are obtained from the study of mechanical properties. According to the Hooks law, the elastic constants were carrying on from a linear fit of the evaluated stress-strain function [38]. The calculated elastic constants of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 superconductors are represent in Table 2. For tetragonal phase, the elastic constants need to content the stability conditions known as the Born stability criteria [39].

C11 > 0; C33 >0; C66 >0; C44 >0

C11 + C12 - 2C13 >0; C11 - C12 >0             (1)                                                     

2(C11 + C12) + 4C13 + C33 >0

We have listed the observed elastic constants for SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 superconductors in Table 2. From below Table 2 we can see that the observed values are positive and gratified the above criteria. Hence we can say that the SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 superconductors are mechanically stable in nature. It is seen that C11 is significantly smaller than C33, indicating that the chemical bonding strength in the (100) and (010) directions is significantly weaker than the bonding strength in the (001) direction. The value of C44 is obviously smaller than C66, which demonstrates that it is easier for shear deformation to occur along the (001) direction in comparison with the (010) direction.

Table 2: The calculated single independent elastic constants Cij (in Gpa) of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 superconductor.

According to the Voigt-Reuss-Hill (VRH) average schemes [41], the shear modulus (G), the bulk modulus (B), Poisson ratio (v) and Youngs modulus (E) can be calculated for the tetragonal system. The bulk and shear moduli given as follows:

B_V=  (2C_11+2C_12+C_33+4C_13)/9                            (2)

B_R=C^2/M                                                                           (3)

G_V=  (M+3C_11-〖3C〗_12+12C_44+6C_66)/30        (4)

G_R=〖15[(18B_V)/C^2 +6/((C_11-C_12 ) )+6/C_44 +3/C_66 ]〗^(-1)            (5)

Where〖 C〗^2=(C_11+C_12 ) C_33-2C_13^2  

And M=C_11+C_12+2C_33-4C_13 

B=(B_V+B_R)/2                         (6)

G=(G_V+G_R)/2                   (7)

We have calculated the Poissons ratio (v) and the Youngs modulus (E) using the following equations, 

E=9GB/(3B+G)                                        (8)

v=(3B-2G)/2(3B+G)                                  (9)

The calculated values of Bulk modulus B, Shear modulus G, Young modulus E, B/G and v for the compounds SrMGe3 (M = Ir, Pd and Pt) are listed in Table 3.  It has been seen from Table 3 that the values of B of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 are less than 100 GPa [42] indicating that these are relatively soft materials. The stiffness properties of a compound can be described by Young modulus E. The larger value of E signifies the more stiffness of a compound [43]. These compounds also show the larger bulk modulus B than the shear modulus G expressing the limitation of mechanical stability for these compounds by G [44]. 

Generally, it is extremely helpful to predict the type of bonding force which makes a solid to reveal ductility or brittleness behavior. The shear modulus G is denoted by the resistance to plastic deformation and bulk modulus B is defined by the resistance to fracture so that the flexibility of a material is observed by the well-known ratio B/G called as Pough ratio [43].

Table 3: Calculated polycrystalline bulk modulus B (GPa), shear modulus G (GPa), Youngs modulus E (GPa), B/G values, Poissons ratio v, elastic anisotropy index AU and Vickers hardness Hv (GPa) of SrMGe3 (M = Ir, Pd and Pt).

The ductile compound processes the larger value of B⁄G (>1.75) else the compound will be brittle. The lower value of Poisson ratio (ν<0.26) shows the brittleness properties of a compound and for any other values the compound will be ductile. According to these conditions SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 process the brittleness manner. The universal anisotropy index A^U can be evaluated by using the following equation [45]:

A^U=  (5G_V)/G_R +B_V/B_R -6                       (10)

If AU = 0 the crystal is entirely isotropic and any deviation from this value represent the degree of anisotropy in the crystal. According to the values of AU exhibited in Table 3 our studied compounds show anisotropic behavior. It is also obvious that SrPdGe3 is more anisotropic among them. The Vickers hardness which is also an important mechanical property of a material is obtained by the following equation proposed by Chen et al. [46].

H_V=2〖(K^2 G)〗^0.585-3                 (11)

In Table 3 the values of Vickers hardness are tabulated. It is evident from Table 3 that SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 are relatively soft materials which are contradicted by softness/hardness characteristics presented by the bulk modulus B.

3.3 Electronic Properties and Chemical Bonding - The electronic band structure, partial density of states (PDOS) and total density of states (TDOS) of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 have been studied and discussed to gain the deep insights into the electronic properties of these superconductors. The Fermi level between conduction band and valance band is indicated in diagram along with the range of total band structure. The electronic band structure diagrams for these compounds are depictured in Fig 2. In these diagrams we can see that the valance band and conduction band are overlapped at Fermi level (EF) and there is no band gap appeared at EF. Since there is no band gap it can be implies that these compounds under study shows metallic behavior and the metallic nature of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 implies that these compound might be superconductor [47]. The densities of states (partial and total) of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 compounds are plotted on Fig 3. The lower valance bands for SrIrGe3 (-17.59eV to -16.38eV) and for SrPdGe3 (-18.73eV to -17.57eV) are consists from Sr-4p state which is dominant for these compounds and for SrPtGe3 (-18.07eV to -16.83eV) consist from Sr-4s, 5s state. The middle valance band for SrIrGe3 (to be found at -11.64eV to -6.49eV), for SrPdGe3 (to be found at -12.48eV to -7.13eV) and for SrPtGe3 (to be found at 12.20eV to 6.68eV) are made up from Ge-4s state.

For SrIrGe3 the upper valance band (to be found at -5.72eV to 0eV) is mainly originates from Ir-5d, Ge-4p states and Pd-4d, Ge-4p for SrPdGe3 (to be found at -6.24eV to 0eV).For SrPtGe3 the upper valance band (to be found at -6.36eV to 0eV) is mainly originates from Pt-5d and Ge-4p states. The contribution of Ge-4p states is dominant for all compounds. The conduction band mainly contributed from Ir-5d and Ge-4s, 4p states in case of SrIrGe3 and Ge-4s, 4p state for SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 whereas Ge-4s, 4p orbital is dominant for all compounds. At the Fermi level mainly contribution comes from Ir-5d, Ge-4s, 4p states for SrIrGe3 and Ge-4s, 4p states for SrPdGe3 and Pt-5d, Ge-4s,4p for SrPtGe3 compounds. 

Fig 2: The electronic band structure of (a) SrIrGe3, (b) SrPdGe3 and (c) SrPtGe3 ternary intermetallics along high symmetry direction in the Brillouin zones.

Fig 3: Total and partial density of states for (a) SrIrGe3, (b) SrPdGe3 and (c) SrPtGe3.

The calculated values of density of states at the Fermi level are 1.96eV states eV-1 fu-1, 2.39eV states eV-1 fu-1 and 1.52 states eV-1 fu-1 for SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 respectively. Which type of bond exists in these compounds is clearly known by study of Mulliken atomic population. Here we have study The Mulliken atomic population of these compounds and presented in Table 4. From Table 4 we have seen that Sr and Ge atoms have positive charge while Ir contains negative charge for SrIrGe3 compound which indicates the charge transferring from Sr and Ge atoms to Ir atom. Similarly the charge transfers from Sr and Ge atoms to Pd atom in case of SrPdGe3 compound and charge transferring from Sr and Ge atoms to Pt atom in case of SrPtGe3 compound. The zero value of band population exhibits a perfect ionic bond and greater than zero initiative the increase of covalence bond [48].               

Table 4: Mulliken atomic populations of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 compounds.

The values of population of Ge-Ir, Ge-Pd are greater than zero, which indicates that these bonds are covalent. The values of population of Ge-Ge, Ge-Pt are negative and indicating the ionic character. These results accrue with the result of density of states (DOS) analysis. In order to get clear insight into the bonding the total charge density map for SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 compounds are shown in Fig 4. The blue and red colors indicate the low and high electron densities respectively. We observe a clear overlapping of charge density distribution between the nearest Ge, Ir and Ge, Pd atoms indicating the covalent nature of Ge-Ir for SrIrGe3 and Ge-Pd bonds for SrPdGe3 compound. These results show a good consent with the DOS analysis. There is no overlapping of electron (charge) distribution among Sr atoms indicating the ionic feature Sr-Sr bonds of SrIrGe3 and SrPdGe3 compounds. For SrPtGe3 compound the Sr and Ge atoms shows the covalent nature and Pt shows the ionic nature. The ionic character is consequence of the metallic nature [49] viewing the metallic behavior of Sr-Sr, and Pt-Pt bonds.

Fig 4: Total charge density of (a) SrIrGe3, (b) SrPdGe3 and (c) SrPtGe3 compounds.

Hence from the overall detailed study of DOS, Mulliken atomic population and total charge density of SrMGe3 (M=Ir, Pd, Pt) superconductors we can conclude that all compounds have ionic, covalent and metallic bonds which is the common characteristics of BaNiSn3 structured compounds.

3.4 Optical properties - Using the frequency dependent dielectric function ε(ω) = ε1(ω)+iε2(ω), the optical properties of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 superconductors have been studied. The investigation of the optical function of solids provides excessive information of the electronic properties. From the momentum matrix elements between the unfilled and filled electronic states the imaginary part, ε2(ω) of dielectric function can be obtain [50]. This is express by the following function,

ε_2 (ω)=(2e^2 π )/(Ωε_0 ) ∑_(k,v ,c)▒〖|ѱ_k^c |u.r|ѱ_k^v |〗^2  δ(E_k^c-E_k^v-ℏω)      (12)

Where u represent the polarization of the incident electric field, ω as the frequency of light, Ω represent the until cell volume, , e is define as the charge of electron, |ѱ_k^c |  and |ѱ_k^v | represent respectively the conduction band wave function and valance band wave function at K. By using Kramers-Kronig transformation the real part ε1 (ω) can be obtained from the value of ε2(ω). The optical properties such as absorption spectrum, loss function, conductivity, dielectric function, reflectivity and refractive index are evaluated by eqs (49)-(54) in ref [51].

The absorption spectra offer useful information about the maximum solar energy exchange efficiency and it show how far light of specific wavelength is passes through a material before being absorbed. The absorption spectra of SrMGe3 (M=Ir, Pd, Pt) are shown in Fig 5(a). Fig 5(a) shows the absorption coefficients of all the phases which begin at 0 eV due to their metallic nature. It has been seen that the nature of absorption curves are almost same for these compounds. Two strong peaks (absorption) are found in the visible and ultraviolet regions for all phases at different energy ranges. These peaks are weak in the visible region but continuously increase in the ultraviolet region and reach maximum value at 9.00 eV. According to this outcome we can say that SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 compounds are promising for absorbing materials in the UV region. All the compounds show rather good absorption coefficient in the 9.0 eV to 23.85 eV regions. The spectra of reflectivity of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 are shown in Fig 5(b). Reflectivity is a function of incident light energy and is a measure of the ability of a surface to reflect radiation incident on it. It is attained by the ratio of the energy of the wave reflected from a surface to the energy of the wave incident on the surface [52].  From Fig 5(b) we can see that the reflectivity starts from the value of 0.60 for SrIrGe3, 0.98 for SrPdGe3 (it is also the maximum value) and 0.59 for SrPtGe3 with zero photon energy. The maximum value of reflectivity appears at 12.36 eV energy is 0.69 for SrIrGe3 compound, at 13.45 eV energy is 0.69 for SrPtGe3 compound. It is also evident that all phases can be used as excellent coating materials in the energy range 1.5eV to 14.48 eV.

The reflectivity of these compounds is much higher in the ultraviolet and IR regions. Therefore all the compounds, with roughly similar reflectivity spectra, show good promise as good coating materials in the ultraviolet and infrared regions. The conductivity spectrum of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 are shown in Fig 5(c). The conductivity is an optoelectronic phenomenon in which electrical conductivity of a material rises as a result of absorbing of photons. It helps us to mark out the material will be semiconductor, conductor or superconductor. The investigated conductivity spectra with photon energy of SrMGe3 (M=Ir, Pd, Pt) are shown in Fig 5(c). The photoconductivity starts with zero photon energy due to the reason that the materials have no band gap which is apparent from band structure signifying the metallic behaviors of these phases. The photoconductivity is maxima at 5.18 eV for SrIrGe3 and 2.84 eV for SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 compound. No photoconductivity occurs above 26.19 eV.

The energy loss function is defined as the energy loss of a fast electron when it traverses in the material [53]. The frequency at which maximum energy loss happened is known as the Bulk plasma frequency ωp of the material which emerges at ε1 (ω) =0 and ε2 (ω) is less than one [54, 55]. The energy loss spectra for all these three compounds under investigation are plotted in Fig 5(d). The loss function is maxima at 14.90 eV for SrIrGe3 and SrPtGe3 compound and 12.44 eV for SrPdGe3 compound. These materials become transparent when the plasma frequency is lower than that of incident frequency.

Fig 5: The optical functions (a) Absorption, (b) Reflectivity, (c) Conductivity, and (d) Loss function of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3. (e) Dielectric function of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 (f) Refractive index of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3.

Dielectric function is a crucial factor to know the energy loss and polarizability of a material, while electromagnetic wave passes through it. The real and imaginary parts of dielectric function are shown in Fig 5(e) for SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 compounds. It is obvious from the study of chemical bonding and electronic structure that these compounds show metallic behavior in nature. Hence it is necessary to include the Drude term to the dielectric function [53, 56, and 57]. 

The unscreened plasma frequency 3 eV and damping (relaxation energy) 0.05 eV have been used in the Drude term. Despite some variation in heights and position of peaks, the overall features of our calculated optical spectra of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 are almost similar. It has been observed that for all the phases the real part ε1 (ω) of the dielectric function became zero at around 0.16 eV, which corresponds to the energy at which the absorption coefficients nearly zero (Fig 5a), reflectivity shows a sharp drop (Fig 5b) and the conductivity (Fig 5c) increases sharply. The large negative value ε1 (ω) of dielectric constant exhibit the Drude-like behaviors which is common feature for metallic system From Fig 5(e) we have observed that real part of the dielectric function comes to zero from below and the imaginary part of the dielectric function comes to zero from above which also ensure the metallic nature of these compounds.

When light is entered into a material then it is refracted or bent. So how much light is refracted or bent when it traversing through a material, this quantity is measured by a dimensionless parameter called the refractive index [58]. The idea of refractive index of an optical material is very effective for its use in optical tools such as waveguides, photonic crystals, etc. 

The refractive indices in terms of real and imaginary of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 are displayed in Fig 5(f). The imaginary part describes the amount of absorption loss and the real part signifies the phase velocity of electromagnetic wave when propagates throughout the material. For all superconductors the static refractive index n (0) is found to have the value 104.

COCLUSION

In this research work, we have performed the detailed physical properties including structural, elastic, electronic, chemical bonding and optical properties of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 by using CASTEP code based on the density functional theory. The optimize lattice parameters have a slight variation from available experimental data for all compounds. The studies of Pughs ratio values revealed that all compounds are brittle in nature and the value of Poissons ratio suggests that central force exists in these compounds. The bulk modulus indicated the soft behavior of SrIrGe3, SrPdGe3 and SrPtGe3 compounds. The study of elastic constant ensured that all compounds are stable in nature and show anisotropic manner. The band structures and density of states (DOS) revealed the metallic nature of these phases. The chemical bonding analysis ensured the existing of covalent, ionic and metallic bonds in these compounds. The reflection spectra of all the compounds showed that these have the potential to be used as coating material to avoid solar heating up to ~8 eV. The large negative values of real part of the dielectric function revealed the metallic nature of all these compounds. The conductivity spectrum and the absorption coefficient are started from zero energy which also indicated the metallic features of all the compounds.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We would like to thank Department of Physics, Pabna University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh for the condensed matter lab support.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

We have no conflict of interest about this article.

Article References:

  1. Gorkov, L.P. and Rashba, E.I. (2001). Superconducting 2D system with lifted spin degeneracy: mixed singlet-triplet state. Physical Review Letters, 87(3), p.037004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.037004 
  2. Bauer, E., Hilscher, G., Michor, H., and Rogl, P. (2004). Heavy fermion superconductivity and magnetic order in noncentrosymmetric CePt3Si. Physical Review Letters, 92(2), p.027003.
  3. Seropegin, Y.D., Shapiev, B.I., and Bodak, O.I. (1999). Isothermal cross-section of the Ce-Ru-Si phase diagram at 600 C. J. of alloys and compounds, 288(1-2), pp.147-150.
  4. Kawai, T., Muranaka, H., and Flouquet, J. (2008). Magnetic and superconducting properties of CeTX3 (T: transition metal and X: Si and Ge) with non-centrosymmetric crystal structure. J. of the Physical Society of Japan, 77(6), pp.064716-064716.
  5. Smidman, M., Adroja, D.T., and Balakrishnan, G. (2015). Evidence for a hybridization gap in noncentrosymmetric CeRuSi3. Physical Review B, 91(6), p.064419. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.064419 
  6. Kumar, N., Dhar, S.K., and Manfrinetti, P. (2010). Magnetic properties of EuPtSi3 single crystals. Physical Review B, 81(14), p.144414.
  7. Kumar, N., Das, P.K., Kulkarni, R., and Bonville, P. (2011). Antiferromagnetic ordering in EuPtGe3. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 24(3), p.036005.
  8. Kaczorowski, D., Belan, B. and Gladyshevskii, R. (2012). Magnetic and electrical properties of EuPdGe3. Solid state communications, 152(10), pp.839-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2012.02.022 
  9. Goetsch, R.J., Anand, V.K. and Johnston, D.C. (2013). Anti ferromagnetism in EuNiGe3. Physical Review B, 87(6), p.064406.
  10. Bednarchuk, O., Gągor, A. and Kaczorowski, D. (2015). Synthesis, crystal structure and physical properties of EuTGe3 (T= Co, Ni, Rh, Pd, Ir, Pt) single crystals. J. of Alloys and Compounds, 622, pp.432-439.
  11. Maurya, A., Bonville, P., and Dhar, S.K. (2016). Magnetic properties and complex magnetic phase diagram in non-centrosymmetric EuRhGe3 and EuIrGe3 single crystals. J. of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 401, pp.823-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.10.134 
  12. Honda, F., Bonalde, I., and Ōnuki, Y. (2010). Pressure-induced superconductivity and large upper critical field in the noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnet CeIrGe3. Physical Review B, 81(14), p.140507.
  13. Mukuda, H., Fujii, T., Ohara, T., Harada, A., and Onuki, Y. (2008). Enhancement of superconducting transition temperature due to the strong antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations in the noncentrosymmetric heavy-Fermion superconductor CeIrSi3: A Si29 NMR study under pressure. Physical review letters, 100(10), p.107003.
  14. Tada, Y., Kawakami, N. and Fujimoto, S. (2010). Spin fluctuations and super conductivity in noncentrosymmetric heavy fermion systems CeRhSi3 and CeIrSi3. Physical Review B, 81(10), p.104506. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.104506 
  15. Szlawska, M. and Kaczorowski, D. (2011). Antiferromagnetic order and Kondo effect in single-crystalline Ce2IrSi3.Physical Review B, 84(9), p.094430.
  16. Settai, R., Sugitani, I., Okuda, Y., Thamizhavel, and Harima, H. (2007). Pressure-induced superconductivity in CeCoGe3 without inversion symmetry. J. of magnetism and magnetic materials, 310(2), pp.844-846.
  17. Smidman, M., Adroja, D.T., Chapon, L.C., and Krishnamurthy, V.V. (2013). Neutron scattering and muon spin relaxation measurements of the noncentrosymmetric antiferromagnet CeCoGe3. Physical Review B, 88(13), p.134416.
  18. Kimura, N., Ito, K., Saitoh, K., Umeda, Y., Aoki, H. and Terashima, T. (2005). Pressure-induced superconductivity in noncentro-symmetric heavy fermion CeRhSi3. Physical review letters, 95(24), p.247004. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.95.247004  
  19. Egetenmeyer, N., Gavilano, J.L., Maisuradze, A., Gerber, S., and Khasanov, R. (2012). Direct observation of the quantum critical point in heavy fermion CeRhSi3. Physical review letters, 108(17), p.177204.
  20. Dörrscheidt, W. and Schäfer, H. (1978). Die struktur des BaPtSn3, BaNiSn3 und SrNiSn3 und ihre verwandtschaft zum ThCr2Si2-strukturtyp. Journal of the Less Common Metals, 58(2), pp.209-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(78)90202-3 
  21. Kitagawa, J., Muro, Y., Takeda, N., ISHIKAWA, M., Yamamoto, H., Oguro, I. and Ishikawa, M. (1997). Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 66(7), pp.2163-2174.
  22. Anand, V.K., Hillier, A.D., Adroja, D.T., Strydom, A.M., and Rainford, B.D. (2011). Specific heat and μ SR study on the noncentrosymmetric superconductor LaRhSi3. Physical Review B, 83(6), p.064522.
  23. Smidman, M., Hillier, A.D., Adroja, D.T., Lees, M.R., and Balakrishnan, G. (2014). Investigations of the superconducting states of noncentrosymmetric LaPdSi3 and LaPtSi3. Physical Review B, 89(9), p.094509.
  24. Bauer, E., Khan, R.T., Michor, H., and Wolf, W. (2009). BaPtSi3: A noncentrosymmetric BCS like superconductor. Physical Review B, 80(6), p.064504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.064504  
  25. Eguchi, G., Peets, D.C., Kriener, M., Maeno, Y., and Sawa, H. (2011). Crystallographic and superconducting properties of the fully gapped noncentrosymmetric 5 d-electron super conductors CaMSi3 (M= Ir, Pt). Physical Review B, 83(2), p.024512.
  26. Eguchi, G., Wadati, H., and Maeno, Y. (2012). Large spin-orbit splitting and weakly anisotropic superconductivity revealed with single crystalline noncentrosymmetric CaIrSi3. Physical Review B, 86(18), p.184510.
  27. Miliyanchuk, K., Kneidinger, F., Michor, H. and Bauer, E. (2011). Platinum metal silicides and germanides: superconductivity in non-centrosymmetric intermetallics. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 273(1), p. 012078).
  28. Settai, R., Sugitani, I., Okuda, Y., and Harima, H. (2007). Pressure-induced superconductivity in CeCoGe3 without inversion symmetry. Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials, 310(2), pp.844-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.717 
  29. Kimura, N., Ito, K., Saitoh, K., Umeda, Y., Aoki, H. and Terashima, T. (2005). Pressure induced super conductivity in noncentro-symmetric heavy-fermion CeRhSi3. Physical review letters, 95(24), p.247004.
  30. Honda, F., Bonalde, I., Yoshiuchi, S., Hirose, Y., and Ōnuki, Y. (2010). Pressure-induced superconductivity in non-centrosymmetric compound CeIrGe3. Physica C: Super conductivity and its applications, 470, pp.S543-S544.
  31. Clark, S.J., Segall, M.D., Pickard, C.J., Hasnip, P.J., and Payne, M.C. (2005). First principles methods using CASTEP. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials, 220(5/6), pp.567-570.
  32. Materials Studio CASTEP manual_Accelrys, (2010). 261–262. http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/castep/documentation/WebHelp/CASTEP.html  
  33. Monkhorst, H.J. and Pack, J.D. (1976). Special points for Brillouin zone integrations. Physical review B, 13(12), p.5188.
  34. Pfrommer, B.G., Côté, M., Louie, S.G. and Cohen, M.L. (1997). Relaxation of crystals with the quasi-Newton method. Journal of Computational Physics, 131(1), pp.233-240.
  35. Kang, J., Lee, E.C. and Chang, K.J. (2003). First-principles study of the structural phase transformation of hafnia under pressure. Physical Review B, 68(5), p.054106.
  36. Fujii, H. and Sato, A. (2010). BaNiSn3-type ternary germanides SrMGe3 (M= Ir; Pd and Pt). J. of alloys and compounds, 508(2), pp.338-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.150 
  37. Kang, J., Lee, E.C. and Chang, K.J. (2003). First-principles study of the structural phase transformation of hafnia under pressure. Physical Review B, 68(5), p.054106.
  38. Ma, Y., Oganov, A.R. and Xie, Y. (2008). High-pressure structures of lithium, potassium, and rubidium predicted by an ab initio evolutionary algorithm. Physical Review B, 78(1), p.014102.
  39. Xiao, H.Y., Jiang, X.D., Duan, G., Gao, F., Zu, X.T. and Weber, W.J. (2010). First-principles calculations of pressure-induced phase transformation in AlN and GaN. Computational materials science, 48(4), pp.768-772.
  40. Uzunok, H.Y., Tütüncü, H.M., Srivastava, G.P., Ipsara, E. and Baṣoǧlu, A. (2017). The effect of spin orbit interaction on the physical properties of LaTSi3 (T= Ir, Pd, and Rh): First principles calculations. Journal of Applied Physics, 121(19), p.193904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983770 
  41. Hill, R. (1952). The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate. Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A, 65(5), p.349.
  42. ChaozhuShu, J.L. (2015). Shuangjie and Wenge Yang. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, 28(11), pp.3235-3241.
  43. Pugh, S.F. (1954). XCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 45(367), pp.823-843.
  44. Shein, I.R. (2011). Stability, structural, elastic, and electronic properties of polymorphs of the superconducting disilicide YIr2Si2. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 406(19), pp.3525-3530.
  45. Ranganathan, S.I. and Ostoja-Starzewski, M. (2008). Universal elastic anisotropy index. Physical Review Letters, 101(5), p.055504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.055504 
  46. Chen, X.Q., Niu, H., Li, D. and Li, Y. (2011). Modeling hardness of polycrystalline materials and bulk metallic glasses. Intermetallics, 19(9), pp.1275-1281.
  47. Rahaman, M.Z. and Rahman, M.A. (2016). Novel Laves phase superconductor NbBe2: A theoretical investigation. Computational Condensed Matter, 8, pp.7-13.
  48. Segall, M.D., Shah, R., Pickard, C.J. and Payne, M.C. (1996). Population analysis of plane-wave electronic structure calculations of bulk materials. Physical Review B, 54(23), p.16317.
  49. Yildirim, T. (2009). Strong coupling of the Fe-spin state and the As-As hybridization in iron-pnictide superconductors from first-principle calculations. Physical Review Letters, 102(3), p.037003. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.037003 
  50. Segall, M.D., Lindan, P.J., Probert, M.A., and Payne, M.C. (2002). First principles simulation: ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14(11), p.2717.
  51. Materials Studio CASTEP manual © Accelrys (2010). http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/castep/documentation/WebHelp/CASTEP.html.    
  52. Roknuzzaman, M., Hadi, M.A., Abden, M.J., Nasir, M.T., Islam, A.K.M.A., Ali, M.S., Ostrikov, K. and Naqib, S.H. (2016). Physical properties of predicted Ti2CdN versus existing Ti2CdC MAX phase: An ab initio study. Computational Materials Science, 113, pp.148-153.
  53. Li, S., Ahuja, R., Barsoum, M.W., Jena, P. and Johansson, B. (2008). Optical properties of Ti3SiC2 and Ti4AlN3. Applied Physics Letters, 92(22), p.221907.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2938862 
  54. Hossain, M.A., Ali, M.S. and Islam, A.K.M.A. (2012). Rare earth rhodium borides RRh3B (R= Y, Zr, and Nb): mechanical, thermal and optical properties. The European Physical Journal B, 85(12), p.396.
  55. Roknuzzaman, M. and Islam, A.K.M.A. (2012). Theoretical investigations of superconducting MAX phases Ti2InX (X= C, N). arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.4514.
  56. Saniz, R., Ye, L.H., Shishidou, T. and Freeman, A.J. (2006). Structural, electronic, and optical properties of NiAl3: first-principles calculations. Physical Review B, 74(1), p.014209.
  57. Fox, M. (2002). Optical properties of solids. ISBN 978-O-19850612-6 (paperback), 1-58.
  58. Russell, P. (2003). Photonic crystal fibers. Science, 299(5605), pp.358-362.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079280 

Article Info:

Academic Editor

Dr. Wiyanti Fransisca Simanullang Assistant Professor Department of Chemical Engineering Universitas Katolik Widya Mandala Surabaya East Java, Indonesia.

Received

March 11, 2020

Accepted

April 18, 2020

Published

April 27, 2020

Article DOI: 10.34104/ijmms.020.016028

Corresponding author

Md. Atikur Rahman*
Department of Physics, Pabna University of Science and Technology, Pabna-6600, Bangladesh.

Cite this article

Naefa MJ, and Rahman MA. (2020). First principles study of structural, elastic, electronic, and optical features of the non-centrosymmetric superconductors SrMGe3 (Where M= Ir, Pt, and Pd), Int. J. Mat. Math. Sci., 2(2), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.34104/ijmms.020.016028 

Views
301
Download
1371
Citations
Badge Img
Share