univerge site banner
Original Article | Open Access | Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., 6(1), 30-43 | doi: 10.34104/ejmhs.024.030043

Status of the Psychological Resilience among Selected University Students

Fawaz Mohammed Ahmed Al-Shehari* Mail Img Orcid Img ,
G M Jakaria Mail Img Orcid Img ,
Biddut Chandra Sarker Mail Img Orcid Img ,
Afsana Papri Mail Img Orcid Img ,
Aklema Akter Mail Img ,
Md. Khokon Hossain Mail Img ,
Aparna A. Ashtaputre Mail Img Orcid Img

Abstract

The present study aims to assess the level of psychological resilience among university students, taking into account variables such as gender, specialization, and study level. The significance of this study lies in the unique nature of the target sample, which comprises students from various disciplines and represents a crucial segment and the future foundation of society. To conduct the study, a stratified random sample was selected from three specified universities, with a sampling percentage of 0.05. The study sample consisted of 1060 male and female students. The researcher utilized a self-designed psychological resilience scale to collect data. The obtained data was then analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, employing statistical techniques such as the Pearson correlation coefficient, Alpha-Cronbach coefficient, one-sample t-test, two-independent samples t-test, and one-way analysis of variance. The results indicated a high level of psychological resilience among university students, as reflected in the total score of the resilience scale. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were observed between male and female students regarding their average resilience scores, with males showing higher levels of psychological resilience. However, no significant differences were found between genders in terms of self-efficacy and optimism dimensions on the psychological resilience scale. Moreover, the study revealed no statistically significant differences in the level of psychological resilience among students from different specializations or study levels. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the psychological well-being of this important segment of society, which can inform the development of targeted interventions and support systems to enhance the resilience and overall mental health of university students. 

Review of Literature

The study by Ismaeel (2017) aimed to identify the level of psychological resilience and the level of mindfulness, as well as identify the relation between psychological resilience and mindfulness of college education students, in addition to identifying the predictability of mindfulness through psychological resilience. The sample of (223) male and female students enrolled in the third year of college education, with an age range of 21-23. Results showed the following: low levels of psychological resilience among the study sample. There are above-average levels of mindfulness among the study sample. There is a positive statistically significant correlation at 0.01 levels between psychological resilience and mindfulness; mindfulness also contributed to the predictability of psychological resilience among the study sample. The study by Shaqoura, (2012) aimed to know the level of psychological resilience and satisfaction with life among Palestinian university students and whether there is a relationship between psychological resilience and satisfaction with life among Palestinian university students. The study sample consisted of (600) male and female students. The researcher used the analytical descriptive method. To achieve the objectives of the study, the researcher prepared a measure of "psychological resilience" and another measure of "satisfaction with life." The results of the study found that there is a high level of psychological resistance and satisfaction with life in the students, the existence of a positive correlation between psychological resilience and satisfaction with life, there are differences in statistical evidence of psychological resilience depending on the gender variable in favor of males.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the current study, the researcher used the descriptive approach, which means what exists in reality and tries to explain it. The Tool of the Study Psychological Resilience Scale The researcher built a tool to measure the psychological resilience of the sample members by following the following steps:

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The level of psychological resilience among univer-sities students in relation to the total score on the scale is high. The results indicated that there were statis-tically significant differences between the average scores of males and the average scores of females in the level of psychological resilience in favor of males, and There were no statistically significant differences between the average scores of males and those of females in the dimensions of the self-efficacy, opti-mism on the psychological resilience scale. The results indicated no statistically significant differences in the level of psychological resilience among university students of scientific and humanitarian specializations. The results indicated no statistically significant differences in the level of psychological resilience among students of the level of study (first, second, third, fourth) on the psychological resilience scale and its dimensions for university students.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors express a profound sense of gratitude and respect to all those who helped them out, in one way or another, to finish the research article. Special thanks are extended to the research respondents in the Uni-versities.a

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No conflicts of interest are related to this work.

Article References:

  1. American Psychological Association (APA), (2002). The Road to Resilience, NE, Washington, DC, 1-7.
  2. Abbas, M. O. (2010). Psychological resilience and life satisfaction. Amman: Al-Yazuri Publishing House.
  3. Abu Halawa M. A. (2013). The State of Flow: Concept, Dimensions, and Measurement. Publications of the Arab Psychological Science Network, pp. 29.
  4. Al-Assar, S. (2010). Resilience from the perspective of positive psychology. Egyptian Association for Psychological Studies, Cairo, Egypt, 77, 11-16.
  5. Al-Buhairi, M. R. (2010). The variation of psychological resilience in some variables among a sample of orphans with slow learning. The Egy. J. of Psy. Stu., 21(70), 480-535.
  6. Al-Nimr, A. Z. (2016). Self-acceptance and its relationship to acceptance of the other and methods of attachment among university students. J. of Educat. Sci., 2(2), 1-65.
  7. Attia, A. A. M. (2011). Academic Resilience and its Relationship to Self-Esteem among a Sample of Open Education Students. Psychological Studies, 21(4), 571-621.
  8. Donaldson, S., and Ko, I. (2010). Positive Organizational Psychology, Behavior and Scholarship. A review of the emerging literature and evidence base. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(3), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439761003790930 
  9. Ercan, H. (2017). The relationship between resilience and the big five personality traits in emerging adulthood. Eurasian J. of Educational Research, 70, 83-103. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.70.5 
  10. Goldstien, S., and Brooks, R. (2004). The power of resilience: Achieving balance confidence and personal strength in your life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  11. Graber, R., et al. (2015). Psychological resilience state of knowledge and future research agendas. Working papers 425, Rebecca Gra-ber, School of Applied Social Science, University of Brighton, UK Florence Pichon, Overseas Development Institute, Climate and Environment Programme, Elizabeth Carabine, Blackfriars Road 203, London, 1-27.
  12. Hadiloo N. (2023). Enhancing psychological development in children with disabilities: the power of environment and family, Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., 5(5), 108-117. https://doi.org/10.34104/ejmhs.023.01080117
  13. Ismaeel, H. K. S. (2017). Psychological resilience of college of education students and their relation to their mindfulness: (a predictive study). J. of Psychological Counseling, Ain Shams University, Egypt, 50(1), 288-335.
  14. Richardson, G. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10020 
  15. Shaqoura, Y. O. S. (2012). Psychological resilience and its relationship to life satisfaction among Palestinian university students in Gaza Governorate. Unpublished MA thesis, College of Education, Al-Azhar University, Gaza, Palestine.
  16. Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 194-200.
  17. Uddin ME, Sultana S, Lima A, Imran MAS, and Mahmud S. (2022). Non-biotech students perception of biotechnology and its applications in a university theology faculty students: a brief survey study. Int. J. Agric. Vet. Sci., 4(6), 116-129. https://doi.org/10.34104/ijavs.022.01160129
  18. Wald, J., et al. (2006). Literature review of concepts final report. Psychological resilience. Toronto: DRDC.

Article Info:

Academic Editor

Dr. Etienne Steve Ahanda Etong,  Health Project Coordinator, Epidemiology and Public Health Division, ICAP at Columbia University, New York, USA.

Received

February 2, 2024

Accepted

February 21, 2024

Published

February 28, 2024

Article DOI: 10.34104/ejmhs.024.030043

Coresponding author

Fawaz Mohammed Ahmed Al-Shehari*
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational and Psychological Sciences, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen.

Cite this article

Citation: Al-Shehari FMA, Jakaria GM, Sarker BC, Papri A, Akter A, and Hossain MK, and Ashtaputre AA. (2024). Status of the psychological resilience among selected university students, Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., 6(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.34104/ejmhs.024.030043 

Views
129
Download
85
Citations
Badge Img
Share