The paper investigates to seek answers on the extent of management in the educational system and practice for a guide in the academic transformation of the respondents especially on its contribution to the educational system. A mixed method of research is utilized in the study which focuses on Focused Group Discussion. Likewise, purposive and quota sampling techniques are employed in gathering the sample size and population of the study. The study comprised fifty (50) respondents only. Results show that extent of management of the educational system and practice as a guide for academic transformation explores and influences the mechanism of the context leadership transformation, shows that educational equity collaborates essentially on the equity issues and potentials, shows that educational motivation morale and improvement measures the quality of the improved motivation and knowledge in the educational system, show that student experiences establish mutual trust atmosphere, and encourages the interest of subordinates in school organization benefits, show that strengthening school culture reveals and focuses on leadership perspective in educational organization and strength through a school program and identity, and show that innovation skills in management leadership provide strategic requirement fulfillment of educational system and process which aligned to the mission and vision of school towards innovation and transformation of knowledge. Findings show that there is a significant relationship between the extent of management in the educational system and practice as a guide in the academic transformation as observed by the respondents.
Management of educational system and practice towards academic transformation is concerned in the organization process. It is the process of planning, leading, organizing, directing the school activities to accomplish the objectives of the school system and organization. It helps in familiarization of faculties in matters of effective educational management. It is capable of making leaders efficient in teaching adjustment for individual students, emotional needs, and cognitive process of teaching. It examines educational setting in teaching and learning intervention especially in the implementation of student performance, learning activities, direct instruction, learning reflection, and student interest as guides in academic transformation. It explores the contribution of adaptable theory of teaching as to resourcefulness, effectiveness, efficiency, honesty, creativity, adaptability, enthusiasm, and talent. It encourages transparent communication as part of the educational system and practice management in reflecting and understanding the concept of academic transformation (Mallillin, 2022, pp. 99-121). Hence, leadership plays a vital role in creating the success and condition of educational level and system training. School leaders are effective links in the management system and attainment success of school organization.
The educational management system and practice has to do with the competency level of educational leaders in the school organization. This explores professional competency in the management system and setting of school practice. This can innovate technical teaching of the young minds in molding and shaping knowledge of students. It explores and examines the skills of educational leaders and faculties and manages performance and skills of faculties, and administrators to equip with challenges in the educational system according to the trends of the school setting and system (Mallillin, & Mallillin, 2019; Mallillin, 2023).
On the other hand, educational transformation prevails in the educational model school system and changes from good, better, and best. It distinguishes renovation and reform of educational management system and practice in the academic transformation. It maintains the substance of the learning process and traditional teaching organizational structure. Educational transformation identifies contribution of system theory and professional development approach especially on skills in dealing with faculties and staff. It deals on the theory of quality education as to reflection theory skills, effectiveness of theory skills, implementation of theory skills, observed model theory skills, standard requirement theory skills, and acquiring knowledge theory skills. It shows how to develop knowledge in educational transformation and model for academic excellence and performance management system and practice. It contributes to understanding the knowledge and instruction process because the goal of transformative education is changing the system for good, better, and best. The focus is the student as the center of learning in the current normal of teaching (Mallillin, & Laurel, 2022). This identifies favorable outcome performance of faculties and satisfaction based on educational transformation model. The performance is being recognized in terms of interest in teaching, benefits, salaries, wages, promotion, career development, teaching and learning process. Relationship with superiors, and relationship with colleagues. Educational transformation explores job performance and job satisfaction of employees in teaching profession. This is the motivation given for the efforts to be rewarded that can boost faculty morale to the fullest in the educational system and organization. It highlights work commitment, challenges, and concept development sustainability (Mallillin, 2021).
Notably, the educational transformation practice of the school system can guide academic practitioners to the fullest. It empowers the learners resiliency, attitude, values, skills, and knowledge. It prepares adaptable contribution for the uncertain future of every individual learner and sustainable development well-being. It increases the school system for more ambiguous learning to foster institutionalized disruption of inequities in education. It prevents uncertainties and complication effort for a better transformation management system to be measured in the school practice. It provides uncertainties on consequences to a persuasive educational setting in making analysis for school system management transformation and framework. It advances school organization in the educational system to persuade uncertainty and formation. It establishes technical educational transformation school system practice on the impact and concept development to manifest various context level systems in school organization. It mitigates and interrelates strategy to be fostered on educational transformation and improvement services (Yurkofsky, 2022, pp. 399-410). Also, leadership uplifts and manages school organization to the fullest. It provides wide impact and implication, transformation, and management system, practice, and paradigm. It advances standard appropriate effective knowledge management of educational transformation necessary for the society and demand of the school system and setting. Transformational educational system management implication practice is associated with the requirement role and identification of opportunity to improve student. It establishes and improves the educational management school system as a guide in the academic transformation development, and organization (Shahbal et al., 2022, pp. 1452-1460). Indeed, the aims and goals of transformative education anticipate the understanding process of learners and the change process, managing uncertainty, empathy, diversity appreciation, value change, and critical thinking. The objectives are the identity learning ideas & transformation in the educational system. It sustains and incorporates the focus and development of education system in various school institutions. It focuses on student development as well as to well-being, critical thinking, and respect. It explores sustainable development in academic trans-formation in analyzing detail content of the lesson. It reflects transformative education in various ways in teaching method, content, objectives, & goals, (Malli-llin, 2020, pp. 1-11). It reflects on transformative education in teaching based on the needs of students as the centers of learning. It redefines urgent academic transformation management of the educational system practice to generate experiences, references, & mean-ing of the vision of the school institution (Jeronen et al., 2021). Yet, aims & goals of transformative education serve as the transition in sustainable development. It acknowledges various gaps, issues, management sys-tem, & practice as academic transformation guide in school organization. This includes proper implementation of education among students success of academic transformation (Weiland et al., 2021, pp. 90-95).
Statement of the Problem
Hypothesis
There is a significant relationship on the extent man-agement in the educational system and practice as a guide in the academic transformation as observed by the respondents.
Research Design
Mixed method of research is utilized in the study which focuses on Focused Group Discussion (FGD). Quantitative research is used to measure the extent in management of educational systems and practice as a guide in academic transformation of the respondents & qualitative research is used to analyze the management of educational systems and practice that can contribute to a guide for academic transformation among the respondents. It introduces a concept on assessment of management system transformation and phenomenon purposes (Akerblad et al., 2021, pp.152-170).
Respondents of the Study
The respondents of the study are the selected educational leaders in various educational institutions like the Department of Education (DepEd), Commission on Higher Education (CHED), and Technical Educational Skills Development Authority (TESDA). They are directors, assistant directors, managers, assistant managers, deans, principals, coordinators, head, and administrators. They are currently connected or working in various educational institutions. The study comprised fifty (50) respondents only.
Sampling Techniques
The research utilized purposive and quota sampling techniques. Purposive sampling is subjective sampling in identifying the sample size in the study for the set criteria on selected educational leadership and management practice for transformation in the school organization. It is a selective based criteria defined in selec-ting sample size, and judgmental identity of the researchers. It is a non-probability sampling where the research used judgment in selecting members to be a part of the study. The survey sampling requires methods and prior knowledge of eligible platforms in the study. Purposive sampling accesses the subset of the participants in the particular profile. It provides purposive sampling in antecedent and analysis leadership (Berndt, 2020, pp. 224-226).
1) What is the extent in the management of the educational system and practice for a guide in the academic transformation of the respondents?
Table 1 presents the weighted mean and the corresponding interpretation on the extent of management of educational systems and practices as a guide for academic transformation of the respondents. It shows that rank 1 is shared by the two indicators which are “It explores and influences mechanism leadership context of transformation”, and “It establishes mutual trust atmosphere.
Table 1: Extent in the Management of Educational System and Practice as Guide for Academic Transformation of the Respondents.
Encourages interest subordinates of school organization benefits”, with a weighted mean of 4.22 or Strongly Agree which means that management of educational system practice is highly observed. Rank 2 is also shared by the two indicators which are “It motivates school leadership and commitment in the critical role among educators or teachers academic performance and sustainable improvement”, and “It measures quality improved motivation and knowledge”, with a weighted mean of 4.20 or Strongly Agree which means that system practice is highly observed. Rank 3 is also shared by the two indicators which are “It emerges school culture and strengthens modern situation in the school organization”, and “It analyzes structure and effect on competency of transformational leadership among them”, with a weighted mean of 4.12 or Agree which means that management of educational system practice is observed. The least in rank is shared by the two indicators which are “It predicts relation-ship on social and emotional positivity of transfor-mational leadership competency from teachers, stud-ents, and environment process school organization”, and “It is a strategic requirement fulfillment of educa-tional system and process aligned to the mission, and vision of school toward innovation and transformation of knowledge”, with a weighted mean of 3.36 or Moderately Agree which means that management of educational system practice is limited. The overall average weighted mean is 3.83 (SD=0.313) or Agree which means the extent of management of the educational system and practice as a guide for academic transformation is observed among the respondents.
2) On the test of the significant relationship on the extent of management in educational system and practice as a guide in academic transformation of the respondents
Table 2: Test of Significant Relationship on the Extent of Management in Educational System and Practice as a Guide in Academic Transformation as Observed by the Respondents.
Table 2 presents the test of significant relationship on the extent of management in the educational system and practice as a guide in the academic transformation of the respondents. It shows that the z computed value is higher than the z critical value of ±1.96 which is significant and resulted in rejection of the hypothesis. Therefore, it is safe to say that there is a significant relationship on the extent of management in the educational system and practice as a guide in the academic transformation as observed by the respondents.
3) What makes the management of the educational system and practice that can contribute to a guide for academic transformation among the respondents?
Table 3: Thematic analysis on Core Ideas on Management of Educational System and Practice to Academic Transformation.
Educational Equity
Educational equity highlights guidelines and policy on equity of education that focuses on the learners and background. It conceptualizes advantages and disadvantages of practice in management of education to be addressed. It widens the position of educational system and practice as to academic transition and guideline. It identifies and reflects context as to marginalize practice for educational equity (Patfield et al., 2022, pp. 23-41). The participant says that:
“It addresses procedures and policy issues for the resources, allocation, and student engagement” (T1, P17 & P9).
“It collaborates essentially on the equity issues, potentials, and proactive ways to engage from various challenges in educational equity” (T1, P25 & P17).
“It explores career, advocacy, and policy in pursuing equity in education” (T1, P14 & P5).
“It provides educational equity status on performance of individual school organization” (T1, P20 & P14).
Educational Motivation Morale and Improvement
Educational motivation, morale, and improvement produce a holistic intelligent decision making process & practice to better guide students in academic transformation. It interprets transferring, and learning knowledge to be cultivated. It values educational institutions and school culture of behavioral formation, ideas, thoughts, perception, attitude, and norms (Karsono et al., 2022, pp. 6832-6841). The participants say that:
“It motivates school leadership and commitment in a critical role among educators or teachers' academic performance and sustainable improvement” (T2, P14 & P9).
“It measures quality improved motivation and knowledge in the educational system” (T2, P19 & P 10).
“It encourages school organization and advantage utilization of position in the major component of education morale and improvement” (T2, P16 & P 13).
“It analyses the method and effect of motivation and morale improvement in the educational system and process” (T2, P10 & P11).
Student Experiences
Student experiences in academic transformation as to management and practice to determine learning satisfaction associated with self-efficacy. It expresses to improve and explore needs for learning technology and self-efficacy management to enhance knowledge and experiences among students as the centers of learning (Aldhahi et al., 2022, pp. 1323-1340). The participants say that:
“It explores and influences mechanism of the transformational leadership context” T3, P17 & P 10.
“It analyzes the structure and effect on competency of the transformational leadership among them” T3, P23 & P15.
“It predicts relationships on social and emotional positivity of transformational leadership competency from teachers, students, and the environment process of the school organization” T3, P20 & P13.
“It establishes a mutual trust atmosphere, and encourages interest among the subordinates of school organization benefits” T3, P29 & P19.
Strengthening School Culture
Strengthening school culture has an influenced in the practice as a guide to academic transformation that could motivate student learning process as well as the faculties. It indicates realization of character education strength and planning to carry and equip competency. It develops the function of a dignified educational system as to responsible professional faculty, democratic, independent, creative, and capability (Dasmana et al., 2022, pp. 361-377). The participants say that:
“It emerges from school culture and strengthens the modern situation in the educational organization” (T4, P25 & P18).
“It drives individual global culture for rebranding images of school organization” (T4, P20 & P12).
“It models the strength and value identity for student and school organization” (T4, P29 & P17).
“It reveals and focuses leadership perspective in school organization and strength through school program and identity” (T4, P30 & P15).
Innovation Skills in Management Leadership
Innovation skills in management leadership are nece-ssary practice to academic transformation of students. It explores impact and imposition of the change on emotional reaction and organizational climate. It influences factors and innovation behavior of social cognitive perspective in adopting management leader-ship on educational system. It contributes to managerial thinking ability of creative leadership style in an organizational system, process, and climate (Ye et al., 2022, pp. 1092-1114). The participants say that:
“Innovation fills the gap for the management change to produce quality education in school organization”. T5, P20 & P13
“It examines innovation transformation and good practices in school organization resulting in illustrative generalization”T5, P23 & P15.
“It is a strategic requirement to fulfill the educational system and process aligned to the mission, and vision of school toward innovation and transformation of knowledge” T5, P35 & P8.
“It provides details of the underlying success and component of innovation in school organization and transformation” T5, P15 & P11.
The extent system and practice to educational management as guide for academic transformation explores and influences mechanism of transformational leadership context, establishes mutual trust atmosphere, and encourages interest subordinates of school organization's benefits. This includes the motivation of school leadership and commitment in critical role among edu-cators on sustainable improvement. It measures quality improved motivation and knowledge. This is includes teaching techniques and strategies in the academic performance of student and domain of learning. It is designated typically on students as centers of learning that could provide better system and practice in academic transformation such as enhancing the learning practices, experiences in teaching, and interest school system. It designs learning process for various activities to participate and explore knowledge in in-depth activities and educational management academic transformation of students. It provides facilities for student perspective approach to learning. It explores educational system and practice as guide in academic transformation for good, better, and best (Mallillin et al., 2021). On the other hand, it shows to emerge school culture and strengthens modern situation in the school organization. This includes analysis of structure and effect on competency of transformational leadership among them. It also predicts relationship on social and emotional positivity of transformational leadership competency from teachers, students, and environment process school organization. This includes strategic requirement fulfillment of educational system and process aligned to the mission, and vision of school toward innovation and transformation of knowledge. It defines teaching work and application of profession of being a faculty that involves and features management of educational system and practice as guide to academic transformation of students (Mallillin, 2021). Accordingly, educational equity collaborates essentially on the issues, potentials, and proactive ways to engage from various challenges in educational equity. It provides equity status of education on the performance of individual school organization. Implication of better quality education contributed to commitment toward the system and practice. This can guide to a better academic transformation. It ensures the quest of the system and practice for sustainable development. It enlightens the rationale of modernity educational system and practice management. It describes educational equity focusing on individual needs for students as the centers of learning in connection with management of educational systems and practice. It provides motivation to assess resources for educational fairness, equity, and inclusion. It promotes educational equity that explains management educational system, facili-ties, and resources. It addresses policy for educational equity, creative arts, and development of education to provide academic transformation and system and practice (Takyi, 2021, pp. 157-182). Furthermore, educational equity addresses procedures and policy issues for the resources, allocation and student engagement. This includes exploration of career, advocacy, and policy in pursuing equity education. It is an approach and improved system for educational policy guideline for academic transformation on management. It is promisingly hailed to achieve equity in education. Hence, educational management systems and practice can better guide the academic transformation of learners. It promotes integration of educational equity and novel approaches (Bush-Mecenas, 2022, pp. 461-499).
Moreover, educational motivation morale and improvement in management practice guides academic transformation measurement for quality education improvement motivation. It encourages school organization and advantage utilization of position in major components of education morale and improvement. It incre-ases adoption of various educational institution to improve quality education. It enhances management and student knowledge for academic transformation. It develops an impact in technology of education that progresses mediated learning for academic transformation in different educational institution and implementation. It provides impact on accessibility and content system in relation to critical thinking enhancement of student academic transformation self-efficacy and determination. Hence, educational motivation, morale, and improvement knowledge resources in academic transformation enhances learning experiences on potential engagement to improve academic transformation through practice (Prifti, 2022, pp. 111-125). Moreover, it motivates school leadership commitment to a critical role among educators or teachers academic performance and sustainable improvement. It analyses the effect of motivation morale improvement and process. It influences integration of knowledge, professional teaching through management educational system and practice for a guide to academic transformation of students as the centers of learning. It focuses on beliefs and learning enhancement of students depending on the policies being implemented on academic transformation and objective practice. It deals with the assessment of knowledge and implementation management of educational system and practice (Mallillin et al., 2020). Similarly, student experiences on management practice in the system as a basis for guidance in academic transformation since it establishes a mutual trust atmosphere, and encourages interest of subordinate school organization. It analyzes structure and effect on competency transformational leadership among them. It brought different issues and challenges for educational management system and practice impact to academic transformation. It explores adjusted learning modality based on needs of learners being implemented in the educational system and practice experience. It employs the concept of student experiences to academic transformation equipped with curriculum design for better educational system and prac-tice. It exhibits and expands knowledge, awareness, practice, and competency. It engages in academic conditions and activities. It tends to provide teaching strategies and methods of learning. It provides ultimate goals for academic transformation practice and system in the educational management process (Gu & Huang, 2022). Nevertheless, it predicts relationships on social and emotional positivity of transformational leadership competency from teachers, students, and environment process school organization. It explores and influences mechanism transformational leadership context. It facilitates learning extent of ensuring quality education as a guide in academic transformation management in educational system practice and implementation. It transitions learning effect and experiences in various higher education institutions. It provides better intervention on educational management practice and system (Keane et al., 2022). Certainly, strengthening school culture in management of educational system & practice as guide to academic transformation reveals and focuses on leadership perspective in school organization and strength through school program and identity. It models strength and value identity for student and school organization. It identifies factors of improved retention level of students as the centers of learning. It provides impact on key factors in strengthening school culture management and practice system of education. It influences educational organization on school culture and reputation. It provides quality teaching for better guide to academic transfor-mation model for student. It undertakes the strength and activities of school and students. It influences techniques, methods, and strategies to maintain strong school culture development and implementation of the organizational system and practice in educational management. It highlights the perceived influence of qua-lity education for students (Al Hassani, & Wilkins, 2022). Nevertheless, it emerges school culture and strengthens modern situation in school organization. It drives individual global culture for rebranding images of school organization. It develops the basis of healthy and quality education as implemented on the school culture system in addressing the needs and response of management educational system and practice. This will lead to better academic guide among students. It considers school culture and evolution for contem-porary process in educational management system and practice. It examines strength of school culture and evolution. It innovates the path for a revitalized school adaptation. It improves opportunity strength of school culture in management of educational system and practice. It emphasizes sustainable education policy & development (Vamos, & McDermott, 2021, pp. 670-676).
Indeed, innovation skills in management leadership provides strategic requirement fulfillment of the educational system and process aligned to the mission, and vision of school toward innovation and transformation of knowledge. It also examines innovation transformation, and good practice in school organization resul-ting in illustrative generalization. It explores the effect of transformational leadership in management of edu-cational system and practice, especially on academic performance of students as centers of learners. It shows innovation skills in the management educational system engaged on initiative of a leader. It understands the innovation of educational organization system and practice. It improves the process. It defines system and practice of educational management as to faculty initiative, school level, and curriculum design as guide to academic transformation (Purwanto et al., 2021). Lastly, innovation fills the gap for management change to produce quality education in school organization. It provides details of the underlying success and component of innovation in school organization and transformation. It is determined to attempt inherent work-force diversity acquisition innovation skills man-agement leadership system and practice for implementation of workplace climate, diversity, uniqueness, belongingness, and fairness. It contributes to better school leadership climate and innovation characteristics (Chaudhry et al., 2021).
The extent of management educational system and practice as guide for academic transformation shows to explore and influence mechanism of transformational leadership context where it establishes mutual trust atmosphere and encourages interest subordinate of school organization benefit. It shows that educational equity collaborates essentially on equity issues, potentials, and proactive ways to engage from various challenges in educational equity where it provides educational equity status performance of individual school organization. It shows that educational motivation morale and improvement measures quality of improved motivation and knowledge in the educational system where it encourages school organization and advantage utilization of position in the major component of education morale and improvement. It shows that student experiences establishes a mutual trust atmosphere, and encourages interest among subordinates of school organization benefit where it ana-lyzes structure and effect on competency of transformational leadership among them. It shows that strengthening school culture reveals and focuses on leadership perspective school organization and strength through school program and identity where it models the strength and value identity for student and school organization. It shows that innovation skills management leadership provides strategic requirement fulfillment of educational system and process aligned to the mission, and vision of school toward innovation & transformation of knowledge where it examines innovation transformation and good practice school organization resulting in illustrative generalization. It shows that there is a significant relationship on the extent of management in the educational system and practice as a guide in the academic transformation as observed by the respondents.
The researchers wish to acknowledge people behind the success of the research work most especially to the respondents who contributed to the substance of the study. Likewise, to their love ones and most especially to their family for the whole support in the success of this research. Thank you to all of you.
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this rese-arch. This is purposely for publication to share infor-mation in the public.
UniversePG does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted UniversePG a non-exclusive, worldwide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
Academic Editor
Dr. Sonjoy Bishwas, Executive, Universe Publishing Group (UniversePG), California, USA
Department of Undergraduate Studies, Faculty of Education, Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines
Mallillin LLD., and Caranguian RG. (2023). Management of educational system and practice: a guide to academic transformation, Br. J. Arts Humanit., 5(3), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.34104/bjah.02301310141