In this research, in order to find the most effective colours, we reached natural and non-pigmented colours called structural colours, and after reviewing the research done on them, we tested their quality and quantity of effectiveness to ensure their higher effectiveness (physical, emotional, perceptual and aesthetic effects). After that, we extracted to the important points and the appropriate product level to apply their advantages. These colours can create golden opportunities for the designer due to their different effectiveness especially in creating a user experience in emotional design. This article is to draw the attention of industrial designers to the possibility of using the results of structural colour research despite all limitations.
Colour has many different definitions from every pers-pective which in most of them, the nature of colour is not separate from light. A general definition is that colour is the property we perceive based on the way an object emits or reflects visible light or how the surface of matter interacts with light. It is a psychophysio-logical phenomenon, it has both psychological and physiological effects, and is also one of the most impo-rtant environmental stimuli, but what kind of colours are the most effective colours? Today, we know the role of colour in psychology and the importance of colour psychology in creating a user experience, that one of the main areas of it is web design, but the question is, what is the importance of colour-focused user experience in web design compared to other de-sign fields? The importance of colour in this field is due to the difference and high quality of the colour on displays compared to non-backlight colours, such as colours in the body and components of products. As the colour effect of displays is greater due to the opti-cal nature, the psychological effects of colour on the user also increase. So in this research we introduce and investigate colours that are similar to the colours pro-duced on displays but are produced in another way and they can be used to enhance the colour user experience in product design, where there is not necessarily backlight and the only available light is ambient light, they are called structural colours. Structural colours can increase the opportunity for the designer to create a great emotional user experience without any back-light (Pathiranage, 2021).
These colours have a high emotional quality and as we know, the involvement of emotions play an important role in the user interaction with the product and conse-quently the user experience (Sokolova & Fernández-Caballero, 2015). So we are going to use these colours on the surfaces and body of the products to create an emotional user experience, aesthetics and visual per-suasion (Lindgaard, 2007). To identify the best colours according to bionic principles, we went to nature and biological species and we came to structural colours (non-backlight supported colours) that can compare with the colours produced on displays (backlight supported colours). According to the bionic method, nature is source of the most complete and optimal phenolmena, so we looked for the best colour effects of biological species. According to researches on the best colour effects in nature (In terms of the production mechanisms, durability, visual quality and aesthetics ( the most obvious is related to structural colours, which are seen in the colourful feathers of birds, butterfly wings and crust of some insects and so on, colours with superior visual effects and great emotional qua-lity, high durability and excellent stability.
The colours we usually use in the arts and industry, in general they are inks or pigments but in nature, there are structural colours in combination with pigments or independently that are fundamentally different from each other. Although many years of researches has started in structural colours, but it has not yet been used in industrial design (product design), while the benefits of these colours are so in line with industrial design aspirations. So in this research, we try to iden-tify the proper principles for applying their benefits in product design after examining the aesthetic and effe-ctiveness of these colours.
To do this, we first need to know the differences, simi-larities and limitations in each colour group (pigment colours and structural colours) and then align with the technology and production constraints and design req-uirements.
Fig. 1: Some exampels of structural colors.
Research method
This is an applied research conducted in two phases of literature review and cross-sectional research. In the first part, some samples of papers about the nature of the colour and the colour production mechanism in the best colourful effects of biological species were deli-berately selected and studied (According to the Bionic method) (Biró et al., 2009; Dumanli & Savin, 2016; Ghiradella & Butler, 2009; Michielsen et al., 2009; Seago et al., and Vignolini et al., 2011; Vukusic & Stavenga, 2009; Yoshioka et al., 2007) and the sum-mary of the relevant cases is given in the discussion. In the second part, we used the followings to obtain infor-mation to compare three general features (F1, F2, F3)1 in the three groups of colours (G1, G2, G3)2
1) F1 (Visual quality): To compare the attracting attention or visual persuasion level of all three groups, 100 persons were selected equally by quota sampling from two groups of men and wo-men (20 to 50 years old) and we showed them three colour samples of the same hue but of a different natures (G1, G2, G3) and we asked them to choose the most attractive and beautiful one.
2) F2 (Emotional and perceptual quality): We inter-viewed them to find out their emotional and per-ceptual qualities from the three colour groups and their reasons for the selection.
3) F3 (Physical reactions): To compare physical re-actions, we designed an experiment by using VR technology (virtual reality) to simulate struc-tural colours effects (Despite of limited facilities and funding), so we were able to simulate the colour characteristics of each colour group, and finally we exposed them to three colour groups for a certain period of time and recorded their body changes and reactions (The range of body temperature changes and the amount of body movements and reactions).
The information obtained from review of the articles showed that in the most premier colourful effects in terms of visual and emotional quality, there is a trace of structural colours (Independently or in conjunction with pigments) this part led to the identification and classification of similarities and the differences as well as the advantages and limitations. The second part showed that, most interviewed found the independent effect of structural colours (G2) to be somewhat milder than their effects with pigments (G3) and stronger than (G1). Other information obtained from the interview-ees led to a comparison of three categories of moti-vational characteristics of colours (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2: Comparison of the motivational characteristics of pigment colours, structural colours and pigmentratural4 colours.
1) G1 (Pigment colours): The results showed that the pigment colours (G1) which produce colour by the absorption and reflection mechanism, attr-act less attraction compared to the other colours (G2, G3), they also had lower emotional and aes-thetic quality for participants and created a lower rates of physical changes.
2) G2 (Structural colours): The results of this step showed that the structural colours which pro-duced purer effects by the mechanism of diffr-action and refraction attract more attraction than the (G1). The participants also rated the emo-tional and aesthetic quality of these colours more than (G1) because of their luminosity and dyna-mic effects. They also stated that these colours evoke some sense of preciousness and origin-ality, luxury and uniqueness. The physical chan-ges they made were also greater than the (G1), because of their optical nature.
3) G3 (combination of G1 and G2): This group was better in all cases because of the characteristics of both groups simultaneously (G1 + G2).
The results of the above comparison chart can be sum-marized in the following table:
Table 1: Comparison of motivational characteristics of pigment, structural colours & pigmentratural colours.
The results showed that the colour production mecha-nisms based on absorption and reflection of visible light (pigment colour mechanism) produce different colour properties compared to the colour production mechanisms based on refraction and diffraction of light (structural colour mechanism) in terms of physical and mental properties (F1, F2, F3). Table 1 shows that, the independent qualities of the structural colours are stronger than the pigment colours, because the hues in the structural colours are purer and softer (Zhao et al., 2012) because of the wavelength nature.
But the superior qualities of the pigmentratural colours are quite evident in comparison to the pigment colours, because these colours have both natures at the same time (absorption-reflection and refraction-diffraction). G2 and G3 can also create a stronger colour user exp-erience in product design, because their colour quality is more optical nature compared to the pigment colours, so they have more potential for energy ex-change and emotional stimulation, in other hand pig-ments turn dark when combined, their hues quality decreases; (Subtraction effect), but coloured lights are not like that, they do not darken when combined rather, they become bright and radiant and turn to visible light (Additive effect). According to the results, G2 and G3 evoke a sense of preciousness and origin-ality for the viewers because the manifestations of nature in our collective unconscious are always accep-table and pleasant, and these are the things that the industrial designer can use intelligently to create a superior colour UX in product design. So based on this study, colours can be classified in terms of the pro-duction mechanism in three groups (G1, G2, G3) and according to the features of each of group, their differ-rences and similarities can be extracting to manage their application in design.
Pigment colours (G1)
In the group of pigment colours, the colour effect is the result of solid particles which based on its chemical properties absorbs some parts of the visible light and reflects the other part, and we see and understand the reflected part as a colour. In the other words chemical or pigment-based colourations involves photoelectrical energy consumption and conversion (Zhao, 2016). So in this group, the emotional quality, aesthetics and excitement level depends on the chemical quality of the pigments, it means the main variable in this group is the chemical quality of the pigments and the sub variables are hue, saturation, value ,subtractive effect, additive effect and so on. These are the same colours that are commonly used in most products and their wide range of usage is not the subject of this research. In this study, we investigate the structural colours and their potential in creating a stronger user experience in product design. The advantages of (G1) are the variety of types, reasonable prices and always availability and their limitations are their chemical nature (Probability of environmental pollution), less effectiveness and dur-ability compared to the G2 and G3.
Structural colours (G2)
These are coloured lights which are resulting from diffraction and refraction of visible light in very dense and delicate nanometer bio structures, and create a rainbow or seven-colour effect (Fig. 3). The features of this group are having a purer hue with controlled brilliance and high durability, which ultimately creates a beautiful and attractive effect (Fig. 3). High dura-bility of these colours is due to the non-dependence on pigments, and as long as the light scattering structures are healthy inside the bio materials, they will continue to produce a colourful effect, like very old fossils that still retain parts of their structure and still continue to produce colourful effects (Fig. 4), durability of the colour in old coloured fossils is due to their nonpig-mented nature, some parts of three-dimensional struc-tures are preserved in the fossils and continue to diffr-act light and produce colour effects. On the other hand, the reasons for their emergence in the nature in cam-brian explosion also emphasize to their superiority and development (Zhao, 2016). An age in which orga-nisms had to evolve to survive, so structural colours emerged to help draw attention to mating. So the emo-tional quality, aesthetics and excitement level in this group depends on the nanoscale structures and the amount of light diffraction of them. Namely, the main variable in this group is the geometry of nano scale structures and it can be designed and controlled by material specialists and applied in the product design and create different user experience. Using these colours in product design can create a superior user experience in the field of colour without the presence of backlight in the body of product. It means more effectiveness than pigment coloration. The limitations of these colours are fluctuations in the colour spectrum as the viewing angle changes, which can be a bonus if consciously incorporated into the design, although structural coatings colours with self coloidical control and angle-independent, are under-way (Magkiriadou et al., 2012).
Fig. 3. Examples of the visual quality of structural colours in biological species.
Fig. 4: Examples of the oldest coloured fossils dating back more than 40 million years (McNamara et al., 2012) Stability and durability of colour due to the structural nature of the colour.
Pigmentratural colours (G3)
These colours come from the conjunction and proxi-mity of the two previous groups, and in this article are briefly called "Pigmentratural colours", (pigment + structural = pigmentratural) with the features of both groups; mild to strong hues, high effectiveness, more controlled shine and more energetic (more energy exchange in effectiveness) which results the appear-ance of superior, more stable, and more effective col-our qualities. The emotional quality, aesthetics and excitement level in this group depends on the two pre-vious variables; the presence and the chemical quality of pigments with the presence and the physical quality of the nanostructures simultaneously which enhances the characteristics of the two previous groups. As the effect of light and colour on physiology and psycho-logy and its role in arousal has been known for many years, and such effects depend on the wavelength of light (Elliot, 2015) and given that each wavelength produces a certain colour, the coloured lights will have different arousal capabilities than the pigment colours. It is here that the psychology of colour becomes more important for applying structural colours in the product design because their psycho-physiological effective-ness is greater than pigment colours due to the optical/ light nature.
Fig. 5: Examples of the pigmentratural colours in biological species.
All three types of colours mentioned above, regardless of their production mechanism and nature, have phy-siological and psychological effects that the quantity and quality of these effects vary across groups. That is in pigment colours, chemical dimension and in struc-tural colours, physical dimension and in pigmentratural colours, both physical and chemical dimensions lead to physiological and psychological effects. Therefore, the first and second groups can be called one-dimensional colours, and the third group can be called two-dimen-sional colours, which is again a reason for their super-iority and more effectiveness. Proper use of these col-ours can be effective in product selection and visual persuasion (related to the first level of emotional design), and it can enhance the colour UX in product design if combined with other principles of user exp-erience. So the use of pigmentratural colours will be effective in a wide range of products as external parts or some strategic parts of the body of the product.
Superior features of G2 and G3
1) High emotional and aesthetic level compared to pigment colours, it means they have more mental effects which cause more psychological and phy-sical reactions. Those effects that lead to changes in amount of physical reactions are the variables of change in the quantity of emotion (physical reac-tions ), and those effects that lead to a change in the type of emotions are the variables related to the quality of emotions (perception and aesthetic qua-lity) and that means their high level of aesthetic stimulation (Nanay, 2016).
2) High level of attracting attention (visual per-suasion) due to high visual quality, dynamic and multicolored effects compared to pigment colours. They create beautiful, attractive, dynamic, ener-getic and durable colours (changeable and multi-hues effects).
3) Matching the features of these colours with indus-trial design approaches:
a) Their quality of visual, emotional, and aes-thetics make them more effective and attr-acting attention so they can create a higher colour user experience, this is in line with the first emotional design level, and this feature can be used with design decisions in the emotional design approach. On the other hand the in-volvement of emotions plays an important role in the users interaction with the product so it is also effective in creating the user experience (high colour UX).
b) High durability of these colours is consistent with the ideas of the sustainable design approach. This means that as long as the colour-producing structures in the surface of the product are healthy, the colour quality of the product will not decrease. Like those old coloured fossils that continue to refract light and create colour due to the preservation of their colour-producing structures, in other hand the durability of the emotional and aesthetic qualities of these colours creates a sense of lux-ury, uniqueness and preciousness in the user and that means a golden opportunity for a profitable and unique design in the luxury product category.
c) More optical and mechanical nature of these colours, compared to the pigment colours, redu-ces environmental pollution, which is in line with green design ideas.
General principles of use
For the proper use of these colours in product design, interdisciplinary collaboration between industrial desi-gners and some other specialists is required:
1) Physical phase: necessity of controlling shine and glossiness which focuses on the material and geometric design of three-dimensional nanoscale structures, related to optics and material specia-lists and depending on the shape of the surfaces or the surface geometry which must be con-trolled and planned by the designer. For example by designing an appropriate 3D texture to reduce or control the extra shine and glossiness like the natural solution found in one species (Fig. 6).
2) Chemical phases: necessity of controlling the basis of colour factors such as; hue, value, satu-ration, brightness and etc. Due to chemical qua-lity of pigmentation for G3 and for the basic colour of the materials which three-dimensional structures are created on (G2)?
3) Psychophysiological phase: need to control the level of energy exchange, qualitatively; focu-sing on the psychology of colour that is to know which colours stimulate which emotions? Which emotions do we need to create a good user ex-perience in terms of product performance and user interaction? And which ones do we not need? Which colours enhance the users desired emotions and which ones reduce the users negative emotions? ... And quantitatively; depen-ding on the shape of the coloured area, this means how much structural coloured surface is in what shape of the surface? And how much emotion it creates? This is about the creation and control of emotions associated with colour and must be planned and controlled by the designer, according to product function and design requirements, for G2 and G3. As mentioned, the reason for the emphasis on colour psychology in the use of structural colours is their high irrita-ting power compared to pigment colours.
Fig. 6: Structural colour with 3D texture.
Economic level and production technology
These colours can be manufactured under three general areas of technology (Physical, chemical, and biolo-gical) each has different methods and different costs and most of them are possible under nanotechnology which gives them many other benefits and of course, high production costs. Based on the aesthetics qualities as well as production costs, which is technically feasi-ble under nanotechnology, it seems that the class of luxury products is a good place to apply structural colours (Before the production of these colours be-came widespread and affordable) such as jewellery design, it means that they can be used in jewellery design to simulate beautiful, luminous, colourful and durable effects without use of rare stones and dia-monds, or to create structural colours in the body of small products and luxury accessories or parts of larger products (As secondary colour or as emphasizing colour) and for economical use of these colours in the non-luxury product class, they can be used at the golden point or strategic point of some products as a high effective accent colour4 to impress the user.
• Mechanical methods: This method involve the creation of physical nanostructures on the surface of appropriate materials that refract light and create colour effects, by some kinds of 3D printers, lasers and etc. In this method, we can create colourful and permanent nano-engravings on parts of the product, such as engraving the brand name or colourful barcodes or permanent and beautiful QR codes and so on. In this way, any unique identity information about a luxury product or any kind of design and pattern can be permanently, beautifully, luxuriously and safely recorded on its body (Inducing a unique feeling).
• Chemical methods: These are liquid coating col-ours, like as common coatings colours and they can cover on different surfaces, like all conven-tional coating colours. In chemical methods, unlike physical methods, structures that create structural colours are not built on surfaces, but after placing dye on the desired surface, three-dimensional structures that produce structural colour are formed in the molecular arrangement of the dye by colloidal self-control (Wang et al., 2020). In che-mical production methods, chemists control mole-culear arrangements to create different hues. So these can be used for larger levels of luxury pro-ducts as dominant colour.
• Biological methods: In biological production methods, biologists create colour structures by cellular self-control. These methods are so costly and they can be used in medical beauty industry products, like producing cosmetic lenses with stru-ctural colours and so on.
Considering the superior features and the limitations as well as the compliance with the economic progress value chart (Fig. 7), the position found for the current use of structural colours seems to be approved. This means that as we increase personalization, we are going to increase quality, create superior experiences and transformation, and for this purpose we must create a different and superior competitive position, and this requires a high cost, and this is what can achieved by the correct use of structural colours uni-quely, of course along with other design arrangements.
Fig. 7: Eeconomic progress value.
According to this study, the quality and quantity of effectiveness in structural colours are higher than non-
structural colours, so it is not unreasonable if we call the structural colours as super colours or emotional colours and emphasize to apply the advantages of them in product design, because these are more emotional, effective, optimal, creative, attractive, durable and dy-namic colours and also can create a superior colour UX, if applied in the right position and comply with design and production restrictions.
Advantages:
• High emotional and aesthetic level (Associated with a sense of uniqueness and preciousness, un-conscious pleasantness and acceptance)
• High level of attracting attention (Visual per-suasion due to high visual colour quality)
• Coordination with current design approaches in the world such as emotional design, sustainable design and green design.
Principles of use in design despite limitations
• controlling shine and glossiness
• controlling the basis of colour factors
• controlling the level of energy exchange
• Finding the correct scale and position of use
At the end, a suggested pattern for using pigmen-tratural colours according to its intensity in terms of energy exchange level and the cost of production is based on the control of the coloured area, a colour pat-tern which specifies the percentage of colours used is: (dominant colour %60, secondary colour %30 and emphasizing colour %10). The best way to use pig-mentratural colours in this pattern is, first of all, as an emphasizing colour in a product, sometimes as a sub-sidiary/secondary colour and rarely as the dominant colour (In small products), more use of these colours in product design requires the designer to be more careful about the mentioned factors, for example in accesso-ries that are relatively small can be freely used but the use of these colours on a larger scale requires more control. With these colours we can create more attr-active surfaces in the body of the products which in addition to the high aesthetic quality have high dur-ability too, for example, the body of a mobile phone which in addition to its beautiful appearance needs colour durability or we can highlight and emphasize an important part of the product with these colours, we can also have the brand name or colourful barcodes or permanent and beautiful QR codes or any unique identity information about a luxury product or any kind of design and pattern permanently on the product. In products which colours have functional performance in, these colours can be used as the dominant colour with a higher percentage, for example therapeutic use in energy therapy and colour therapy products (For small products). In terms of ergonomics, the use of these colours on large and polished surfaces will cause harassment or damage, and its better to use on tex-tured surfaces that control the amount of reflection and shine, and of course it should be noted that due to the different nature of the coated colours (G1) with the structural colours (G2, G3) these groups will be differ in ergonomic characteristics, which can be an inde-pendent research topic. It should be noted that the structural colours examined in this study from an aes-thetic view, it can be done from other points of view, for example focusing on the application of colour in conveying different concepts according to the way perception and vision are perceived in any biological species which will have different results, or modelling large-scale colour-generating nanostructures can be interesting in environmental design. Of course many of production methods are not yet suitable for industria-lization, but the future of structural colours will be bright given the excellent advantages and relative read-iness of the technological platform. Colours from the distant past for the near future …
Notes
1) F1: Visual quality, F2: Emotional and perceptual quality, F3: Physical reactions
2) G1: Pigment colours, G2: Structural colours, G3: pigmentratural colours (combination of G1 and G2)
3) In this paper the combination of structural col-ours along with pigments is called "Pigmen-tratural" colour
4) Accent colours are colours that are used for em-phasis in a colour scheme.
The authors are grateful to the peoples whose were involved to the successful study. The authors were very grateful and give sincere appreciation to all revie-wers who have contributed their expertise and time to review our manuscript
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
1) Biró, L., Kertész, K., Vigneron, J. (2009). Bioin-spired artificial photonic nanoarchitecture using the elytron of the beetle Trigonophorus roths-childi varians as a ‘blueprint. J. of the Royal Society Interface, 7(47), 887-894.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0438
2) Dumanli, A. G., & Savin, T. (2016). Recent adv-ances in the biomimicry of structural colours. Chemical Society Reviews, 45(24), 6698-6724.
3) Elliot, A. J. (2015). Color and psychological fun-ctioning: a review of theoretical and empirical work. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 368.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00368
4) Ghiradella, H. T., & Butler, M. W. (2009). Many variations on a few themes: a broader look at development of iridescent scales (and feathers). J. of the Royal Society Interface, 6(suppl_2), S243-S251.
5) Lindgaard, G. (2007). Aesthetics, visual appeal, usability and user satisfaction: what do the users eyes tell the users brain? Australian J. of Emer-ging Technologies & Society, 5(1).
https://www.academia.edu/31456959/
6) Magkiriadou, S., Park, J.-G., Kim, Y.-S., & Manoharan, V. N. (2012). Disordered packings of core-shell particles with angle-independent structural colors. Optical Materials Express, 2 (10), 1343-1352.
7) McNamara, M. E., Noh, H., & Cao, H. (2012). The original colours of fossil beetles. Proc. R. Soc. B, 279, 1114-1121.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1677
8) Michielsen, K., De Raedt, H., & Stavenga, D. G. (2009). Reflectivity of the gyroid biophotonic crystals in the ventral wing scales of the Green Hairstreak butterfly, Callophrys rubi. J. of the Royal Society Interface, 7(46), 765-771.
9) Nanay, B. (2016). Aesthetics as philosophy of perception. Oxford University Press.
https://philpapers.org/rec/NANAAP-2
10) Pathiranage D. (2021). Numerical investigation of dropwise condensation on smooth plates with different wettability, Int. J. Mat. Math. Sci., 3(3), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.34104/ijmms.021.060073
11) Seago, A. E., Vigneron, J.-P., & Schultz, T. D. (2008). Gold bugs and beyond: a review of iri-descence and structural.
12) Sokolova, M. V., & Fernández-Caballero, A. (2015). A review on the role of color and light in affective computing. Applied Sciences, 5(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.3390/app5030275
13) Vignolini, S., Rudall, P. J., Steiner, U. (2011). Directional scattering from the glossy flower of Ranunculus: how the buttercup lights up your chin. J. of the Royal Society Interface, 9(71), 1295-1301.
14) Vukusic, P., & Stavenga, D. (2009). Physical methods for investigating structural colours in biological systems. J. of the Royal Society Interface, 6(suppl_2), S133-S148.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0386.focus
15) Wang, H., Sun, L., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Anisotro-pic structural color particles from colloidal phase separation. Science advances, 6(2), eaay 1438.
16) Yoshioka, S., Nakano, T., Nozue, Y., & Kinos-hita, S. (2007). Coloration using higher order optical interference in the wing pattern of the Madagascan sunset moth. J. of the Royal Society Interface, 5(21), 457-464.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2007.1268
17) Zhao, Y. (2016). Structural color materials in evolution. Materials Today, 19(8), 420-421.
18) Zhao, Y., Zhu, C., & Gu, Z. (2012). Bio-inspired variable structural color materials. Chemical Society Reviews, 41(8), 3297-3317.
Academic Editor
Dr. Sonjoy Bishwas, Executive, Universe Publishing Group (UniversePG), California, USA.
Faculty of Art and Architecture, Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
Faravarde H., and Anboohi SZ. (2023). A superior emotional UX in product design by structural colours, Br. J. Arts Humanit., 5(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.34104/bjah.023033042