univerge site banner
Original Article | Open Access | Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., 4(4), 100-110 | doi: 10.34104/ejmhs.022.01000110

Assessment of Biochemical Markers in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Patients in the Niger Delta Region, Nigeria

Ezeiruaku Ferdin Chukwuma ,
Onitsha Enebrayi Nelson* Mail Img

Abstract

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome is a chronic endocrine disorder with clinical manifestations of oligomenorrhoea, amenorrhea, hirsuitism, ovarian dysfunction, and multiple ovarian cysts, affecting many women of reproductive age. PCOS is the primary cause of ovulatory infertility worldwide. This study assessed the concentration of reproductive hormones in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients attending tertiary hospitals in the Niger Delta Region, Nigeria. Three hundred and fifty infertile premenopausal women aged 20 to 40 years were recruited; comprising 250 women presenting complete Rotterdam patients of polycystic ovarian syndrome diagnostic criteria, and 100 apparently healthy women who serve as the control. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for reproductive hormone levels using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent Assay. The result showed significantly increased concentration of estradiol, luteinizing hormone, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone, and prolactin levels in the PCOS patients when compared with the control subjects. Progesterone and Follicle-stimulating hormone levels were significantly lower in the patients with PCOS than in normal subjects. However, there was no significant difference was observed in the serum dehydroepiandrosterone levels. Furthermore, the study revealed that insulin resistance level was significantly (p=0.000) higher in the PCOS patients than in the control subjects. The BMI was significantly higher in PCOS patients than in the control group. The study result showed a positive correlation between BMI and insulin resistance, and a negative correlation with FSH. The result showed a significant positive correlation between estrogen and insulin resistance, Luteinizing hormone, and a negative correlation with LH/FSH ratio. The study affirms that there is an interrelationship between hormones thus, promoting hormonal disorders in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients. 

INTRODUCTION

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogene-ous endocrine disorder affecting 20-25% of women of child bearing age (National Institute of Health, 2012).It is defined by the presence of at least two of the Rotter-dam criteria: oligo-anovulation, clinical or biological hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovary (Tarlatzis et al., 2010). PCOS is a complex disease characterized with a range of clinical manifestations such as mens-trual dysfunction (oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea); hyperandrogenism, infertility, hirsutism, acne, obesity, metabolic syndrome, ovarian dysfunction, and multiple ovarian cysts (Rosenfield and Ehrmann, 2016). It is estimated that nearly one out of every four women has polycystic ovaries (PCO) with a quarter of these wo-men developing symptoms of PCOS (Idrisa, 2005; Kovacs, 2004). PCOS prevalence varies globally and its dependent on several factors such as ethnicity, race, environment and the criteria used for the diagno-sis of PCOS (Fraser and Kovacs, 2004). According to reports by March et al. (2010) and Azziz et al. (2004), the prevalence of 2.2%–26% was recorded worldwide among women of child bearing age using the Rotter-dam criterion. In Nigeria, two studies by Ugwu et al. (2013) and Omokanye et al. (2015 10) reported the prevalence of PCOS as 18.1% and 12.2% respect-ively. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is classified by a pattern of hormonal imbalances and metabolic dysregulation, including compensatory hyperinsulin-emia, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, all of which contribute to the pathogenesis (Diamanti-Kandarakis and Dunaif, 2012).Women of child bearing age with polycystic ovary syndrome and central obesity are predisposed to long-term health ailments, including an ovulation, type 2 diabetes, hyperinsulinemia, endo-metrial cancer and hypertension (Al-Bayyari, 2018). 

The etiology of PCOS is complex and certain factors such as genetic, environmental and lifestyle factors may contributes to its development, but the exact un-derlying defect remains unknown. However, it is commonly linked to insulin resistance resulting to hyperandrogenism, dyslipidemia and other metabolic disturbances (Lee et al., 2010 13; Karabulut et al., 2012). Hyperandrogenism alters ovarian steroidogene-sis and folliculogenesis, resulting to anovulation (Lee et al., 2010). Other possible etiological factors of PCOS include; disorders of the hypothalamic-pitui-tary-ovarian axis (HPO) and patient`s genetic pred-isposition, which varies geographically (Chen et al., 2008; Sharif et al., 2019; Igwegbe et al., 2013).

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is diagnosed by clinical or laboratory investigations revealing the exist-ence of irregular menstrual cycles, oligo/anovulation, elevated total and free testosterone levels (hyper-androgenaemia), and the presence of polycystic ova-ries on transvaginal scan as recognized at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) consensus meeting in Rotterdam2003 recor-ded by ESHRE/ASRM, 2004. The diagnosis was based on the above criteria fulfilling sufficient specificity and sensitivity to define the ovarian morphology in PCOS as the presence of twelve (12) or more follicles mea-suring 2 to 9 mm in diameter and increased of ovarian volume (>10cm3) (Balen et al., 2003). The USA National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Androgen Excess Society (AES) are two other criteria used for the diagnosis of PCOS, accounting for the different prevalence assessments of PCOS in the past (Vadu-neme and Chidi, 2019).Over the years, the diagnosis has been contentious; however, the Rotterdam criteria require that at least two (2) of the three (3) above cha-racteristics for a widely accepted diagnosis of PCOS are maintained and patient-specific phenotypes are identified for each patients with PCOS, as this has implications for early and late PCOS complications (Akpata et al., 2018; Palomba et al., 2015).

PCOS is a clinical syndrome characterized by a range of endocrine, reproductive, and metabolic abnormal-ities that can be severe in some patients but only cause minor symptoms in others. In different patients, the major clinical symptoms of hyperandrogenism and an ovulatory cycle, termed as the typical phenotype in PCOS, occur in varied rates (Setji and Brown, 2007, Pembe et al., 2009; Palomba et al., 2015). Biochem-ically, hyperandrogenism is defined as an increase in male steroid hormones such as testosterone and andro-stenedione (DHEAS) (Chen et al., 2006). It is present-ed as free androgen index, which is calculated from low serum levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) in PCOS women. The alteration in reproduce-tion system presents as oligomenorrhea, amenorrhea, or dysfunctional uterine bleeding which is connected with an ovulation and resultant infertility (Maharaja and Amod, 2009; Yan-min et al., 2010). 

The Serum/plasma levels of reproductive hormones of the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Ovarian (HPO) axis may be disturbed in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. This disruption is responsible for two other endocrine manifestations of PCOS such as elevated serum LH leading to an increased LH/FSH ratio in some patients (Vaduneme and Chidi, 2019). The stu-dies of Obuna et al. (2012) and Baqai et al. (2010) found that PCOS can influence the response to ovula-tion inducers (drugs) and may also lead to early mis-carryage in infertile women. However, the presence of polycystic ovaries (PCO) has not been shown to have a substantial impact on fertility in women. This study is designed to assess some biochemical markers of poly-cystic ovary syndrome patients attending different Health Facilities in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Area 

This research was carried out in two (2) States (Baye-lsa and Rivers States) in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. The samples for the study were collected from women that attended the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in some Tertiary Health Institutions in the region: University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hos-pital (UPTH) Port Harcourt, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital (NDUTH) Okolobiri, Federal Medi-cal Centre (FMC) Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, and other tertiary health centres in the Niger Delta Region.

Study Population 

This is a cross-sectional study carried out on three hundred and fifty (350) patients aged 20 to 40 years, comprising of two hundred and fifty (250) women presenting complete Rotterdam patients of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) diagnostic criteria (oligo-/amenorrhea; clinical and/or biochemical signs of HA; polycystic ovaries detected by ultrasound); and one hundred (100) apparently healthy women (with normal menstruating cycles) that served as control. The study was conducted for a period of two (2) years from November, 2019 and September, 2021. 

Sampling and Sample Selection

A non-probability purposive sampling was used. Inclusion Criteria include; Patients presenting with menstrual abnormalities, subfertility, hirsuitism and obesity (BMI>25kg/m2) acanthosis nigricans and acne; ovarian volume more than 7.5cm3 on ultrasonography and Age 20-40 years. Additional inclusion criteria were: women without other known endocrine dis-orders; absence of drug administration over 3 months preceding the study, (including oral combined contra-ceptives); and informed consent of the patient. 

The exclusion criteria were: patients receiving treat-ment for polycystic ovarian disease; mental illnesses; inherited syndromes and congenital malformations; hyperprolactinemia; congenital dysfunction of the adrenal cortex; thyroid disorders; Cushing syndrome and disease; tumors of the pelvic organs.

Data Collection Procedure 

A total of two hundred and fifty (250) cases of poly-cystic ovarian syndrome as diagnosed on ultrasound were selected from outpatient department (OPD) of various selected tertiary health institutions. An infor-med consent was collected from PCOS patients inclu-ded in the study. History of patient was taken at pre-sentation regarding name, age, address, marital status, symptoms (menstrual disturbances, sub fertility, obe-sity and excessive hair growth), severity, duration and any previous treatment was obtained. These cases were examined for height, weight, body mass index ((BMI >25kg/m2), hirsutism, acne, acnthosis nigricans, breast examination (galactorrhoea). 

Sample Collection and Preparation

About 5.0ml of a single non-fasting venous blood was collected from the antecubital region from the sub-jects via venipuncture between 8:00AM and 11:00 AM, to control for diurnal variations and dispensed into plain containers. The blood sample was allowed to clot properly and centrifuged at 1500rpm for 5minutes using bench centrifuge, and serum separated and stored frozen at −20˚C until the time of assay. The blood samples were investigated for LH, FSH, estrogen, progesterone testosterone, DHEAS, Insulin resistance and prolactin levels within seven (7) days of sample collection.

Ethical Clearance 

The essence and details of the study was explained to the subjects (both test and control group) and consent gotten before sample collection. Institutional ethical approval was gotten before the sample collection was performed from the institution research ethical com-mittee.

Analytical Methods 

The measurement of Height and body weight was done using standard procedures with a stadiometer and scales, respectively. BMI was calculated using the formula BMI = Body weight (kg)/height (m2). The serum progesterone, estrogen, follicle stimulating hor-mone, luteinizing hormone and Prolactin assays were analyzed using AB Diagnostics, Abia hormone ELISA kits from Halomedicals, Germany (Amballi et al., 2003). The principle is based on the solid phase en-zyme linked Immunosorbent assay. The components of the ELISA kit were specifically designed to analyze estradiol, progesterone, estrogen, testosterone, DHE-AS, FSH, LH and prolactin. Insulin resistance was assayed using homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) method and calculated using the formula (HOMA-IR) = FPI X FPG/22.5 (Bakari and Onyemelukwe, 2009).

Data Analysis Procedure

The results of this investigation were input into the SPSS package, version 23, and displayed as mean and standard deviation. The difference in mean values was tested using the students t-test. The 95 percent con-fidence level (P<0.05) was used and considered significant. 

RESULTS

Results from Table 1 in the current study revealed significantly (p=0.000) higher values for body weight (68.39 ± 2.59 vs 70.18 ± 1.87) and BMI (22.17 ± 0.75 vs 27.81 ± 0.87) in the Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome patients compared with the control group. Also, no significant differences was observed in age (34.89 ± 4.90 vs 35.80 ± 5.40) and in height (1.61 ± 0.02 vs 1.62 ± 0.25) of women with PCOS compared with the control group. Results from Table 2 shows that the mean serum concentration of estradiol (E2) in the PCOS patients is significantly (p=0.014) higher than the controls (29.26± 3.52 vs 48.22 ± 14.44). The mean serum concentration of progesterone (3.94 ± 2.11 vs 2.63 ± 1.30; (p=0.010) and Follicle Stimulating Hor-mone (FSH) (11.10 ± 5.27 vs 8.01± 3.34 p=0.017) in the patients with PCOS was significantly lower than the control group. Serum level of Luteinizing Hormone (LH) in the patients with PCOS was significantly higher when compared with the control group (10.79 ± 23.49 vs 19.25 ± 7.08; p=0.029). The mean value of LH/FSH ratio (1.31 ± 0.39 vs 2.00 ± 1.08) and test-osterone (0.88 ± 0.17 vs 1.15 ± 0.39) was significantly higher (p=0.000 and p=0.005 respectively) in the PCOS patients compared to the control. Serum dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEAS) showed no signify-cant difference (p=0.298) in the subjects. The mean serum level of prolactin was significantly (p=0.000) higher in the PCOS patients compared with the control group (12.81± 4.47 vs 23.95 ± 8.32). Results from Table 3 shows that the mean values of Insulin Resis-tance was significantly (p=0.000) higher in the PCOS patients compared to the control group (1.50± 0.51 versus 2.96 ± 1.39). Results from Table 4 shows a significant positive correlation between Body Mass Index (BMI) and insulin resistance (IR) with a co-rrelation coefficient of r=0.386 (P=0.015). BMI show-ed a non-significant positive correlation with estrogen, progesterone, Luteinizing Hormone, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone and prolactin. 

However, there was a non-significant negative cor-relation between BMI and FSH levels with a correla-tion coefficient of r=0.562 (P=0.731). Data from Table 5 revealed that there was significant positive cor-relation between estrogen and insulin resistance (IR) and Luteinizing hormone (LH). Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), testosterone, dihydroepiandrosterone (DHEAS) and prolactin (PRL) showed a non-signi-ficant positive correlation with estrogen levels. How-ever, the study shows a negative correlation between estrogen and LH/FSH ration in the polycystic ovarian syndrome patients (Allagoa et al., 2021).

Table 1: Comparison of the Anthropometric Characteristics of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) women and Control  Subjects.

Key *= represent P < 0.05 was statistically significant; NS=Not statistically significant (P>0.05); Values are the mean ± SD. Abbreviations: kg/m2 = kilogram per meter squared; BMI= body mass index; Kg= Kilometer; Yrs= Years. Student t-test was used.

Table 2: Comparison of Reproductive Hormone levels of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and Controls.

Key: E2 (Estradiol); PROG (Progesterone); FSH (Follicle stimulating hormone); LH (Luteinizing Hormone); LH/FSH (LH/FSH ratio); TESTOS (Testosterone); DHEAS (dehydroepiandrosterone); PRL (Prolactin). * represent p<0.05 is statistically significant; p>0.05=Not statistically significant.

Table 3: Comparison of Insulin Resistance in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Patients and Control.

Key: *= represent significant; Values are the mean ± SD.

Table 4: Correlation analysis between Body Mass Index and Insulin Resistance, Female Reproductive Hormones among Patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.

Key: BMI (Body Mass Index); IR (Insulin Resistance); E2 (Estradiol); PROG (Progesterone); FSH (Follicle stimulating hormone); LH (Luteinizing Hormone); LH/FSH (LH/FSH ratio); TESTOS (Testosterone); DHEAS (dehydroepiandro-sterone); PRL (Prolactin). * represent p<0.05 is statistically significant; p>0.05=Not statistically significant.

Table 5: Correlation coefficients between Estrogen (E2) and other female Reproductive Hormones and Insulin Resistance among Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.

Key: BMI (Body Mass Index); IR (Insulin Resistance); E2 (Estradiol); PROG (Progesterone); Follicle stimulating hormone; Luteinizing Hormone; LH/FSH (LH/FSH ratio); TESTOS (Testosterone); DHEAS (dehydroepiandrosterone); PRL (Pro-lactin). * represent p<0.05 is statistically significant; p>0.05=Not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (POS) is the most frequent heterogeneous endocrine disorder in premenopausal women and the leading cause of an ovulatory infertility in women of childbearing age (Vaduneme and Chidi, 2019). It is usually manifested with oligomenorrhoea, amenorrhoea, hirsuitism, acne, obesity, metabolic syn-drome, ovarian dysfunction, & multiple ovarian cysts. This study evaluated the levels of reproductive hor-mones and insulin resistance in women with Poly-cystic Ovarian Syndrome in the Niger Delta Region, Nigeria. Results from current study revealed no signi-ficant differences (p>0.05) observed in the age and height of women with PCOS compared with the con-trol (Table 1). This concurs with the previous studies by Chukwunonso et al. (2018) and Oyebanji et al. (2018), which reported a non-significant difference in the age and height of PCOS subjects compared with normal subjects. Overweight or obesity is diagnosed in approximately 60–80 percent of women having Poly-cystic Ovarian Syndrome (Moran et al., 2012). A high BMI raises the chance of reproductive problems. Obe-sity reduces reproductive capacity due to physiological changes in the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Ovarian (HPO) axis, resulting in menstruation and ovulation abnormal ities, as well as infertility (Suturina et al., 2017; Kaur et al., 2018). In the present study, the weight and BMI of the women having PCOS was significantly (p=0. 000) higher than the control as shown in (Table 1). This is consistent with the findings of Mariya et al. (2020), which documented that many women suffering from PCOS were over-weight or obese. Estradiol (E2) is the most biologically active form of estrogen. It is a major female sex steroid hormone that is thought to play a vital role in the regulation of menstrual female reproductive cycles. In our findings, the serum concen-tration of estradiol (E2) is significantly (p=0.014) higher in the women having PCOS than the control group (Table 2). This finding is in consonance with the works of Oyebanji et al. (2018) and Khmil et al. (2020), which reported an elevated serum estradiol levels in PCOS patients compared with control, and contradicts the work by Hashemi et al. (2016) who reported an increased Estradiol (E2) levels in PCOS women. This elevation in Estradiol (E2) levels could be attributed to reduced sex hormone-related globulin levels (Dumitrescu et al., 2015). Progesterone is an endogenous steroid sex hormone involved in variety of female reproductive physiology such as pregnancy, menstrual cycle, and embryogenesis (De-Groot et al., 2015). Results from this study revealed that serum progesterone level was significantly (p=0.010) reduced in the PCOS patients as compared to the control sub-jects. This finding corresponds with Vaduneme and Chidi, (2019) and Hussein and Alalaf, (2013), which reported low progesterone levels in women suffering Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. The reduction in pro-gesterone level could be associated to hyperinsulin-emia and/or insulin resistance which is reported as a possible cause of the progesterone deficiency in PCOS. Reduced progesterone level may results to failure of the ovaries to release eggs, resulting to anovulation. 

Irregularities of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Ovarian (HPO) Axis has been implicated in PCOS, and disrupt-tion in the pulsatility of gonadotrophin releasing hor-mone (GnRH) results in the relative rise in LH to FSH release (Alnakash et al., 2007). LH and FSH are glyco-lproteinhormones produced by the anterior pituitary in response to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) from the hypothalamus (Stamatiades and Kaiser, 2018). They are primarily involved in sexual develop-ment and reproductive process in both male and female body system (Barbieri, 2014). The serum level of luteinizing hormone (LH) was significantly (p=0.029) greater in PCOS patients, whereas FSH was signifi-cantly (p=0.017) lower in PCOS patients compared to the control group in the current study (Table 2). Decreased FSH level may causes follicular atresia of the ovaries resulting to an abrupt development of ano-vulation (Sampurna et al., 2017). High LH levels cause the theca cells of the ovaries to produce more and-rogens. Therefore, high LH levels and low FSH levels can lead to loss of menstrual cycles, infertility, decre-ased sex drive, vaginal dryness, and osteoporosis, which can lead to a tendency to develop fractures and thus, PCOS (Nas et al., 2020; Oyebaiji et al., 2018).

LH and FSH are the anterior pituitary hormones that control ovarian physiology in female reproductive system. In normal physiological system, the serum concentration of FSH is higher than LH. However, in PCOS, the serum concentration of LH is higher than FSH causing overproduction of ovarian androgen and ovulatory dysfunction (Clamn et al., 2002). Results in this study showed that the serum level of LH/FSH ratio was significantly (p=0.000) elevated in the PCOS subjects compared with the control subjects (Table 2). This is similar to the previous study of Yue and colleagues, (2017) which reported an increased LH level and LH/FSH ratio in women suffering from PCOS when compared with control subjects. This increase in LH/FSH ratio could be related to the patho-logical secretion of gonadotropin (gonadotropin-releas-ing hormone) which upregulates the transcription of the LH β-subunit through the FSH β-subunit, which results to a higher LH/FSH ratio in PCOS patients. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) is a pre-hormone produced by the adrenal cortex and converted into DHEA. In the present study, the level of DHEAS was higher in PCOS patients than in controls, however, no significant difference (p = 0.298) was observed (p = 0.298) (Table 2). This concurs with the works of Khan et al (2021) who documented a significantly elevated DHEAS levels in the PCOS patients. Hyperandro-genemia, or high serum testosterone levels, has been linked to menstrual cycle irregularities and negative metabolic conditions in premenopausal women, inclu-ding insulin resistance, central obesity, dyslipidemia, and chronic inflammation, all of which may predispose them to other metabolic disorders (Marilyn and Richardson, 2003). Our findings revealed a significant (p=0.005) elevation of serum testosterone levels in PCOS patients compared with controls as shown in (Table 2). This result is in consonance with previous works by Mariya et al. (2020); Khan et al. (2021) and Oyebanji et al. (2018), which documented that women with PCOS demonstrated a significant elevation in serum total Testosterone levels. Prolactin is a hormone secreted from anterior pituitary gland whose primary function is the production of milk (lactation) in re-productive females (Muhjah, 2020). Abnormally high serum androgen level has been demonstrated in PCOS patients which results in ovulatory failure and increa-sed infertility (Al-Hindawi, 2018). Apostolos, (2018) reported an increased serum prolactin level in PCOS patients. This study revealed a significantly (p=0.000) higher prolactin level PCOS patients when compared with the control subjects (Table 2).

However, it contradicts the works of Vaduneme and Chidi, (2019) and Hussein and Alalaf, (2013). Hyper-prolactinemia may influence fertility in women by inhibiting GnRH secretion by its inhibitory action on GnRH neurons, or by affecting the pituitary gland and decreasing gonadotropin production, resulting in ovu-latory failure (Ursula, 2012).

Insulin resistance is a state in which a given concent-ration of insulin produces an attenuated biological response (Cefalu, 2001). High levels of insulin may be a factor in the inflammation and other metabolic com-plications associated with PCOS. Although insulin resistance is not part of the diagnostic criteria for PCOS, its importance in the pathogenesis of PCOS cannot be determined. PCOS is connected to insulin resistance independent of total or fat free body mass. Data from the present study shows that the mean value of Insulin Resistance was significantly (p=0.000) higher in the PCOS patients (Table 3).This elevation in insulin resistance could be attributed to abnorma-lities in pituitary gonadotropin secretion, excessive stimulation of IGF-I receptors, excessive activity of 17α-hydroxylase, an enzyme that regulates conversion of 17-hydroxy-progesterone into androstenedione, as well as diminished synthesis of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGF-BP1). Results from Table 4 showed a significant positive correlation bet-ween Body BMI and insulin resistance with a cor-relation coefficient of r=0.386 (P=0.015). BMI showed non-significant positive correlation with estrogen, progesterone, LH, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone, dehy-droepiandrosterone and prolactin. However, BMI and FSH shows a non-significant negative correlation bet-ween with a correlation coefficient of r=0.562 (P=0. 731). Our finding is consistent with the work of Jaya-shree and colleagues, (2019) which documented that insulin resistance showed a significant positive cor-relation with BMI. It also concurred with Zaheera, (2020) which reported that BMI did not significantly correlate with LH, FSH, or prolactin (P>0.05). Our finding also confirmed the work by Kiddy et al. (1990) who a negative correlation between BMI and FSH levels in PCOS. Furthermore, a significantly positive correlation was observed between estrogen and insulin resistance and LH. While, a negative correlation was observed between estrogen and LH/FSH ration in women with PCOS.

CONCLUSION

This study showed higher levels of estradiol (E2), LH, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone, hydroepiandrosterone and prolactin levels in PCOS patients. Furthermore, it revealed that the level of progesterone and FSH was lower in the patients with PCOS than normal subjects. This study has showed that estradiol (E2), LH, FSH, LH/FSH ratio, testosterone, prolactin, & progesterone were implicated in PCOS patients. The study also revealed that insulin resistance level was higher in the women than the control subjects. Insulin resistance had a strong positive correlation with BMI, but FSH had a substantial negative correlation. The result also showed significant positive correlation between estrogen and insulin resistance, Luteinizing hormone, and a negative correlation with LH/FSH ratio.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We sincerely thank the management and staff of University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH) Port Harcourt, Niger Delta University Teaching Hospital (NDUTH) Okolobiri, and Federal Medical Centre (FMC) Yenagoa, Bayelsa State for creating an enabling environment in the course of this work. We also appreciate all the staff of De-Integrated Medical Laboratory Port-Harcourt, Rivers State.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There is no conflict of interest regarding to the publi-cation of this article.

Article References:

  1. Akpata, C. B., Uadia, P. O., and Okonofua, F. E. (2018). Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in nigerian women with infertility: A prospective study of the three assessment criteria. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8(12), 1109-1120.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2018.812112  
  2. Al-Bayyari N. (2018). Role of vitamin D in the etiology of polycystic ovary syndrome, a review. CPQ Nutrition, 1, 1–12. 
  3. Al-Hindawi, Z.M. (2018). Prevalence and ultra-sound features of polycystic ovaries in Kerbala-Iraq. Iraq Medical Journal, 2(4), 3-7.
  4. Allagoa DO, Oriji PC, Briggs DC, Ikoro C, Unachukwu CE, Ubom AE, Atemie G, and Eneni B. (2021). Rhesus negative pregnancy: prevalence and foetomaternal outcomes in a tertiary hospital, South-South Nigeria. Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., 3(5), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.34104/ejmhs.021.012300131   
  5. Alnakash, A. H., and Al-Tae, N. K. (2007). Polycystic ovarian syndrome: the correlation between the LH/FSH ratio and disease mani-festations. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 12(1), 35.
  6. Apostolos, T. (2018). Polycystic ovary synd-rome and early pregnancy loss: A review article. EC Gynecology, 7(2), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.37557/gjphm.v1i2.21 
  7. Azziz, R., Woods, K.S., Reyna, R. (2004). The Prevalence and Features of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in an Unselected Population. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabol-ism, 89, 2745-2749. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-032046 
  8. Bakari, A. G., and Onyemelukwe, G. C. (2009). Insulin resistance and blood pressure in Nigerian type 2 diabetic patients. International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, 1(4), 132-134. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJMMS.9000139 
  9. Balen, A. H., Laven, J. S., Tan, S. L. (2003). Ultrasound assessment of the polycystic ovary: international consensus definitions. Human reproducetion update, 9(6), 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmg044 
  10. Baqai, Z., Khanam, M., and Parren, S. (2010). Prevalence of PCOS in infertile patients. Medi-cal Channel, 16(3), 437- 440.
  11. Barbien L.R. (2014). Endocrine of menstrual cycle. Methods of Molecule Biology, 1154, 145-169.
  12. Cefalu, W. T. (2001). Insulin resistance: cellular and clinical concepts. Experimental biology and medicine, 226(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/153537020122600103 
  13. Chen, X., Yang, D., Mo, Y. (2008). Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected women from southern China. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 139(1), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.12.018 
  14. Chen, M. J., Yang, W. S., Yang, J. H.  (2006). Low sex hormone-binding globulin is associated with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and metabolic syndrome in women with PCOS. Human Reproduction, 21(9), 2266-2271. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del175  
  15. Chukwunonso A. D. (2018). Oxidative stress markers and lipid profiles of patients with poly-cystic ovary syndrome in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Obstetrics and Gynecology Science, 62(5), 335-343.
  16. Clamn, P., Graves, G.R., Kredentser, J.V. (2002). Hirsuitism: Evaluation and treatment. Sogo clin pract guidelines; 110, 1-6.
  17. De Groot, L. J., & Jameson, J. L. (2013). Endo-crinology adult and pediatric: the thyroid gland. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2179.
  18. Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., and Dunaif, A. (2012). Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary synd-rome revisited: an update on mechanisms and implications. J. of Endocrine Review, 33, 981–1030. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2011-1034  
  19. Dumitrescu, R., Mehedintu, C., Briceag, I.  (2015). The polycystic ovary syndrome: an u-pdate on metabolic and hormonal mechanisms. Journal of medicine and life, 8(2), 142. PMCID: PMC4392092.
  20. Fraser, I. S., and Kovacs, G. T. (2004). Current recommenddation for the diagnostic evaluation and follow-up of patient presenting with symptomatic polycystic ovary syndrome. Best pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 18(5), 813-823.
  21. Hashemi, A. H., Mozdarani, H., and Naghavi, A. (2016). Comparison of the levels of LH and FSH, TSH, prolactin, progesterone and estradiol hormones between Iranian infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome and healthy women. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 5(12), 370-375.
  22. Hassan, M. F. (2020). The Frequency of Elev-ated Prolactin Level in Polycystic Ovary Synd-rome Women (Pcos) and Itseffect on Pregnancy Rate. Global J. of Public Health Medicine, 2(1), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.37557/gjphm.v2i1.28  
  23. Hussein, B., & Alalaf, S. (2013). Prevalence and characteristics of polycystic ovarian syndrome in a sample of infertile Kurdish women attending IVF infertility center in maternity teaching hospital of Erbil City. Open Journal of Obste-trics and Gynecology, 3(7), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2013.37104 
  24. Idrisa, A. (2005). Infertility. In: Kwawukume EY, Emuveyan EE (eds), Comprehensive Gyna-ecology in the Tropics. Graphic packaging Ltd, Ghana, 333-345.
  25. Igwegbe, A., Eleje, G., and Enechukwu, C. (2013). Polycystic ovary syndrome: a review of management outcomes in a low resource setting. Journal of Womens Health, Issues and Care, 2(3), 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2325-9795.1000110 
  26. Jayashree, S., Shylaja, P., and Ajjammanavar, V. (2019). Insulin resistance in obese and lean women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Inter-national Journal of Reproduction, Contracep-tion, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8(1), 63-69. http://www.ijrcog.org/index.php 
  27. Kaiser, U. B. (2012). Hyperprolactinemia and infertility: new insights. The Journal of clinical investigation, 122(10), 3467-3468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI64455  
  28. Karabulut, A.B., Cakmak, M., Kiran, R.T, and Sahin, I. (2012). Oxidative stress status, meta-bolic profile and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Medi-cal Science (Turkey), 1, 27-34.
  29. Kaur, K.K,Allahbadia, G., and Singh, M. (2018). An update of impact of obesity on female inferti-lity and its management. Int J Pregn & Chi Birth, 4(2), 88–94.  https://doi.org/10.15406/ipcb.2018.04.00089  
  30. Khan, S. H., Rizvi, S. A., Shahid, R., and Manzoor, R. (2021). Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEAS) Levels in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS). Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan: JCPSP, 31(3), 253-257. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2021.03.253  
  31. Khmil, M., Khmil, S., and Marushchak, M. (2020). Hormone Imbalance in Women with Infertility Caused by Polycystic Ovary Synd-rome: Is There a Connection with Body Mass Index? Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(B), 731 737. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.4569  
  32. Kiddy, D. S., Sharp, P. S., White, D. M. (1990). Differences in clinical and endocrine features between obese and non‐obese subjects with polycystic ovary syndrome: an analysis of 263 consecutive cases. Clinical endocrinology, 32 (2), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1990.tb00857.x 
  33. Kovacs, G. T. (2004). Polycystic ovarian disease: an overview. Reviews in Gynaecological Prac-tice, 4(2), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rigp.2004.01.003 
  34. Lee, J.Y., Baw, C.K., Gupta, S. (2010).  Role of oxidative stress in polycystic ovary syndrome. Current Women Health Review, 6, 96-107.
  35. Maharaj, S., and Amod, A. (2009). Polycystic ovary syndrome. Journal of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes in South Africa, 14(2), 86-95. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC64198 
  36. March, W. A., Moore, V. M., Willson, K. J. (2010). The prevalence of polycystic ovary syn-drome in a community sample assessed under contrasting diagnostic criteria. Human repro-duction, 25(2), 544-551. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep399 
  37. Marilyn, R., and Richardson, M.D. (2003). Cur-rent Perspectives in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. American Family Physician, 68, 697-705.
  38. Moran, C., Arriaga, M., Rodriguez, G., and Moran, S. (2012). Obesity differentially affects phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Inter-national Journal of Endocrinology, 317241. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/317241 
  39. Nas FS, Yahaya A, Muazu L, Halliru SN, and Ali M. (2020). Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis among pregnant women attending ante-natal care in Kano, Nigeria. Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., 2(2), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.34104/ejmhs.020.39045   
  40. National Institute of Health. (2012). Evidence-based methodology workshop on polycystic ov-ary syndrome. https://prevention.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/FinalReport.pdf.  Accessed 22 Jan 2014 
  41. Obuna, J. A., Ndukwe, E. O., Ugboma, H. A., Ejikeme, B. N., and Ugboma, E. W. (2012). Clinical presentation of infertility in an out-patient clinic of a resource poor setting, South-East Nigeria. International Journal Tropical Disease Health, 2(2), 123-131.
  42. Omokanye, L.O., Ibiwoye-Jaiyeola, O.A., Ola-tinwo, A.W.O. (2015). Polycystic Ovarian Syn-drome: Analysis of Management Outcomes among Infertile Women at a Public Health Ins-titution in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of General Practice, 13, 44-48. https://doi.org/10.4103/1118-4647.170152 
  43. Oyebanji, O. G., Asaolu, M. F., Amonimo, E. O. (2018). Hormonal Imbalance in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (Pcos) in Teaching Hospitals in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Open Journal of Obste-trics and Gynecology, 8(13), 1456-1464. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2018.813147  
  44. Palomba, S., Santagni, S., Falbo, A., and La Sala, G. B. (2015). Complications and challen-ges associated with polycystic ovary syndrome: current perspectives. International journal of womens health, 7, 745. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S70314  
  45. Pembe, A. B., and Abeid, M. S. (2009). Poly-cystic ovaries and associated clinical and bio-chemical features among women with infertility in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. Tanzania journal of health research, 11(4), 4-6. https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v11i4.50172  
  46. Rosenfield, R.L., and Ehrmann, D.A. (2016). The pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the hypothesis of PCOS as functional ovarian hyperandrogenism revisited. Journal of Endocrine Review, 37, 467–520. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2015-1104  
  47. Saadia, Z. (2020). Follicle stimulating hormone (LH: FSH) ratio in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) obesevs. non-obese women. Medical Archives, 74(4), 289. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2020.74.289-293  
  48. Sampurna, K., Reddy, B. V., Vijayaraghavan, R., Rajesh, P. (2017). Role of Steroid Hormones in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) in South Indian Women. International Journal of Research in Ayurveda and Pharmacy, 8, 234-237.
  49. Setji, T. K., and Brown, A. J. (2007). PCOS: Diagnosis and treatment. American Journal of Medicine, 120(2), 128-132.
  50. Sharif IH, Tamanna S, Mosaib MG, Tamanna N, Haque MA, Jamal MAHM, and Uddin ME. (2019). Assessment and biomonitoring of the effect of rapeseeds oil on wister rat organs. Am. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 1(4), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.34104/ajpab.019.0192029   
  51. Stamatiades, G. A., and Kaiser, U. B. 2018. Gonadotropin regulation by pulsatile GnRH: signaling and gene expression. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 463, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2017.10.015 
  52. Suturina, L. V., Atalyan, A. V., Darzhaev, Z. Y. (2017). Overweight and obesity prevalence in referral population of infertile women with poly-cystic ovary syndrome. Advances in Obesity, Weight Management and Control, 7(1), 188-188.
  53. Tarlatzis, B. C., Fauser, B. C. J. M., Legro, R. S. (2008). Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Human Repro-duction, 23(3), 462-477. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem426 
  54. Ugwu, G.O., Iyoke, C.A., Onah, H.E., and Mba, S.G. (2013). Prevalence, Presentation and Man-agement of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Enugu, South East Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 22, 313-316.
  55. Vaduneme, K.O., and Chidi, O. (2019). Preva-lence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Among Infertile Women Attending Fertility Clinic at a University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Journal of Gynecology and Womens Health, 15(5), 555922. https://doi.org/10.19080/JGWH.2019.15.555922  
  56. Yan-Min, M., Ma, Y. M., Li, R., Qiao, J. (2010). Characteristics of abnormal menstrual cycle and polycystic ovary syndrome in community and hospital populations. Chinese Medical Journal, 123(16), 2185-218. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.201 0.16.005  
  57. Yue, L., Shi, G.Z., Gang, L., Chi, K.L., Zhi, Q.X. (2017). Identification of Reference Genes for qRT-PCR in Granulosa Cells of Healthy Women and Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Pa-tients. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 6961. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28761164/  

Article Info:

Academic Editor 

Dr. Phelipe Magalhães Duarte, Professor, Department of Veterinary, Faculty of Biological and Health Sciences, University of Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.

Received

May 15, 2022

Accepted

June 22, 2022

Published

July 1, 2022

Article DOI: 10.34104/ejmhs.022.01000110

Corresponding author

Onitsha Enebrayi Nelson*
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Basic Sciences, College of Health Science, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Cite this article

Ezeiruaku FC., and Onitsha EN. (2022). Assessment of biochemical markers in polycystic ovarian syndrome patients in the Niger Delta region, Nigeria. Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., 4(4), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.34104/ejmhs.022.01000110 

Views
241
Download
362
Citations
Badge Img
Share